Hello,

i made the corrections to the patch to make it more readble.
Can some other eyes give a look and say if that have anything against it.
Patch is at same location.


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the patch at location [1] implements support for dummynet into pf(4).
> >
> > The patch has been tested and confirmed working without issues into
> pfSense.
> >
> > Any objections to integrating this into FreeBSD?
>
> for the dummynet/ipfw part i have no objection -- this is only
> a one-line change to sys/netpfil/ipfw/ip_dn_io.c
>
> For the pf part sys/netpfil/pf/pf.c, there are two huge macros
> PACKET_UNDO_NAT() and PACKET_REDO_NAT() which really look ugly.
> It would really make sense to change them into functions
> (they already do some substantial work so the saving of one
> function call is negligible).
>
> There is also some questionable indentation see the calls to
> m_copyback() in PACKET_REDO_NAT()
> Some extra braces around if/else blocks would help immensely.
>
>         cheers
>         luigi
>
> > [1]
> >
> https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-tools/blob/master/patches/RELENG_10_0/dummynet.RELENG_10.diff
> >
> > --
> > Ermal
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>



-- 
Ermal
_______________________________________________
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to