Port marked as IGNORE: java/diablo-jre15 though not trying to upgrade

2007-02-13 Thread Lars Stokholm
Despite having already installed diablo-jre15 and despite it not needing an upgrade, if I delete the distfile, I get this when running 'portupgrade -a': ** Port marked as IGNORE: java/diablo-jre15: :\n Because of licensing restrictions, you must fetch the distribution\n manually.

Re: FreeBSD Port: rancid-2.3.1_1

2007-02-13 Thread Mohacsi Janos
Hi Aaron, What do you mean by getting rancid-dev version ? You would need the alpha release? Regards, Janos Mohacsi Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882 On

Re: gtk-2.10.9 doesn't compile

2007-02-13 Thread Vittorio
As requested, please find attached the complete, tarred log of gtk failed compilation. Ciao Vittorio -- Messaggio inoltrato -- Subject: Re: gtk-2.10.9 doesn't compile Date: 18:06, lunedì 12 febbraio 2007 From: Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Vittorio [EMAIL

Re: gtk-2.10.9 doesn't compile

2007-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please find attached the complete tarred log of gtk failed compilation. Ciao Vittorio -- Messaggio inoltrato -- Subject: Re: gtk-2.10.9 doesn't compile Date: 18:06, lunedì 12 febbraio 2007 From: Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL

RE: FreeBSD Port: rancid-2.3.1_1

2007-02-13 Thread Aaron Dudek \(adudek\)
Yes, that is correct, the alpha version. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mohacsi Janos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:47 To: Aaron Dudek (adudek) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: rancid-2.3.1_1 Hi Aaron, What do

RE: FreeBSD Port: rancid-2.3.1_1

2007-02-13 Thread Aaron Dudek \(adudek\)
If possible, the 2.3.2a7 release. Aaron -Original Message- From: Aaron Dudek (adudek) Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:58 To: 'Mohacsi Janos' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: rancid-2.3.1_1 Yes, that is correct, the alpha version. Aaron

default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread Palle Girgensohn
Hi! As the maintainer of the PostgreSQL ports, I'm planning a move to set the 8.1.x branch as the default version for FreeBSD. Now it is 7.4, which starts to get a bit rusty. Any objections? /Palle Index: Mk/bsd.database.mk ===

Re: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread LI Xin
Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi! As the maintainer of the PostgreSQL ports, I'm planning a move to set the 8.1.x branch as the default version for FreeBSD. Now it is 7.4, which starts to get a bit rusty. I vote for the change. Thanks! Cheers, -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ruby segfaults on FreeBSD 6.2 + tidy-lib-070211

2007-02-13 Thread Jonathan Weiss
Cheers, I use the tidy/Ruby bridge on FreeBSD 6.2 to filter html mails. I have tidy-lib-070211 and Ruby 1.8.5 installed. Ruby dies with this output: Command died with signal 6: /usr/local/bin/ruby. Command output:

[solved] Re: Need help with porting tvtime - uses video4linux (was [Fwd: Re: Porting a Linux application to FreeBSD])

2007-02-13 Thread youshi10
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Florent Thoumie wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Florent Thoumie wrote: Garrett Cooper wrote: Hello Florent, I was given your name after some corresponding on the ports@ list because I am trying to port a video4linux enabled application to

Re: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread Koen Martens
Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi! As the maintainer of the PostgreSQL ports, I'm planning a move to set the 8.1.x branch as the default version for FreeBSD. Now it is 7.4, which starts to get a bit rusty. Any objections? I'm all in favour of this. Any specific reason you're not moving to the

RE: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
Go for it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Palle Girgensohn Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK? Hi! As the maintainer of the PostgreSQL ports, I'm planning a move

x11-toolkits/wxgtk26: fatal error: had to relocate PCH

2007-02-13 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi ! Please Cc: me in your replies. I'm trying to install multimedia/vlc on my 3 month-old -CURRENT, and I got the following error while compiling one of its dependency (x11-toolkits/wxgtk26): % g++ -c -o xmldll_xml.o -I.pch/wxprec_xmldll -D__WXGTK__ -DwxUSE_GUI=0 -DWXUSINGDLL

math/ATLAS upgrade fails Benchmarking xzllttst

2007-02-13 Thread John Bowman
I am duplicating Karsten Rothemund's earlier post, as my error message is identical except for timing numbers: Unfortunately I only have the last few lines (because of the portupgrade): 10 cases: 10 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed Benchmarking xcllttstF NREPS UPLO Nlda TIME

