/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol optifd referenced from COPY relocation in /bin/cp when installing sudo port

2007-07-30 Thread FreeBSD-Ports
Hello list, Anybody seen the message below and knows what it means? Couldn't find anything on Goolge. It's a 6.1-RELEASE-p10 system. [EMAIL PROTECTED] sudo # make === WARNING: Vulnerability database out of date, checking anyway === Found saved configuration for sudo-1.6.9.1 === Extracting for

RE: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol optifd referenced fromCOPY relocation in /bin/cp when installing sudo port SOLVED

2007-07-30 Thread Lars Wittebrood
Hello list, This issue is solved. I have compiled the /bin/cp binary from source again and installed it. Still don't know what caused this though. Cheers, Lars. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of FreeBSD-Ports Posted At: Monday, July 30,

[Fwd: Re: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Undefined symbol optifd referenced fromCOPY relocation in /bin/cp when installing sudo port SOLVED]

2007-07-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
---BeginMessage--- Garrett Cooper wrote: Lars Wittebrood wrote: Hello list, This issue is solved. I have compiled the /bin/cp binary from source again and installed it. Still don't know what caused this though. Cheers, Lars. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Python 2.5.1 as default Python version

2007-07-30 Thread Alexander Botero-Lowry
This is just a quick message to note that we have made Python 2.5.1 the default Python version in the FreeBSD ports collection as of about a minute ago. This change also included a considerable amount of work to make support for Python Eggs more useable in the Ports collection, by provoiding a

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2007-07-30 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has

pm3-base, cvsup, etc. on -CURRENT [patch]

2007-07-30 Thread Don Lewis
The Modula 3 ports recently stopped working on -CURRENT because of a change to the i386 machine-dependent kernel code removed a kludge that the pm3 garbage collector was using to find the fault address when accesses were made to protected pages. The correct fix for this is to convert the garbage

security/bro port upgrade submission

2007-07-30 Thread Paul Schmehl
I submitted a PR to update the security/bro port to version1.2 (from 0.8.) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/114999 Just wanted to give a heads up to the committers. This is a complex port that will take a lot of work to test as well as verify my work. -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL

[PATCH] Update freetype2 to 2.3.5

2007-07-30 Thread Jung-uk Kim
Can we update freetype2 to the latest 2.3.5? Patches are attached. Thanks, Jung-uk Kim --- ports/print/freetype2/Makefile 2007-05-22 12:23:54.0 -0400 +++ ports/print/freetype2/Makefile 2007-07-30 14:56:36.0 -0400 @@ -6,8 +6,7 @@ # PORTNAME= freetype2 -PORTVERSION= 2.2.1

Re: pm3-base, cvsup, etc. on -CURRENT [patch]

2007-07-30 Thread Don Lewis
On 30 Jul, Don Lewis wrote: The Modula 3 ports recently stopped working on -CURRENT because of a change to the i386 machine-dependent kernel code removed a kludge that the pm3 garbage collector was using to find the fault address when accesses were made to protected pages. The correct fix for

Re: [PATCH] Update freetype2 to 2.3.5

2007-07-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
Jung-uk Kim wrote: Can we update freetype2 to the latest 2.3.5? Patches are attached. freetype2 2.3.x is coming with GNOME 2.20 in September. We have been testing it in the MarcusCom CVS tree for a few months now. Joe Thanks, Jung-uk Kim

Re: [PATCH] Update freetype2 to 2.3.5

2007-07-30 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Monday 30 July 2007 04:28 pm, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: Jung-uk Kim wrote: Can we update freetype2 to the latest 2.3.5? Patches are attached. freetype2 2.3.x is coming with GNOME 2.20 in September. We have been testing it in the MarcusCom CVS tree for a few months now. Okay, then I

Re: make install a port, but with a package?

2007-07-30 Thread Garrett Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a bad feeling that this has been asked already, and not that long ago, but I can't find it in my mailbox. Is there a variable I can set so that running 'make install' in a port directory will cause it to download the package, if available, and install that