On 12/16/07, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:09:07 -0600
> "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/13/07, Bernard Nowakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > The problem is: I run cvsup, go into /usr/ports and type make
> > > index. After some m
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:09:07 -0600
"Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/13/07, Bernard Nowakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying to find a solution to my problem via Google or
> > freebsd-ports' group archive but maybe you can help.
> >
> > The problem is
Hi,
On 14/12/2007, Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ad_libvorbis.c:238: error: too few arguments to function 'vorbis_synthesis'
> gmake[1]: *** [ad_libvorbis.o] Error 1
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory
Can't reproduce this error here. Given you are using default options,
mplayer will ge
> Side note the more we discuss this the more obvious it becomes to me
> it has to be in some OO lang and since C++ is the only one in the base
> system it kind of forces C++ to be the implementation lang.
You may want to take a look at some of the work OpenBSD has done
recently; I believe they ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> you do not maintain any ports
Incorrect I have one that is currently officially pending in the
backlog created by the freeze (the PR is sitting their waiting).
Also as soon that port is done and any errors I may of made as it
being my first port I
Frank J. Laszlo wrote:
I rarely post on -ports anymore, due to the lack of order and respect
for those who actually DO SOMETHING, and not just bitch and moan about
things that should be done.
Let me also make another point related to this sentence. While
obviously there should be respect fo
Frank J. Laszlo wrote:
I rarely post on -ports anymore, due to the lack of order and respect
for those who actually DO SOMETHING, and not just bitch and moan about
things that should be done.
I remember it was only a few short years ago that ports@ was completely
inundated by receiving every
On Saturday 15 December 2007 10:41:14 Frank J. Laszlo wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > And get this
> >
> > I have been around the computer world using *nix long before freebsd came
> > along. That does not mean what I say today deserves to be judged other
> > than on its face value. However wha
David Southwell wrote:
And get this
I have been around the computer world using *nix long before freebsd came
along. That does not mean what I say today deserves to be judged other than
on its face value. However what over 40 years in IT has encouraged me to
think that those who invite peopl
On Saturday 15 December 2007 08:04:31 Frank J. Laszlo wrote:
> Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> > Your correct that there are 2 seperate issues at play here but there
> > is a common solution (and to be honest I have yet to see any
> > feature/issue discussed in any of the re-engineering threads that
> >
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Your correct that there are 2 seperate issues at play here but there
is a common solution (and to be honest I have yet to see any
feature/issue discussed in any of the re-engineering threads that
doesn't at least become more manageable under this general design
concept I
On Friday 14 December 2007 14:20:24 Remko Lodder wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > On Friday 14 December 2007 08:08:54 Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >> --On Friday, December 14, 2007 12:19:06 + RW
> >>
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:34:58 -0500
> >>>
> >>> "Aryeh M. Frie
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 10:27:30AM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> > I'm trying to walk through the tutorial of Boost.Python
> > (the devel/boost-python port)... and unless I'm running
> > out of coffe right now, it seems as if the boost port
> > is not fully installed/specified!
> >
> > Isn't boost
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Phillip N. thusly...
>
> Im not really reading this threads..
>
> But.. has this something to do with this?
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-April/039802.html
O' don't scare me. Yet Again. Naughty boy.
It was quite near the end I t
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:34:06PM -0500, Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:58:57 +0100
> Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > One shortcoming is the lack of locking making parallell builds a bit unsafe.
> > If you try to build both port A and port B at the same time, and bot
The following diff simply compiles flu with gcc34 on os versions where is was
previously marked broken.
--- Makefile.orig 2007-12-15 05:08:43.0 -0500
+++ Makefile2007-12-15 05:09:29.0 -0500
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
.include
.if ${OSVERSION} >= 700042
-BROKEN=
> I'm trying to walk through the tutorial of Boost.Python
> (the devel/boost-python port)... and unless I'm running
> out of coffe right now, it seems as if the boost port
> is not fully installed/specified!
>
> Isn't boost supposed to come with a tools/build/v2
> directory? Where is it?
Unless y
On Friday 14 December 2007 18:44:09 Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On December 14, 2007 5:21:02 PM -0800 Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Information does indeed need to be gathered, and while even the ports
> > list will only grab a small percentage of FreeBSD users, other options
> > would likely gr
18 matches
Mail list logo
