-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Barton wrote:
> Perhaps it's implicit somewhere in your stuff, but one thing that I
> have not seen mentioned is along the lines of what Mike Makonnen
> is doing with his prototype new installer. Namely divorcing the
> parts of the system that do
Yet again, I'm having fun with these WITH_* options, and I can't seem to
coerce the configure phase to enable sound with this port.
My config after hacking the Makefile looks like:
# This file is auto-generated by 'make config'.
# No user-servicable parts inside!
# Options for xpilot-ng-client-4.
Perhaps it's implicit somewhere in your stuff, but one thing that I have
not seen mentioned is along the lines of what Mike Makonnen is doing with
his prototype new installer. Namely divorcing the parts of the system that
do the work and the UI.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=6270
On Dec 20, 2007 1:29 AM, Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 2007 12:16 AM, Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:54:05 -0800, Xin LI wrote
> >>>
> I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /u
Hi,
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, I thought
of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one after the
compilation is finished.
This should be much faster and also should do some kind o
defragmentation. I simpl
Кутейников Дмитрий píše v čt 20. 12. 2007 v 00:04 +0300:
> Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find
> package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much
> time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the
> package server dif
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:53:40 -0500
Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:13:16PM +, RW wrote:
>
> > I would have thought that the ".if ${ARCH}" method was the only
> > sensible way of doing it. Packages are built without any options
> > set.
>
> They are built
--On Wednesday, December 19, 2007 15:53:40 -0500 Wesley Shields
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:13:16PM +, RW wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:13:06 -0500
Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think it matters really, but is probably a matter of personal
>
Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find
package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much
time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the
package server differ. I've spent a lot of time trying to guess, what
command I sho
On Sun, 16.12.2007 at 22:59:55 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> This is a progress report from the current teTeX maintainer who is
> trying to update TeX in the ports tree to TeXLive. As I explained,
> if we go with the finer-grained package model, over 1000 ports have
> to be added at a time, so t
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:13:16PM +, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:13:06 -0500
> Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think it matters really, but is probably a matter of personal
> > preference. The only problem with using an option that I see is that
> > if the user
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:13:06 -0500
Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think it matters really, but is probably a matter of personal
> preference. The only problem with using an option that I see is that
> if the user has no idea if (s)he is on a 64bit platform and turns the
> opt
On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Jeremy Chadwick said:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:29:40PM -, Barry Byrne wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: 19 December 2007 11:34
> > > To: Barry Byrne
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PRO
Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:03:23PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> --On Wednesday, December 19, 2007 16:59:37 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Schmehl wrote:
Is there a way to include a patch as an option to a port? I maintain
the secu
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:03:23PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Wednesday, December 19, 2007 16:59:37 +0100 Pietro Cerutti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>> Is there a way to include a patch as an option to a port? I maintain
>>> the security/barnyard port. There's
--On Wednesday, December 19, 2007 16:59:37 +0100 Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
Is there a way to include a patch as an option to a port? I maintain
the security/barnyard port. There's a patch that is necessary for
barnyard to work correctly on a 64bit system.
Hi!
We're unable to get SSL-support working with the 5.0.51 client. The
server (5.0.51) supports SSL and we are able to connect with SSL-
support from clients on servers running mysql-client-5.0.37 and mysql-
client-5.0.45.
But with mysql-client-5.0.51 we are unable to connect to other serv
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, I thought
> of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one after the
> compilation is finished.
>
> This should be much faster and also should do some kind o
> defragmentation. I simply cannot be
Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 12:16 AM, Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:54:05 -0800, Xin LI wrote
>>>
I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /usr/local/etc/ports.conf)
is a very handy feature that makes it much easier
Jockey Kyd wrote:
> Hi.
>
> It seems that misc/chmlib doesn't include any executable to install, say,
> enum_chmLib, extract_chmLib, chm_http, etc. There's also no option left for us
> to control this installation. But these utilities are so useful that can
> replace any other chm readers from my
Chuck Robey ha scritto:
I'm lost. Anyone gotten the enigmail-seamonkey port to work?
Well, I suppose you never manually installed (or googled about
installing) an xpi with seamonkey. Simply "File->Open" the xpi, how
could it be simpler?
--
Alex Dupre
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:43:09 +0300 Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>
>> FYI
>>
>> => Attempting to fetch from
>> http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/. fetch:
>>
>>
http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/c
Paul Schmehl wrote:
> Is there a way to include a patch as an option to a port? I maintain
> the security/barnyard port. There's a patch that is necessary for
> barnyard to work correctly on a 64bit system. I'm wondering if I can
> use OPTIONS to make this patch optional if the system is 64 bit,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:53:15 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote
> wondering if I can use OPTIONS to make this patch optional if the
> system is 64 bit, but I'm not sure what the syntax would be inside
> the if statement.
>
> .if defined(WITH_64BIT)
> do-patch: patchname
> .endif
>
> I assume the patch
Is there a way to include a patch as an option to a port? I maintain the
security/barnyard port. There's a patch that is necessary for barnyard to work
correctly on a 64bit system. I'm wondering if I can use OPTIONS to make this
patch optional if the system is 64 bit, but I'm not sure what th
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:37:52AM -, Barry Byrne wrote:
> Perhaps it's something with my system (6.2Release p-9), but I've not had an
> issue like this before.
UTF-8 isspace fix is in -current and 7.x but is not in 6.x
--
http://ache.pp.ru/
___
fr
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:43:09 +0300 Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> FYI
>
> => Attempting to fetch from
> http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/.
> fetch:
> http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz:
>
> size mismatch: expected 2
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:29:40PM -, Barry Byrne wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 19 December 2007 11:34
> > To: Barry Byrne
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTE
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 December 2007 11:34
> To: Barry Byrne
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Checked the patched file (NLS.php) and I had something like t
You have just received a virtual postcard from a family member!
.
You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:
.
[1]http://www2.postcards.org/?a91-valets-cloud-31337
.
If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at ht
You have just received a virtual postcard from a family member!
.
You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:
.
[1]http://www2.postcards.org/?a91-valets-cloud-31337
.
If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at ht
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:37:52AM -, Barry Byrne wrote:
> Just portupgraded from horde-base-3.1.5 to 3.1.5_1 and ended up with an
> parse error in NSL.php.
>
> Checked the patched file (NLS.php) and I had something like this;
>
> \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
> \xa0
On Dec 19, 2007 12:16 AM, Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:54:05 -0800, Xin LI wrote
> >
> >> I think that ports-mgmt/portconf (a.k.a. /usr/local/etc/ports.conf)
> >> is a very handy feature that makes it much easier to store port options
Hi,
Just portupgraded from horde-base-3.1.5 to 3.1.5_1 and ended up with an
parse error in NSL.php.
Checked the patched file (NLS.php) and I had something like this;
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0if(NLS::getCharset() == "UTF-8"){
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0
Hi.
It seems that misc/chmlib doesn't include any executable to install, say,
enum_chmLib, extract_chmLib, chm_http, etc. There's also no option left for us
to control this installation. But these utilities are so useful that can
replace any other chm readers from my point of view, especially chm_
35 matches
Mail list logo
