On Wed, 7 May 2008 16:11:12 -0700 Jo Rhett wrote:
> Yes, they updated the port yesterday apparently.
No, the port won't be updated until pkg-plist (and the patch at the
PR) is fixed.
> On May 6, 2008, at 12:34 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > My tinderbox gives:
> > -
> > =
Yes, they updated the port yesterday apparently.
On May 6, 2008, at 12:34 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
My tinderbox gives:
-
===> Building package for cfengine-2.2.6
Creating package /tmp/packages/All/cfengine-2.2.6.tbz
Registering depends: db46-4.6.21
`sh cflags "optimize='-O2 -pipe -march=pentiumpro
-fno-strict-aliasing'" globals.o` -DPIC -fPIC globals.c
CCCMD = cc -DPERL_CORE -c
-DAPPLLIB_EXP="/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN" -DHAS_FPSETMASK
-DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/usr/loc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 12:43:08 -0400
> Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I have been scouring all the data I can, to find printers that do duplex
>> printing (that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Tue, 06 May 2008 12:43:08 -0400
> Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I have been scouring all the data I can, to find printers that do duplex
>> printing (that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:43:08PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> 1) I can't determine which (if any) of the PIPS ports support the RX680, and
>
> Based on a quick look at the pips ports, the RX680 is not currently
> supported. I
On May 7, 2008, at 4:04 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Gé Weijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I tried to build 'valgrind' in a jail environment. The Makefile
tries to
make sure that /proc is mounted before it build valgrind, which is
fine, but
the way it
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 19:42:31 Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:13:59 Sean C. Farley wrote:
> >> On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> >>> /usr/bin/ld: ./obj/../soobj/gs.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be
> >>> used when m
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andy Fawcett wrote:
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:13:59 Sean C. Farley wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: ./obj/../soobj/gs.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be
used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
On amd64, you need to remove
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:13:59 Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> > /usr/bin/ld: ./obj/../soobj/gs.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be
> > used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
>
> On amd64, you need to remove the FT_BRIDGE option to compile.
On Tue, 06 May 2008 12:43:08 -0400
Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have been scouring all the data I can, to find printers that do duplex
> printing (that means doublesided printing). I found 3 models, but two of them
> (the HP C7280
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:22:09AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:30 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:30 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:19:24AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > Sorry - should have been more specific than the generic "stuck"
> > description. Top shows the process state as "fu_msg" and it is not
> > consuming any processor resources, just s
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:30 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:19:24AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > > > Sorry - should have been
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 07:30 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:19:24AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > > Sorry - should have been more specific than the generic "stuck"
> > > description. Top shows the p
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:19:24AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> Sorry - should have been more specific than the generic "stuck"
> description. Top shows the process state as "fu_msg" and it is not
> consuming any processor resources, just seemingly sits there idling.
> Output from ps is:
>
> UID PID
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: ./obj/../soobj/gs.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be
used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
On amd64, you need to remove the FT_BRIDGE option to compile. I have
not had time to look into what is actually happening or
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:20:17AM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > The symptom is as described above - the gvfs-fuse-daemon processes do
> > not exit cleanly and more processes continue to build-up whenever I
> > complete an X-
Dear colleagues,
net/asterisk from today's ports tree does not build at least under
RELENG_7/i386 when CPUTYPE is set to (at least) k8 or i686 in
/etc/make.conf:
[LD] abstract_jb.o acl.o aescrypt.o aeskey.o aestab.o alaw.o app.o
ast_expr2.o ast_expr2f.o asterisk.o astmm.o astobj2.o audiohoo
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Gé Weijers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to build 'valgrind' in a jail environment. The Makefile tries to
> make sure that /proc is mounted before it build valgrind, which is fine, but
> the way it does it won't work in a jail because /sbin/mount d
On May 7, 2008, at 2:15 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Cooper wrote:
| On May 7, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
|
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Garrett Cooper wrote:
|
| [...]
|
|> | Aryeh,
|> | What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Cooper wrote:
| On May 7, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
|
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Garrett Cooper wrote:
|
| [...]
|
|> | Aryeh,
|> | What are your CFLAGS?
|>
|> If you mean the ones from /etc/
Qpopper 4.0.12 has recently been released. However there are a few
bugs in that version. It can be made to work, but it requires
altering the format of the config file. I have been working with the
qpopper developers to get those fixed and a new config file parser has
been created that w
On May 6, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Gé Weijers wrote:
Hello,
I tried to build 'valgrind' in a jail environment. The Makefile
tries to make sure that /proc is mounted before it build valgrind,
which is fine, but the way it does it won't work in a jail because /
sbin/mount does not show anything use
On May 7, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Cooper wrote:
[...]
| Aryeh,
| What are your CFLAGS?
If you mean the ones from /etc/make.conf:
CPUTYPE?=nocona
KERNCONF=MONSTER
NO_LPR=true
NO_PROFILE=true
NO_CLEAN=true
# added
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Cooper wrote:
| On May 7, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
|
| Using the default options I get the following when attempting to
rebuild the latest version of print/ghostscript-gpl on 8-CURRENT (AMD64):
|
| cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAV
On May 7, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Using the default options I get the following when attempting to
rebuild the latest version of print/ghostscript-gpl on 8-CURRENT
(AMD64):
cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_HYPOT -DHAVE_FONTCONFI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Using the default options I get the following when attempting to rebuild
the latest version of print/ghostscript-gpl on 8-CURRENT (AMD64):
cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_HYPOT -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -O2 -pipe
-march=nocona -fno-strict-aliasing -DUPD_SIGN
28 matches
Mail list logo
