On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Scot Hetzel wrote:
So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now
breaking on all of the existing 6.0 systems...
It shouldn't break existing systems, as the scripts are still run in
alphabetical order on the 6.0 systems before revision
Scot Hetzel wrote:
So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now
breaking on all of the existing 6.0 systems...
It shouldn't break existing systems, as the scripts are still run in
alphabetical order on the 6.0 systems before revision 1.336.2.1 of
/etc/rc.
Which scripts ar
Any idea when we can expect the next update?
Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of
ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exp
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on th
Dear FreeBSD port maintainer:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of
ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
Looks like maybe I was a little bit too hasty and there is a better
explanation and fix. Please see:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139985
on 12/01/2007 20:00 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> Guys,
>
> FYI.
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: kern/106432: Record of dis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> News:
>
> Kris approved that migration to gfortran
>
>>Unless the changes are too extensive, please proceed.
>
> so I'll proceed.
Hi all,
Could be this thread related to some problem I have encountered building
Scipy on my freebsd boxes (6.2) ?
On one of my free
Guys,
FYI.
Original Message
Subject: Re: kern/106432: Record of disks (DVD-R) through the k3b
program leads to lag of system
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:57:06 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like
News:
Kris approved that migration to gfortran
> Unless the changes are too extensive, please proceed.
so I'll proceed.
* currently all ports using fortran are unstable. please wait until I announce
about it
current status of migration
wait ... wait for commit approval
source ... f90/f77 so
Jo Rhett wrote:
> I'd just like to confirm that rcorder wasn't implemented until 6.1, right?
Scot's answer was correct here in terms of timing. If you're looking
for a big round number, 6.1-RELEASE is good enough.
> So all of the ports which are being updated to use rcorder are now
> breaking on
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:04:42PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> There is an exploit out for cacti. Details here:
>
> http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=18846&start=30
>
> Patches here:
>
> http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=18846&start=30
>
> There is no new release yet. Shall I cre
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:17:26 +0100
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Jean-Yves Lefort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 11 Jan 2007
> 17:21:36 + (UTC)):
>
> > jylefort2007-01-11 17:21:36 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > devel/glib
Quoting Jean-Yves Lefort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 11 Jan 2007
17:21:36 + (UTC)):
jylefort2007-01-11 17:21:36 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
devel/glib20 Makefile
Log:
On i386 (>= 486) and amd64, fix the arch passed to configure so that
glib w
Hello,
since i am writing a substitute program to portupgrade, i have noticed a
problem that i have hard time figuring out, and i would like to sollicit
the advice of more experienced people. The point is, what to do about
ports which have been installed as dependencies of some other ports, but
th
As the release took a long time to finish and tag slipping has been
practically impossible for some time, officially the tree was still in a
slush state. That is now over and the tree is open for all commits as
usual again.
Thank you all for your patience.
-erwin
--
Erwin Lansing
On 1/12/07, Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd just like to confirm that rcorder wasn't implemented until 6.1,
right?
rcorder was implemented for the base system scripts in 5.0-RELEASE,
support for the ports rc.d scripts was implemented in 6.0-STABLE
(/etc/rc 1.336.2.1 on 2005/12/21 07:11:
17 matches
Mail list logo