portconf port

2006-09-10 Thread Doug Hardie
I have been trying to figure out how to configure portconf. The 3 examples given are not much help with complex ports. I am starting with the dspam port (mail/dspam) as if I can figure that one out the rest should be easy. I first tried to use the arguments from the configure command:

Re: PHP 5.1.6 Command Line Arg Gives Seg Fault

2006-09-10 Thread Kian Mohageri
Ron Tarrant wrote: > Hi all, > > I updated my ports tree on Sept. 7 and then built /usr/ports/lang/php5 > (version: 5.1.6). Now the command: > > php --version > > results in a segmentation fault. I wouldn't mind, but I'm working on > building php-gtk2 from source and the configure script uses the a

Re: Problems with whowatch on AMD64

2006-09-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 05:57:58PM -0400, stan wrote: > If I find the time, I might look at this. I suspect the problem > is fairly simple, and I have come to depend on thsi tool. Since > the FreeBSD maintainer is listed as [EMAIL PROTECTED], I was hoping > someone might be working on this already

Re: Problems with whowatch on AMD64

2006-09-10 Thread stan
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 05:28:55PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:52:53PM -0400, stan wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:08:05PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:51:57AM -0400, stan wrote: > > > > whowatch does not seem to work properly on

Re: Problems with whowatch on AMD64

2006-09-10 Thread Wesley Shields
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:52:53PM -0400, stan wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:08:05PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:51:57AM -0400, stan wrote: > > > whowatch does not seem to work properly on my 6.1 CURRENT > > > amd64 systems. Is this a known problem? Is there a

Re: portmaster's root and leaf ports

2006-09-10 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Peter Jeremy wrote: On Sun, 2006-Sep-10 19:55:36 +0200, Hans Lambermont wrote: What's going on here ? Aren't these all dependencies that should have been tracked ? (shouldn't they be in the Trunk or Branch sections ?) A port can have six different dependency types (extract, patch, fetch, build

Re: portmaster's root and leaf ports

2006-09-10 Thread B Briggs
Peter Jeremy wrote: On Sun, 2006-Sep-10 19:55:36 +0200, Hans Lambermont wrote: What's going on here ? Aren't these all dependencies that should have been tracked ? (shouldn't they be in the Trunk or Branch sections ?) A port can have six different dependency types (extract, patch, fetch, buil

Re: portmaster's root and leaf ports

2006-09-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sun, 2006-Sep-10 19:55:36 +0200, Hans Lambermont wrote: >What's going on here ? Aren't these all dependencies that should have >been tracked ? (shouldn't they be in the Trunk or Branch sections ?) A port can have six different dependency types (extract, patch, fetch, build, run, lib). Of these

PHP 5.1.6 Command Line Arg Gives Seg Fault

2006-09-10 Thread Ron Tarrant
Hi all, I updated my ports tree on Sept. 7 and then built /usr/ports/lang/php5 (version: 5.1.6). Now the command: php --version results in a segmentation fault. I wouldn't mind, but I'm working on building php-gtk2 from source and the configure script uses the above command to confirm insta

portmaster's root and leaf ports

2006-09-10 Thread Hans Lambermont
Hi, On an empty ports system, i've installed : sysutils/portconf x11/xorg devel/glib20 x11/kde3 sysutils/portmaster Now I expect only portconf and portmaster to be in the "Root ports (No dependencies, not depended on)" section of portmaster, but I find this : # portmaster -l

Re: Problems with whowatch on AMD64

2006-09-10 Thread stan
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:08:05PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:51:57AM -0400, stan wrote: > > whowatch does not seem to work properly on my 6.1 CURRENT > > amd64 systems. Is this a known problem? Is there a workaround? > > I just built and installed it on 6.1-RELEASE-

Re: Problems with whowatch on AMD64

2006-09-10 Thread Wesley Shields
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:51:57AM -0400, stan wrote: > whowatch does not seem to work properly on my 6.1 CURRENT > amd64 systems. Is this a known problem? Is there a workaround? I just built and installed it on 6.1-RELEASE-p5 and it appears to run fine at first glance. Can you give more informat

FreeBSD Port: majordomo-1.94.5_2

2006-09-10 Thread Karl Friesen
When I do a "make install" for majordomo under FreeBSD6, the make fails with the messages: install: /usr/ports/mail/majordomo/files/test-l: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 and then install: /usr/ports/mail/majordomo/files/test-l-digest: No such file or directory *** Error code 71

Problems with whowatch on AMD64

2006-09-10 Thread stan
whowatch does not seem to work properly on my 6.1 CURRENT amd64 systems. Is this a known problem? Is there a workaround? -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l

FreeBSD Port: graphics/gliv

2006-09-10 Thread Stefan Thurner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Gliv is an image viewer and not a "gnome image viewer". So is it possible to avoid all the gnome stuff in the Makefile? In my opinion the gnome stuff should only be used if gnome is already installed. best regards - -Stefan - -- GPG-encrypted ma