Idea about the ports tree included in the release

In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? I think that would greatly in

Re: FreeNX Package

Quoting Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:52:37PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > > I was browsing around looking for alternatives to vnc, and tried to > > experiment with FreeNX. I got this working with Debian, but I notice > > that the port is marked as broken, reason

Re: FreeNX Package

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:27:56PM -0500, dewey hylton wrote: > Quoting Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:52:37PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > > > I was browsing around looking for alternatives to vnc, and tried to > > > experiment with FreeNX. I got this working w

FreeBSD Port: stvef-server-1.20_3

Is this also for star trek Elite force 2?? Greetzz Stefan Konijnenberg Mail. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. 0614942804 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports T

Re: FreeNX Package

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 08:07:52PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:43:53PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:36:49PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:52:37PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > > > > I was browsing around looking for a

Re: FreeNX Package

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:52:37PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > I was browsing around looking for alternatives to vnc, and tried to > experiment with FreeNX. I got this working with Debian, but I notice > that the port is marked as broken, reason being it fails to build wit > X.org 7.2. > > I have

FreeNX Package

I was browsing around looking for alternatives to vnc, and tried to experiment with FreeNX. I got this working with Debian, but I notice that the port is marked as broken, reason being it fails to build wit X.org 7.2. I have package X.Org 7.3 installed. This will probably sound a little idiot

Re: how to distinguish direct/indirect requirements?

Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > You can cd some/port/&&make depends One way only. It would be more useful to know which installed ports directly depend on a specific port. -- Alex Dupre ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mail

Re: Newbie: problem using SUB_LIST in Makefile - SOLVED

Dmitry Marakasov wrote: [...] > For example, you have: > OPTIONS= CWRAPPER "C wrapper" on > > and in /etc/make.conf: > WITHOUT_CWRAPPER= yes # I don't want any *** C wrappers!!! > > Thus, both WITHOUT_CWRAPPER and WITH_CWRAPPER will be defined, but the > port will behave correctly if

Re: FreeBSD Port: cyrus-imapd-2.3.9_1

Hi, > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:19:20 -0800 > Rich Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: richw> Hi. Does a port of Cyrus 2.3.10 exist yet? Or are you aware of any richw> issues with 2.3.10 under FreeBSD for which patches might exist? richw> I'm running Cyrus on a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE system. I

Re: how to distinguish direct/indirect requirements?

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:25:25PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: > > Is there a way to discriminate direct dependencies fro indirect > > ones, except from reading every single Makefile? (and knowing > > to full extent what USE_GNOME

Re: how to distinguish direct/indirect requirements?

On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Is there a way to discriminate direct dependencies fro indirect > ones, except from reading every single Makefile? (and knowing > to full extent what USE_GNOME and similar lines really do take > in as deps) You can cd some/port/&&make

Re: Newbie: problem using SUB_LIST in Makefile - SOLVED

* Rainer Schwarze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > You have the powers of a seer :-) > This is what I was appending to OPTIONS: > CWRAPPER "use C wrapper (no suid perl script needed)" on :)) > > .include > > > > .if !defined(WITHOUT_CWRAPPER) > > Just a newbie question: Is there a reason to use

php4-4.4.7_2: "/usr/ports/www/apachecommon22" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete

Hello, seems to be a bug somewhere (imo php4 or bsd.apache.mk, thus cc'ing apropriate maintainers): - localhost# uname -a FreeBSD localhost 7.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA3 #2: Thu Nov 22 01:14:27 MSK 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MOOS i386 localhost# pwd /usr/ports/lang/php4

Re: Newbie: problem using SUB_LIST in Makefile - SOLVED

Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Rainer Schwarze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> 1) What could be the reason that even XWRAPPER is not handled when the >> replacement is performed? > On my system similar stuff works without problems. First check all [...] I found the problem: The Makefile which I am work

libgtkmozembed.so for Adobe Reader 8

Hello, New Adobe Reader 8 requires some HTML rendering capabilities mainly for his new advertising splash-screen. Therefore it needs that libgtkmozembed.so is present and set in the preferences (without this you get annoying popup at startup but PDF functionality works fine). libgtkmozemb

how to distinguish direct/indirect requirements?

It happened many times to me to ask myself: why I do have port XYZ installed? surely "something needs it", but what? "pkg_info -r/-R" are of little help, because every dependency of every dependency (and other ranks of indirect dependencies too) are simply registered as direct dependencies, so that