Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> is there any way to generate set of /var/db/ports/*/options in their default
> state? BATCH=1 will leave this hierarchy untouched, but when installing new
> system I would prefer options files to be generated, to be able to look
> through, analyze
First of all your error report was very thorough, so kudos there. :)
While this is not a direct response to your question, I've always had
good luck using the "open with" feature of firefox, rather than using
the plugin. Look at Edit | Preferences | Content | File Types.
hth,
Doug
--
This
I am unable to get PDF documents to open properly in Firefox since I
updated to xorg 7.2 and linux_base-fc-4_10.
1) It was working before these updates.
2) Now, a PDF document tries to open in a Firefox webpage. gv opens
fine, but is unable to parse the PDF, leaving a completely blank page
with
Hi all,
I believe this issue is solved with the following patch for
genbki.sh.
The problem was most likely because '/usr/bin/sed' isnt quite
compatible with how this script runs. However using 'gsed' seems
like effective for clearing this bug. :)
Best regards,
Etienne
patch-genbki
Description
Robert Gilaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> I've noticed that nomachine has updated their freenx packages for
> different distributions. Now they even have amd64 native packages and I
> was wondering if that means we will see the amd64 version in freebsd
> anytime soon.
A port of 2.1.0 libs
--On July 15, 2007 1:07:53 PM +0100 Shaun Amott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 05:05:46PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm working on an upgrade to a port. It installs a bunch of files,
some in the standard places, a lot in /usr/local/portname. It also
installs a perl modu
Dear colleagues,
is there any way to generate set of /var/db/ports/*/options in their default
state? BATCH=1 will leave this hierarchy untouched, but when installing new
system I would prefer options files to be generated, to be able to look
through, analyze and possibly re-build some ports lat
Hi there,
I've noticed that nomachine has updated their freenx packages for
different distributions. Now they even have amd64 native packages and I
was wondering if that means we will see the amd64 version in freebsd
anytime soon.
When I issue a make install distclean command I get this output:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 05:05:46PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I'm working on an upgrade to a port. It installs a bunch of files, some
> in the standard places, a lot in /usr/local/portname. It also installs a
> perl module in SITE_PERL.
>
> The problem I have is I can't get that perl module
Garrett Cooper wrote:
>Compressing and decompressing packages still takes an inordinate
> amount of time from what I've seen, so it's probably not the best idea
> to do.
If you mean what I think you mean, I agree :)
>What would happen too if one or more of the config files was modified
>
Bakul Shah wrote:
> Can't you do something like
>
> pkg_create ... /dev/stdout | pkg_add -f -C /mnt -
If compression/decompression can be removed from these steps, it would
be exactly what I need.
Even without it it's an improvement, thanks!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
11 matches
Mail list logo