___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 07:08:10PM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2017, at 15:55, Marek Zarychta wrote:
> The problem description doesn’t ring any bells with me, but I’m also
> not sure
> I’ve fully understood it. Can you document a minimal reproduction
> scenario,
> with a pf.conf
On 8 Jan 2017, at 15:55, Marek Zarychta wrote:
Is it a bug to be officially submitted or it will not be possible to
use
reply-to for UDP traffic anymore?
The problem description doesn’t ring any bells with me, but I’m also
not sure
I’ve fully understood it. Can you document a minimal
For a long period of time, I have been using reply-to rules for a few
TCP and one UDP service which had been introduced for HA reasons and are
used quite rarely.
After upgrade to 11-STABLE the rules for TCP traffic work as expected,
providing kind of symmetric routing, but UDP traffic ignores
