https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172648
Gleb Smirnoff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gleb...@freebsd.org
Assi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179392
Gleb Smirnoff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gleb...@freebsd.org
Assi
Not quite sure if this belongs here or elsewhere; it is PF-related, after
all, so please refer me somewhere else if necessary.
What is the actual intent of this script? It seems to be showing every
rule that *could* have triggered, regardless of whether it *did* trigger.
I'm happy to submit a
Hello Ilya,
just approval from some people.
I will follow-up.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> Hi Ermal,
> yes, this patch works for both #179392 and #172648.
>
> What do you need to merge this into -CURRENT and MFC to stable/9?
>
>
> On 2014-11-14 12:57, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Hi Ermal,
yes, this patch works for both #179392 and #172648.
What do you need to merge this into -CURRENT and MFC to stable/9?
On 2014-11-14 12:57, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Here is a direct patch.
> Give it a try.
>
> For the reply-to issues there is another patch complementary to this i
> will send
Here is a direct patch.
Give it a try.
For the reply-to issues there is another patch complementary to this i will
send.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> actually with _my_ checksumming patch the rdr-to is broken completely :-(
> So I'm waiting for Ermal to se
Hi Ermal,
unfortunately your inline patch seems to be broken, actually it is a
patch for patch???
Please send a correct copy.
On 2014-11-10 09:46, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Give this patch inline a try:
--- a/patches/releng/10.1/pf_reply-to.enahnce.diff
+++ b/patches/releng/10.1/pf_reply-to.enahnce.
Hi all,
actually with _my_ checksumming patch the rdr-to is broken completely
:-(
So I'm waiting for Ermal to send an updated version of his patch that
may really solve the problem!
On 2014-11-14 09:17, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Yes confirmed it will solve that issue as well.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 a
Yes confirmed it will solve that issue as well.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:30 PM, J David wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
> > Of course it was interesting what does the upstream PF do (@ OpenBSD).
> Seems
> > they have made the decision to
> > leave the task of recal
