Cheers,
I'm struggeling with setting up Apache 2.2 and mod_auth_pam to
authenticate an BasicAuth directory against my local unix users.
Apache is using PAM in so far as when I have his /etc/pam.d/httpd config:
auth required pam_permit.so debug
accountrequired pam_permit.so
Once in a while a port fails to upgrade, because it wants to write
something in /etc. E.g. perl into /etc/make.conf or other ports into
/etc/group.
On my systems / is normally a read only mount. These ports build fine
during a portupgrade and fail during install, leaving most of the port
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:59:19 Kris Kennaway wrote:
I guess one of those libraries needs to be rebuilt.
grep -r /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib
should show you the files that need to be rebuilt. pkg_which will
help you to figure out which port they
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..gaim-hotkeys-0.2.2:
/local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/net-im/gaim-devel non-existent -- dependency
list incomplete
=== net-im/gaim-hotkeys failed
*** Error code 1
*** Error code 1
Stop in /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports.
*** Error
On 5/3/07, Jonathan Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm struggeling with setting up Apache 2.2 and mod_auth_pam to
authenticate an BasicAuth directory against my local unix users.
I'm using pam authentication with apache 2.2. We mostly use radius for
authentication but here is my config:
$
Alejandro Pulver wrote:
The reason AFAIK is the lack of cache for block devices, which was
(re)added in FreeBSD-CURRENT (7.x).
I don't think something like that cache has been added in -CURRENT.
AFAIK things are still the same as in 6.x.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..gaim-hotkeys-0.2.2:
/local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/net-im/gaim-devel non-existent -- dependency
list incomplete
=== net-im/gaim-hotkeys failed
*** Error code 1
*** Error code 1
Stop in /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports.
*** Error
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Garrett Cooper wrote:
[snipped]
It's missing a dependency. Look at the original source's website because
it may offer some clues as to what package(s) is/are required to compile
vlc against.
Thanks for the hint, but I couldn't find any information on required
libraries as the vlc-folks
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
thanks,
MC
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mal content wrote:
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
thanks,
MC
A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the first
place. No one was really able to tell weather to put a port into /usr/X11R6 or
/usr/local anyway.
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:47PM +0100, mal content wrote:
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
/usr/local is the new de facto standard, AFAIK no-one is using
/usr/X11R7.
Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:32:28AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:59:19 Kris Kennaway wrote:
I guess one of those libraries needs to be rebuilt.
grep -r /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib
should show you the files that need to be
On 03/05/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:47PM +0100, mal content wrote:
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
/usr/local is the new de facto standard, AFAIK no-one is using
/usr/X11R7.
Kris
Oh, OK.
thanks,
MC
On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote:
I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly others
need them too but did not have this problem, only
No, it's because something is stale on your system and needs to be
rebuilt.
I dont know, look
#
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:43:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote:
I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly others
need them too but did not have this problem, only
No, it's because something is stale on your
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:00:24 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:43:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote:
I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly
others need them too but did not have this problem,
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:14:58PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:00:24 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:43:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote:
I guess this is a port configuration problem because
On Thursday 03 May 2007 19:12:45 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
mal content wrote:
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
thanks,
MC
A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the
first place. No one was really able to tell
Danny Pansters writes:
/usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for
all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It
won't be missed or mourned :)
While I understand why this is going to happen, I've been of
the opinion it ought to be retained with
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some
port configurations
OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored my
instructions 3 times now, so I'm giving up and will let you
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:37 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Danny Pansters writes:
/usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for
all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It
won't be missed or mourned :)
While I understand why this is going to
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some
port configurations
OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored my
On Thursday 03 May 2007 17:34:04 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in
some port configurations
OK, I was willing
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:06PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 17:34:04 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Rong-en Fan thusly...
On 5/3/07, Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently teTeX development/support ended on May 2006
(according to http://www.tug.org/tetex/)
...
Will there be any Tex Live port in our future? I did not find
anything suitable via
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:10 +0100, RW wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2007 18:53:22 -0400
Robert Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote:
Hi,
I’m getting the following error when using portmanager:
barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote:
Hi,
I’m getting the following error when using portmanager:
barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager -ui
rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9 error: /usr/ports/-ui is not a valid port
directory
rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9 info:either you have used
Hello,
SDL_gui has moved from:
http://www.newimage.com/~rhk/SDL_gui
to:
http://rhk.dataslab.com/SDL_gui
Thanks!
-Ray
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
I will be freezing the ports tree in 15 minutes in preparation for the
X.Org 7.2 merge. The merge will not happen right away. Instead, we
will enter a period of testing as per Kris' email. During this freeze
only portmgr, and those working on the X.Org merge will be allowed to
commit.
Joe
--
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:47 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
I will be freezing the ports tree in 15 minutes in preparation for the
X.Org 7.2 merge. The merge will not happen right away. Instead, we
will enter a period of testing as per Kris' email. During this freeze
only portmgr, and those
31 matches
Mail list logo
