On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Theodor-Iulian Ciobanu
wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:01:46 +0200
> Ermal Luçi wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Theodor-Iulian Ciobanu
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I came across this same issue yesterday on a system I have just set
>
On 13 April 2012 09:35, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 13 April 2012 09:14, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
>> But you're not referencing the tables in your rules!
>>
>> From pf.conf(5)
>>
>> persist The persist flag forces the kernel to keep the table even when
>> no rules refer to it. I
On 13 April 2012 09:14, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> But you're not referencing the tables in your rules!
>
> From pf.conf(5)
>
> persist The persist flag forces the kernel to keep the table even when
> no rules refer to it. If the flag is not set, the kernel will
> au
But you're not referencing the tables in your rules!
>From pf.conf(5)
persist The persist flag forces the kernel to keep the table even when
no rules refer to it. If the flag is not set, the kernel will
automatically remove the table when the last rule referring
