Re: kern/168190: [pf] panic when using pf and route-to (maybe: bad fragment handling?)

2012-06-01 Thread Ermal Luçi
The following reply was made to PR kern/168190; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= To: Joerg Pulz Cc: Daniel Hartmeier , bug-follo...@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/168190: [pf] panic when using pf and route-to (maybe: bad fragment handling?)

Re: kern/168190: [pf] panic when using pf and route-to (maybe: bad fragment handling?)

2012-06-01 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Joerg Pulz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Tue, 29 May 2012, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > >> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 06:30:09PM +, Joerg Pulz wrote: >> >>>  i've seen 12 more "pf_route: m0->m_len < sizeof(struct ip)" messages >>>

Re: kern/168190: [pf] panic when using pf and route-to (maybe: bad fragment handling?)

2012-06-01 Thread Joerg Pulz
The following reply was made to PR kern/168190; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Joerg Pulz To: Daniel Hartmeier Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/168190: [pf] panic when using pf and route-to (maybe: bad fragment handling?) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:25:39 +

Re: kern/168190: [pf] panic when using pf and route-to (maybe: bad fragment handling?)

2012-06-01 Thread Joerg Pulz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 29 May 2012, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 06:30:09PM +, Joerg Pulz wrote: i've seen 12 more "pf_route: m0->m_len < sizeof(struct ip)" messages since the system is running after adding your patch, but no panic. Is