in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Armin Arh thusly...
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:21:22PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
> > The portmanager program wants to upgrade ruby18. Is is safe to
> > let it? I made the mistake of trying to do a "portupgrade ruby18" under
> good question.
> As ru
On 19/12/06, martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-Dec-11 23:43:48 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> If this is your plan, it leads me to the next question, which is how
>> are you going to handle the fact that GnuPG 2.x does not install a
>> binary named "gpg?"
>
> As
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:21:22PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
> The portmanager program wants to upgrade ruby18. Is is safe to
> let it? I made the mistake of trying to do a "portupgrade ruby18" under
good question.
As ruby is crucial to the portmanager special care should be taken.
Good l
The portmanager program wants to upgrade ruby18. Is is safe to
let it? I made the mistake of trying to do a "portupgrade ruby18" under
FreeBSD 5.3. ruby18 never worked again. That meant none of the pkg* or
port* commands ever worked again either. When I updated the system to
FreeBSD 5.4,
The math/atlas package atlas-3.6.0 has an error in ATLAS/Make.top that
wipes out libraries just unpacked by tar that are needed to build the port.
The atlas errata web page describes the error and states that deleting
line 215 from ATLAS/Make.out will prevent the deletions from occurring.
Unfo
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 08:31:49AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Saturday 23 December 2006 08:23, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually
> > > stored?
> >
> > /var/db/ports/
> >
> > But the canonic
These tools are particularly effective forreal-world use issues, because they
offer scalable visualizationand editing of very large XML schemas.
Using the Spell Check Feature Another useful feature of this application is
Google's spell check feature. Kumar also coauthored the book on Web service
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:14:20 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 07:13:38 -0900 Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored?
> /var/db/pkg/
Sorry, that should be /var/db/ports.
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engi
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 07:13:38 -0900 Beech Rintoul wrote:
> Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored?
/var/db/pkg/
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To
Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored?
/var/db/ports/
But the canonical way to adjust these is with "make config" in the port
directory.
-Bill
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.
On Saturday 23 December 2006 08:23, Bill Moran wrote:
> Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually
> > stored?
>
> /var/db/ports/
>
> But the canonical way to adjust these is with "make config" in the port
> directory.
>
> -Bill
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 07:13:38AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored?
/var/db/ports/portname
--
We're going for 'working' here. 'clean' is for people with skills...
-- Flemming Jacobsen
_
Dear port maintainer,
here is a possible problem with the gcc-ooo port. My tree and install
ports were upgrades today (December 23, 2006 at 10:00am EST).
Here is my error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make install clean
===> Building for gcc-ooo-3.4.1_2
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/lang/gc
Can someone tell me where the config options for a port are actually stored?
TIA
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel
\ / - NO
Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, 22. December 2006 15:09, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
>> Hi There,
>>
>> since I updated the port www/firefox to the new version
>> "firefox-2.0.0.1,1" I have e strange, "default font".
>
> Like this?
Ah, now I saw the image.
I do not mean the
15 matches
Mail list logo