Scot Hetzel wrote:
> Attached is the patch for the ports Makefile, and files/patch-ac. The
> only thing missing is your change for the warning message when the
> PASSFILE option is enabled.
Thanks, I'll take a look at this one.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
__
On 8/7/07, Rakhesh Sasidharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW wrote:
> >> But it will work from /etc/make.conf (using either "=" or "+="), as
> >> long as you don't select LDAP support.
> >
> > Have you actually tried this? A few years ago I couldn't get it, nor
> > several variations on it, to wor
RW wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:07:52 -0700
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> RW wrote:
>>
>>> What I don't understand is why portmaster doesn't leave missing
>>> build-dependencies to the ports-system itself.
>> Because that's part of portmaster's design. It takes each of the buil
RW wrote:
But it will work from /etc/make.conf (using either "=" or "+="), as
long as you don't select LDAP support.
Have you actually tried this? A few years ago I couldn't get it, nor
several variations on it, to work. IIRC there were a lot of other people
who had problems with it on vario
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:49:57 -0400
Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 00:31 +0100, RW wrote:
>
> > In the normal case, the installed bootstrap of a native jdk is
> > going to be itself, so adding a new dependency is going to be
> > undesirable.
>
> I agree, havi
Hi!
Sorry for the long delay with gnash port update to 0.8.0. Many things
happened, but now I finally have some spare time.
Here's preliminary version of 0.8.0 port. It (hopefully) builds and
it (more or less) supports many gnash build options such as chosing
GUI/renderer/media handler and buildi
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 00:31 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:59:09 -0400
> Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > RW wrote:
> > > > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade)
> > > > install java/linux-
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:07:52 -0700
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is why portmaster doesn't leave missing
> > build-dependencies to the ports-system itself.
>
> Because that's part of portmaster's design. It takes each of the build
> and run dep
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:59:09 -0400
Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > RW wrote:
> > > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade)
> > > install java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I
> > > upgrade j
RW wrote:
> What I don't understand is why portmaster doesn't leave missing
> build-dependencies to the ports-system itself.
Because that's part of portmaster's design. It takes each of the build
and run dependencies and handles the compilation and installation
itself. That way you get all of po
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:28 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
> > java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I upgrade
> > jdk15 manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the tools.
> >
> > The way the jdk
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 13:28:53 -0700
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade)
> > install java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I
> > upgrade jdk15 manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the
> > tools.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:39:30 -0500 (CDT)
"Sean C. Farley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The port now depends on the Diablo JDK, but that exposed BUILD_DEPENDS
> line still brings in the diablo-jdk15 port even if a native JDK is
> already available.
>
> It would be nice to use an installed java/jd
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, RW wrote:
Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I upgrade jdk15
manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the tools.
The way the jdk15 makefile works is that it looks for the location o
RW wrote:
> Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
> java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I upgrade
> jdk15 manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the tools.
>
> The way the jdk15 makefile works is that it looks for the location
> of an existi
Both Portmaster and Portmanager (I haven't tried Portupgrade) install
java/linux-sun-jdk15 on an upgrade of java/jdk15. If I upgrade
jdk15 manually it isn't built, so it must be done by the tools.
The way the jdk15 makefile works is that it looks for the location
of an existing jdk installation fo
Could somebody reading these lists please try and point Robert to the
reply I sent him here:
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2007-August/001296.html
Apparently, my mail didn't get through to his address and he doesn't
check the list archives ...
Cheers,
--
,_, | Michael Nottebroc
Ignore this one please ... I figured a way out!
In Makefile
---
pre-fetch:
.if !defined(BATCH) && !defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING) &&
!defined(WITH_PASSFILE)
${SH} pkg-install
.endif
.if !defined(BATCH) && !defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING) &&
defined(WITH_PASSFILE)
${SH} pkg-inst
You would then need to add a warning when this option is enabled, as
according to
doc/tech-notes.txt this option is dangerous:
PASSFILE
_WARNING!_ Turning this on is very dangerous and should
probably not be done, except on single user systems! For
:
I'm stuck here!
I wen
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Could somebody reading these lists please try and point Robert to the
> reply I sent him here:
>
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2007-August/001296.html
>
> Apparently, my mail didn't get through to his address and he doesn't
> chec
Scot Hetzel wrote:
I used the "+=" coz I got the got the impression that adds onto the
existing extra options. And if I want to make this permanent, can I define
it in /etc/make.conf accordingly?
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/mail/pine4}
EXTRA_OPTS+=PASSFILE=.pine.pwd
.endif
But it will work from /et
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 08:56:39 -0500
"Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/7/07, Rakhesh Sasidharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I understand one can compile the email client Pine with an option
> > PASSFILE= to enable the option of saving your mail
> > account passwords. The Pine website
[I sent mail to kde@ and haven't heard anything after several
days, so ]
I'm trying to upgrade to qt-3.3.8_5, and keep stopping here:
c++ -c -pipe -fno-exceptions -Wall -W -O -pipe -g -march=pentium4
-DQT_TABLET_SUPPORT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_SHARED
-I/usr
On 8/7/07, Rakhesh Sasidharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand one can compile the email client Pine with an option
> PASSFILE= to enable the option of saving your mail account
> passwords. The Pine website talks about it and so do many sites all over
> the net.
>
> FreeBSD's ports do not
Hi,
I understand one can compile the email client Pine with an option
PASSFILE= to enable the option of saving your mail account
passwords. The Pine website talks about it and so do many sites all over
the net.
FreeBSD's ports do not seem to offer such an option. I went through the
Pine Mak
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007, at 21:28:10 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> For the ones where there are still files in the pkg directory,
> "corrupted" usually means that the permissions are wrong on those
> files. Try this:
> chown -R root:wheel /var/db/pkg
> find /var/db/pkg -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \;
> fi
26 matches
Mail list logo
