Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> It is a known issue, I have reported to Doug a while back.
*nod*
> As for solution, right now I am thinking about check on each port's
> conflict. Like for example:
>
> - Check on if devel/bison has any of CONFLICT.
> - CONFLICTS is devel/bison2, then check if
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 23:33:02 -0500, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/1/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:50:30 -0500, Jiawei Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am running into 2 problems.
>
> 1. Some ports want devel/bison as dependancy, I insta
On 8/1/06, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:50:30 -0500, Jiawei Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running into 2 problems.
>
> 1. Some ports want devel/bison as dependancy, I installed devel/bison2
> and it works too. But when the bison1 depending port gets u
On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 22:50:30 -0500, Jiawei Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am running into 2 problems.
1. Some ports want devel/bison as dependancy, I installed devel/bison2
and it works too. But when the bison1 depending port gets upgraded by
portmaster, portmaster will insist on bringing in d
On 8/2/06, Jiawei Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] jdk15] $ make -V BUILD_DEPENDS
gm4:/usr/ports/devel/m4 zip:/usr/ports/archivers/zip
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.so:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/open-motif
/usr/local/jdk1.5.0/bin/javac:/usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14
/usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/
On 8/2/06, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No it's not contradictory, linux-sun-jdk is a build time dependance
and is only needed to build java/jdk15. It is not need for JDK15 to
run, this is why it is not listed as a dependancy during a 'make
install'.
Scot
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] jdk15] $
On 8/1/06, Jiawei Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. I just made a java/jdk15 yesterday, and the port gets updated
today, resulting in portmaster wanting to upgrade the port, but
portmaster will also try to install linux-sun-jdk15 as a dependancy on
JDK15. The normal situation is that when there is
I am running into 2 problems.
1. Some ports want devel/bison as dependancy, I installed devel/bison2
and it works too. But when the bison1 depending port gets upgraded by
portmaster, portmaster will insist on bringing in devel/bison, instead
of devel/bison2. Not sure what the correct solution is.
Running a 6-STABLE system, I can't seem to get tcl to build anymore:
Test generated error; Return code was: 1
Return code should have been one of: 0 2
errorInfo: couldn't open socket: host is unreachable
while executing
"socket [info hostname] [lindex [fconfigure $l -sockname]
FYI (sorry for cross-mailing).
Forwarded Message
> From: Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
> Subject: cvs commit: ports/multimedia Makefile
> ports/multimedia/v4l_compat Makefile pkg-descr pkg-plist
> ports/multi
lysergius2001 wrote:
Right. Thanks for that. I am trying to build from the port. I have tried
building libxine - I get the same error... xine builds OK. I have run
libchk - need to study the output.
Thanks again...
Are you saying that you're getting the same error when building libxine?
Right. Thanks for that. I am trying to build from the port. I have tried
building libxine - I get the same error... xine builds OK. I have run
libchk - need to study the output.
Thanks again...
On 30/07/06, B Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lysergius2001 wrote:
> Hi
>
> Tearing my hair
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 00:21 -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:07:10 +0530
> "Gautham Ganapathy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 7/30/06, Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESS
Glenn (g.todd) writes:
> I have tried to portupgrade -rR amarok to 1.4.0a on a FreeBSD
> 6.0-RELEASE #0: Mon Nov 28 21:44:34 UTC 2005 box and get the following
> error. What am I missing.
>
> /usr/X11R6/bin/moc ./ktrm.h -o ktrm.moc
> if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:37:20 -0700
Doug Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am the maintainer of the qpopper port. I now have the IPv6
> patches working for qpopper-4.0.9 and would like to update the port
> with them. What is the proper format to submit the update?
I, for one, prefer 'cvs di
I have tried to portupgrade -rR amarok to 1.4.0a on a FreeBSD
6.0-RELEASE #0: Mon Nov 28 21:44:34 UTC 2005 box and get the following
error. What am I missing.
/usr/X11R6/bin/moc ./ktrm.h -o ktrm.moc
if /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CXX c++
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I
16 matches
Mail list logo
