Andriy Babiy wrote:
I wanted to try making the port, but faced a problem:
The requested URL /spca50x/Download/gspcav1-20070110.tar.gz was not found
on this server.
Apache/ProXad [Apr 14 2007 12:48:55] Server at mxhaard.free.fr
This is what I get when I try downloading the source.
Of course, I
Hi,
I wanted to try making the port, but faced a problem:
The requested URL /spca50x/Download/gspcav1-20070110.tar.gz was not found
on this server.
Apache/ProXad [Apr 14 2007 12:48:55] Server at mxhaard.free.fr
This is what I get when I try downloading the source.
Of course, I tried installing
On 5/16/07, Ulrich Spoerlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sam Lawrance wrote:
> I think I have figured this out. In short: portupgrade does not include new,
previously not
> installed, dependencies in its list of tasks when updating. In this
particular case,
> gstreamer-plugins-bad was built b
Your mail to 'BRAINS-devel' with the subject
delivery failed
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> And also, the only reason it goes slow is because it has to do
> (cd $$dir; make -V PKGNAME)
> for every dir in _LIB_RUN_DEPENDS. But if instead we kept a file in
> /var/db/pkg called
> something like +PACKAGE_NAMES, where as each port is created we add in a one
Sam Lawrance wrote:
> I think I have figured this out. In short: portupgrade does not include new,
> previously not
> installed, dependencies in its list of tasks when updating. In this
> particular case,
> gstreamer-plugins-bad was built before one of its dependencies was updated,
> and we
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> 1. Pulling in the dependencies. This is in effect doing a "make
> package-depends". You can
> do this for yourself, and see that it takes a long time. I honestly don't
> see how to make
> this faster, as presumably it involves calling "make" on all the depe
Li-Lun Wang (Leland Wang) píše v st 16. 05. 2007 v 04:02 +0800:
> A port installs modules into $SCIM_MODULEDIR, which is determined by
> using
>
> SCIM_MODULEDIR=`pkg-config --variable=moduledir scim`
>
> during configure. I wonder if I should just let the port to install to
> $SCIM_MODUL
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
1. Pulling in the dependencies. This is in effect doing a "make package-depends". You can
do this for yourself, and see that it takes a long time. I honestly don't see how to make
this faster, as presumably it involves calling "make" o
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:29:30PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
>
> On 13/05/2007, at 5:26 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:20:53PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> >>
> >>On 13/05/2007, at 5:13 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +1000, Sam Law
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
And also, the only reason it goes slow is because it has to do
(cd $$dir; make -V PKGNAME)
for every dir in _LIB_RUN_DEPENDS. But if instead we kept a file in /var/db/pkg called
something like +PACKAGE_NAMES, where as each port is created
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:30:50PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
> Sam Lawrance wrote:
> > I think I have figured this out. In short: portupgrade does not include
> > new, previously not
> > installed, dependencies in its list of tasks when updating. In this
> > particular case,
> > gstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
A port installs modules into $SCIM_MODULEDIR, which is determined by
using
SCIM_MODULEDIR=`pkg-config --variable=moduledir scim`
during configure. I wonder if I should just let the port to install to
$SCIM_MODULEDIR determined this way
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
> developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to
> test the upgrade and report problems you encounter, before we unleash
> it on the general user base.
Today, the update of my 6.2-STABLE wo
Hello!
I had some problems with xorg upgrade but they seemed to be my fault: I
had some broken with dependencies before portupgrade -a, but after it
failed first time I corrected them by pkgdb -F. After that everything
went well.
But now I have this problem when installing the gimp:
$ sudo make
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v po 14. 05. 2007 v 09:39 -0500:
Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is
already to be found in +CONTENTS. So here is a proof of concept
patch to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk (proof of c
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reporting success on one of my desktops. It's a current/i386
> box with a little over 1000 packages (after the upgrade).
No major problems on RELENG_6/i386 with little over 700 packages.
At first xorg's radeon driver was really slow after the
upda
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v po 14. 05. 2007 v 09:39 -0500:
Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is
already to be found in +CONTENTS. So here is a proof of concept patch
to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk (proof of concept because no error
checking
I've recompiled and tested almost all my 700 ports (openoffice too).
At this moment only x11-toolkits/qt4-gui fails to build.
There is another minor question.
LibGL conflicts with nvidia-driver, but nvidia-driver requires LibGL,
so you can run into troubles building libGL with nvidia-driver
insta
2007/5/15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sounds unrelated because I can switch to the console no problem under Linux.
It was/was not related.
Something went wrong dealing with xorg-server (make deinstall
complained about bad md5sum), nvidia and libGL.
All goes right reinstalling these p
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:40:27PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:36:26PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > Everything built with no errors. Tested, looks good with KDE (fonts look
> > better). One error, had to merge skype by hand.
>
> Thanks, yeah I think skype (and prob
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v po 14. 05. 2007 v 09:39 -0500:
> Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is
> already to be found in +CONTENTS. So here is a proof of concept patch
> to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk (proof of concept because no error
> checking, and things li
22 matches
Mail list logo
