Yesterday I updated OpenOffice and now whenever I run portmaster -Da it
reinstalls it for no reason I can see. Thanks to ccache that doesn't take more
than an hour. Still it's a /very/ annoying habit.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
> > You might have noticed a thread on the mailing list called "ports system
> > woes". The submitter pointed out an inefficiency in pkg_delete routine,
> > that parses the whole /var/db/pkg over and over again for every
> > dependency of a package being removed.
> >
> > Attached is a patch by rd
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:18:00 +0100, Michel Talon wrote
> > In fact last year i wrote a python script which reads all the
> > /var/db/pkg/+CONTENTS files, and fixes all the +REQUIRED_BY files,
> > assuming they are corrupted. Moreover it follows the MOVED file.
>
> So you basically reimplemented
> The pkg database in /var/db/pkg stores two-way dependency chains.
> Each port lists all it's dependencies in +CONTENTS file, and all ports
> that depend on it in +REQUIRED_BY. When you delete package, all
> dependencies of deleted package are iterated and the name of deleted
> package is removed
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Alexander Leidinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The make clean is wrong. It tries to clean in PORTSDIR, not in
> WRKDIRPREFIX. You need to specify WRKDIRPREFIX at every make invocation.
I've set WRKDIRPREFIX in make.conf. And it cleans
${WRKDIRPREFIX}/usr/
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:49:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > You might have noticed a thread on the mailing list called "ports system
> > > woes". The submitter pointed out an inefficiency in pkg_delete routine,
> > > that parses the whole /var/db/pkg over and over again for every
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] píše v ne 30. 03. 2008 v 23:49 -0700:
> Notice pkg_info in ^T output during "Checking if x11/rxvt-unicode already
> installed" phase. This one takes awhile. The actual command is:
> `/usr/sbin/pkg_info -q -O x11/rxvt-unicode`
> real0m37.697s
> user0m0.125s
> sys 0m
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Yesterday I updated OpenOffice and now whenever I run portmaster -Da it
reinstalls it for no reason I can see.
Well it doesn't decide to do things for no reason. :) Somehow it
believes that there is a newer version. What does 'portmaster -L' say?
(Just the part about op
Doug Barton wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Yesterday I updated OpenOffice and now whenever I run portmaster -Da
it reinstalls it for no reason I can see.
Well it doesn't decide to do things for no reason. :) Somehow it
believes that there is a newer version. What does 'portmaster -L' say?
(Ju
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] píše v po 31. 03. 2008 v 01:00 -0700:
> for all this GNOME/GTK stuff? Insane, I say. Look at the depndencies field
> for `make search` results -- atrocious. How often do you care about a port
> depending on xproto, Xlib, x..., instead of just Xorg?
Actually there's an ongoing ef
[EMAIL PROTECTED] píše v po 31. 03. 2008 v 01:23 -0700:
> > Quick solution would be to gather all depnames for the deleted package,
> > and then do a single pass over /var/db/pkg entries looking for origins.
> >
> > Ultimate solution would be to implement a database which would
> > concentrate or
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Yesterday I updated OpenOffice and now whenever I run portmaster -Da
it reinstalls it for no reason I can see.
Well it doesn't decide to do things for no reason. :) Somehow it
believes that there is a newer version. What does '
Hi Freebsd-porters,
I have a question about the New-port procedure.
On 17 feb I created this port
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120757 , hoping to see it soon in
the official FreeBSD ports tree. I tested the port against the rules in the
FreeBSD porters handbook so I knew it worked
Roman Divacky wrote:
> To my eye, it doesn't look like matchbyorigin() could be
> re-implemented
> to be faster with little effort, but could somebody have a quick look
> as well? Would doing mmap() instead of scanning file line-by-line be
> any faster? (though I'm not saying it's a great idea)
I
Hello,
Thank you for your email. I am out of the office from Friday, March 28 through
Monday, March 31, returning on Tuesday, April 1.
Best regards,
John Amundsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
Norberto Meijome wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mon Nov 5 08:09:34 2007]
>> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2
>> $ sudo make -DWITH_DEBUG=2 -DWITH_SYSTEM_FREETYPE -DWITH_CUPS
>> -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA package
>>
>> []
>>
>> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/work/OOG680_m6/odk/pack/gendocu
>> dm
Hi,
Could some kind committer please review/reject:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120745
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=121187
The submission is >4 weeks old. The current maintainer appears uninterested
in reviewing it.
Thanks.
--
Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
18 matches
Mail list logo
