Moving applications from to

2007-03-16 Thread Ed Schouten
Hello, As some of you may know, FreeBSD -CURRENT has split up the COMPAT_43 option to two separate ones: COMPAT_43, which implements a lot of old crufty system calls and COMPAT_43TTY, which implements the old BSD TTY line discipline. COMPAT_43 has been disabled on -CURRENT and some people hope tha

Native Remedies

2007-03-16 Thread Alberto Crippa
Native Remedies - Proven, Effective Herbal Remedies for a Wide Range of Conditions and Disorder Native Remedies provides proven, effective and safe herbal and homeopathic remedies for a wide range of conditions and disorders, for both People and Pets! For people, this includes ADHD/ADD, anxiety

FreeBSD Port: bruteblock-0.0.5_1

2007-03-16 Thread Neal Nelson
I have installed Bruteblock as specified in the documentation but it completely fails to pick up any of the SSH break-in attempts that happen on my system (and there's a lot). Is the configuration as installed OK or do I need to tweek something? The regex in the config file seems to match what com

Re: enlightenment-devel does not compile

2007-03-16 Thread Vassilis Laganakos
Ok, done! Kind regards, Vassilis On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 08:56:58PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > >>Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) > >>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > >> > >>iD8

Re: SQUID PACKAGE

2007-03-16 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:18:18PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:06:49PM +0500, VAD wrote: > > Hello. > > Please add to ports the package of Squid - 2.6.10 > > Thank you/ > > OK, miwi travelled back in time by 8 days and did it especially for > you! :) Or maybe VAD is t

Re: cannot upgrade p5-Pod-Simple

2007-03-16 Thread Anton Berezin
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:06:10PM +0100, Lars Kristiansen wrote: > I am having a problem upgrading p5-Pod-Simple. > But i do not know perl. > Can one tell from this output if it is something wrong with my > installation or if it is something wrong with the port? There is a tricky bug which invo

pkg_check.py

2007-03-16 Thread Michel Talon
Hello, this is to announce version 1.0 of pkg_check.py, a python program to check the contents of /var/db/pkg, and the last piece of the puzzle in the programs trying to emulate portupgrade in a different way. It is available at: http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/pkg_check.py always under BSD li

FreeBSD Port: phpMyAdmin-2.10.0.2

2007-03-16 Thread Daniel Dvořák
In March there were reports about bad dependences for phpMyAdmin, specially missing php-ctype like this http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2007-March/114357.html It seems that the latest phpmyadmin-2.10.0.1 release now requires functions from the PHP ctype module. undefi

Re: enlightenment-devel does not compile

2007-03-16 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:32:05 +0200 Vassilis Laganakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > Ok, done! > > Kind regards, > Well, this is a know problem, but it isn't solvable with current ports infrastructure (i don't know how to do that, at least). The dbus support is enabled by default, so if you'll

Re: FreeBSD Port: phpMyAdmin-2.10.0.2

2007-03-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
Daniel Dvořák wrote: > Fatal error: Call to undefined function ctype_digit() in > /usr/local/www/phpMyAdmin/libraries/common.lib.php on line 2993 > > It seems something wrong with php5-ctype ? > > What can I do with this ? Can you try this small test to see if your php setup really does have b

Re: cannot upgrade p5-Pod-Simple

2007-03-16 Thread Lars Kristiansen
Anton Berezin skrev: On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:06:10PM +0100, Lars Kristiansen wrote: I am having a problem upgrading p5-Pod-Simple. But i do not know perl. Can one tell from this output if it is something wrong with my installation or if it is something wrong with the port? There is a tric

Re: (no subject)

2007-03-16 Thread Garrett Cooper
Garrett Cooper wrote: Robert Huff wrote: Vizion writes: I do not know about that.. If there is a refusal to keep the port in the tree then the folks at OpenOffice will HAVE to do something about it. They will? Why? While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously creat