I cannot install jdk16 under freeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p9 due to the following error:
There was an error trying to initialize the HPI library. Could not create the
Java virtual machine. gmake[3]: *** [product] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving
directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk16/work/control/build/bsd-i586/hots
Hi,
I need to know which is the latest stable FreeBSD release(6.2 ?) and
does it goes well with Dell 2950 ?
Thanks
Navneet
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send an
This security advisory contains numerous vulnerabilities with proposed
patches related to xorg-server and libXfont.
Is it expected to be committed? (flz CC'ed)
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-January/031918.html
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-January/032099.html
w
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 14:07 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
> 2008/1/21, Bruce M Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I still haven't rebuilt everything on my system, and have /usr/X11R6
> > symlinked to /usr/local,
> > so libchk generates a lot of false positives.
> >
> > maybe consider removing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vivek Khera wrote:
> Can I get a little love for ports/119544 and get someone to commit it?
> thanks! It will simplify my deployment process to have it as a package.
DONE.
Cheers,
- --
Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 21:10 +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Hi Marius,
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100
> Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior
> > to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in
> > libstdc++
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:54 -0500
"Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I right to assume that this is *not* i386? I have 7-PRERELEASE (i386)
> cvsup'ed on January 22, early morning EST, and mred built from vanilla
> 372 sources (per your earlier recommendation) on Januar
I was cloning the linux kernel git tree on a gjournal'd partition.
After git did its usual initial stuff it spat some errors during check
out:
...
Checking 23062 files out...
error: git-checkout-index: unable to create file
include/asm-arm/arch-integrator/cm.h (Interrupted system call)
100% (23062
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:10:14PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Hi Marius,
>
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100
> Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior
> > to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in
> > libs
Can I get a little love for ports/119544 and get someone to commit it?
thanks! It will simplify my deployment process to have it as a package.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a server with round about 200 installed Ports. I need
> to setup a second server with the same, but slightly newer,
> ports recompiled from source.
>
> Is there an easy way to crate a port list
Use the Root and Leaf sections from 'portmaster -l'
(ports-mgmt/port
> Eric L Chen writes:
Eric> Hi,
Eric> I think use "/usr/bin/env bash" is better than "/usr/local/bin/bash"
in
Eric> portability.
True, but is this reported as P.R., hmm...?
Thanks
--
Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल http://wahjava.wordpress.com/
·-- ·- ·--- ·-
Hello,
I have a server with round about 200 installed Ports. I need
to setup a second server with the same, but slightly newer,
ports recompiled from source.
Is there an easy way to crate a port list with compile options
and feed a build command on the second server with it?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Can somebody please commit ports/119664 ? It is an important bugfix,
without nobody can install Rubygems.
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:18:31 +0800
"Eric L. Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think use "/usr/bin/env bash" is better than "/usr/local/bin/bash"
> in portability.
I concur. I have written several scripts that are used on various
operating systems and found using the '/usr/bin/env' notation in
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:44:05AM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> [to recap: drscheme, (which is an IDE that runs under the "mred"
> runtime, built from ports/lang/drscheme (or actually manually
> from a personal copy of that Makefile that builds the current
> release: 372, rather
Hi Marius,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100
Marius Strobl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior
> to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in
> libstdc++ but also in headers that are installed beneath
> /usr/include/c++. So the
Hi,
I think use "/usr/bin/env bash" is better than "/usr/local/bin/bash" in
portability.
/Eric
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 02:23 +0530, आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered a problem with gdm. The file
> "/usr/local/etc/gdm/Xsession" needs "/usr/local/bin/bash" for its
> execution, w
18 matches
Mail list logo