Re: is it safe to upgrade ruby18?

2006-12-23 Thread Parv
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Armin Arh thusly... > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:21:22PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: > > The portmanager program wants to upgrade ruby18. Is is safe to > > let it? I made the mistake of trying to do a "portupgrade ruby18" under > good question. > As ru

Re: HEADS UP : security/gnupg will be upgraded to 2.0.1

2006-12-23 Thread Chris
On 19/12/06, martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Mon, 2006-Dec-11 23:43:48 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >> If this is your plan, it leads me to the next question, which is how >> are you going to handle the fact that GnuPG 2.x does not install a >> binary named "gpg?" > > As

Re: is it safe to upgrade ruby18?

2006-12-23 Thread Armin Arh
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:21:22PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: > The portmanager program wants to upgrade ruby18. Is is safe to > let it? I made the mistake of trying to do a "portupgrade ruby18" under good question. As ruby is crucial to the portmanager special care should be taken. Good l

is it safe to upgrade ruby18?

2006-12-23 Thread Scott Bennett
The portmanager program wants to upgrade ruby18. Is is safe to let it? I made the mistake of trying to do a "portupgrade ruby18" under FreeBSD 5.3. ruby18 never worked again. That meant none of the pkg* or port* commands ever worked again either. When I updated the system to FreeBSD 5.4,

math/atlas error in Make.top prevents building it via portinstall

2006-12-23 Thread Scott Bennett
The math/atlas package atlas-3.6.0 has an error in ATLAS/Make.top that wipes out libraries just unpacked by tar that are needed to build the port. The atlas errata web page describes the error and states that deleting line 215 from ATLAS/Make.out will prevent the deletions from occurring. Unfo

Re: Config info

2006-12-23 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:31:49AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Saturday 23 December 2006 08:23, Bill Moran wrote: > > Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually > > > stored? > > > > /var/db/ports/ > > > > But the canonic

You'll get the same results as adding a web service from the context menu above.

2006-12-23 Thread inconclusively
These tools are particularly effective forreal-world use issues, because they offer scalable visualizationand editing of very large XML schemas. Using the Spell Check Feature Another useful feature of this application is Google's spell check feature. Kumar also coauthored the book on Web service

Re: Config info

2006-12-23 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:14:20 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 07:13:38 -0900 Beech Rintoul wrote: > > Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored? > /var/db/pkg/ Sorry, that should be /var/db/ports. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engi

Re: Config info

2006-12-23 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 07:13:38 -0900 Beech Rintoul wrote: > Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored? /var/db/pkg/ WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To

Re: Config info

2006-12-23 Thread Bill Moran
Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored? /var/db/ports/ But the canonical way to adjust these is with "make config" in the port directory. -Bill ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.

Re: Config info

2006-12-23 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Saturday 23 December 2006 08:23, Bill Moran wrote: > Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually > > stored? > > /var/db/ports/ > > But the canonical way to adjust these is with "make config" in the port > directory. > > -Bill

Re: Config info

2006-12-23 Thread Anton Berezin
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 07:13:38AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote: > Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored? /var/db/ports/portname -- We're going for 'working' here. 'clean' is for people with skills... -- Flemming Jacobsen _

gcc-ooo issue

2006-12-23 Thread Joshua F Hollenbeck
Dear port maintainer, here is a possible problem with the gcc-ooo port. My tree and install ports were upgrades today (December 23, 2006 at 10:00am EST). Here is my error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make install clean ===> Building for gcc-ooo-3.4.1_2 gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gc

Config info

2006-12-23 Thread Beech Rintoul
Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored? TIA Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO

Re: Strange fonts in firefox since update to 2.0.0.1

2006-12-23 Thread Heino Tiedemann
Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday, 22. December 2006 15:09, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> Hi There, >> >> since I updated the port www/firefox to the new version >> "firefox-2.0.0.1,1" I have e strange, "default font". > > Like this? Ah, now I saw the image. I do not mean the