On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 09:21:56PM +0100, Erik Stian Tefre wrote:
> There seems to be a bug (or feature?) somewhere that limits the number of
> unique temporary file names used when storing temporary files that are
> uploaded by posting a form. Looking through my webserver logs of 11
> file
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:02:59 +0200
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:59:15PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > RW p??e v ?t 08. 11. 2007 v 22:06 +:
> >
> > > Stunnel doesn't seem to be working correctly on my 6.2 desktop,
> > > I'm getting the following in /
There seems to be a bug (or feature?) somewhere that limits the number
of unique temporary file names used when storing temporary files that
are uploaded by posting a form. Looking through my webserver logs of
11 file uploads, I find no more than 495 unique temporary file names
which are be
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:24:19AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Greg Minshall wrote:
>> i'd add my two cents for being able to do builds without running as root.
>
>Building as non-root user and then installing as root has its caveats I
> would think..
>
> Pro:
> - Compiling as a non-root us
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:58:25 -0600, Stefan Sperling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I haven't got all the mails in this thread so far because I
haven't been subscribed to ports@ in a while.
I'll try to reply to what I've read in the archives so far.
I'm subscribed again now so I will get fo
Hi all,
I haven't got all the mails in this thread so far because I
haven't been subscribed to ports@ in a while.
I'll try to reply to what I've read in the archives so far.
I'm subscribed again now so I will get followups from here on
without people having to Cc me.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 03:3
Greg Minshall wrote:
i'd add my two cents for being able to do builds without running as root.
Building as non-root user and then installing as root has its
caveats I would think..
Pro:
- Compiling as a non-root user and then installing as root reduces the
security risk of a possible exp
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:31:42 -0600, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:33:55 -0600
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree, because you can't build any ports in /usr/ports as in normal
user anyway. I don't see any
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:31:42 -0600, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:33:55 -0600
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree, because you can't build any ports in /usr/ports as in normal
user anyway. I don't see any good reason to do it eit
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:33:55 -0600
"Jeremy Messenger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree, because you can't build any ports in /usr/ports as in normal
> user anyway. I don't see any good reason to do it either.
Yes you can. You just need to set WRKDIRPREFIX in your /etc/make.conf,
to "/tmp" fo
--On Sunday, November 11, 2007 13:55:42 -0200 Marcelo Araujo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Grant Peel wrote:
Hello,
mod_security seems to have a problem with the MAC Safari browser using
some post statements.
Accoring the the developers, these problems should be fixed in 2.1.4.
Are there any p
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:59:50 -0600, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is very interesting stuff, but I don't see how it would be useful
to a very wide audience. My feeling is that the vast majority of our
users build and/or install ports as root, and I don't see any good
reason fo
Doug Barton wrote:
> This is very interesting stuff, but I don't see how it would be useful to
> a very wide audience. My feeling is that the vast majority of our users
> build and/or install ports as root, and I don't see any good reason for
> that not to be the default practice.
>
> I'll rev
i'd add my two cents for being able to do builds without running as root.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:59:15PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> RW p??e v ?t 08. 11. 2007 v 22:06 +:
>
> > Stunnel doesn't seem to be working correctly on my 6.2 desktop, I'm
> > getting the following in /var/log/messages, and I have no stunnel
> > process
[snip]
> > stunnel: LOG3[926:1346600
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
16 matches
Mail list logo