Re: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread Palle Girgensohn
13 feb 2007 kl. 18.17 skrev Koen Martens: Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi! As the maintainer of the PostgreSQL ports, I'm planning a move to set the 8.1.x branch as the default version for FreeBSD. Now it is 7.4, which starts to get a bit rusty. Any objections? I'm all in favour of this. Any

Re: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread Palle Girgensohn
13 feb 2007 kl. 20.00 skrev Kris Kennaway: On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 04:37:00PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi! As the maintainer of the PostgreSQL ports, I'm planning a move to set the 8.1.x branch as the default version for FreeBSD. Now it is 7.4, which starts to get a bit rusty. Any

Re: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread Vivek Khera
On Feb 13, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 04:37:00PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi! As the maintainer of the PostgreSQL ports, I'm planning a move to set the 8.1.x branch as the default version for FreeBSD. Now it is 7.4, which starts to get a bit

Re: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:33:11PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: Won't it break something? :) Of course it will... ;^) But I don't think that it will break anything more badly than what can be fixed by a portupgrade -rf postgresql-server.. Also, the default postgresql version

Re: multimedia/kbtv: broken saa kmod?

2007-02-13 Thread Danny Pansters
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 04:09, Yuri Pankov wrote: snip Hi, I've attached a patch allowing saa kmod to compile cleanly on amd64 with WERROR defined. I don't use kbtv but am interested in saa713x driver, so improvements to make it work in SECAM are welcome. Just setting SECAM video

where to install kld ports

2007-02-13 Thread Juergen Lock
Hi! I received a request (with patch) to install kqemu-kmod in /usr/local/modules like fusefs-kmod does. Other klds, like nivdia-driver, still install into /boot/modules, so I wonder what is better... The upside would be that the kld wouldn't be deleted by installkernel, the downsides I can

Re: How does portupgrade -ar work?

2007-02-13 Thread RW
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:13:50 +0100 Uwe Laverenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 08:30:58PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote: First of all, is it safe to just use 'portupgrade -a' or should I use 'portupgrade -ar'. 'portupgrade -a' is sufficient and in fact is not different

Re: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread Ade Lovett
On Feb 13, 2007, at 09:17 , Koen Martens wrote: I'm all in favour of this. Any specific reason you're not moving to the 8.2.x branch? 8.2.x isn't really stable enough yet for Joe User to pick it up when they want postgresql support for random-port. I'm definitely in favor of making 8.1.x

openoffice 2 (RC, devel) broken

2007-02-13 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Hi, openoffice.org-2 openoffice.org-2-RC openoffice.org-2-devel is broken on amd64 (running 6.2-PRERELEASE): g++41 -O -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,libicuio.so.36 -o ../lib/libicuio.so.36.0 locbund.o ufile.o ufmt_cmn.o uprintf.o uprntf_p.o uscanf.o uscanf_p.o ustdio.o sprintf.o sscanf.o

Re: default postgresql 7.4 - 8.1, OK?

2007-02-13 Thread Palle Girgensohn
14 feb 2007 kl. 05.29 skrev Ade Lovett: On Feb 13, 2007, at 09:17 , Koen Martens wrote: I'm all in favour of this. Any specific reason you're not moving to the 8.2.x branch? 8.2.x isn't really stable enough yet for Joe User to pick it up when they want postgresql support for random-port.

Re: openoffice 2 (RC, devel) broken

2007-02-13 Thread Maho NAKATA
From: Oliver Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openoffice 2 (RC, devel) broken Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 06:01:49 +0100 Hi, openoffice.org-2 openoffice.org-2-RC openoffice.org-2-devel is broken on amd64 (running 6.2-PRERELEASE): g++41 -O -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,libicuio.so.36 -o

Re: where to install kld ports

2007-02-13 Thread Alex Dupre
Juergen Lock ha scritto: The upside would be that the kld wouldn't be deleted by installkernel I don't think they are deleted, the modules directory is not replaced on installkernel. If the kld is needed at boot time by loader it cannot stay in /usr/local, but probably kqemu can be loaded