On a small FreeBSD 6.3 system (Pentium I, 120 MHz, 32 MB)
i have postfix running, a bit of perl and ... bash
I did an upgrade after reading:
20080605:
AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (ie: YOU)
AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a result of the upgrade to gettext-0.17, the shared library versio
Hi,
The 1.0.8 version is currently out of date and contains a bug.
could this be updated to the current version if you are still
maintaining the code?
thnx
Maarten Verbeek
ORDINA Belgium
Contact Details
B-3001 Heverlee, Interleuvenlaan 15H
B-3560 Lummen, Bosstraat 52/2
B-9820 Merelbeke,
Synopsis: Test bug report (please ignore)
State-Changed-From-To: closed->Open
State-Changed-By: edwin
State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 10 12:59:37 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
tracing issue with edit-pr
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37375
___
fr
Synopsis: Test bug report (please ignore)
State-Changed-From-To: Open->open
State-Changed-By: edwin
State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 10 13:00:14 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
Fix capitalization
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37375
___
freebsd-port
Synopsis: Test bug report (please ignore)
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: edwin
State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 10 13:00:36 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
Trace edit-pr issue
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37375
___
freebsd-p
Synopsis: Test bug report (please ignore)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->edwin
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jun 10 13:00:49 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Chase edit-pr issue
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37375
_
Hi,
I've problems to get nntpcache working on amd64 architecture. Are there
known issues or suggestions to get it working.
The original domain (nntpcache.org/com) is no longer allocated, so where can
I get any informations?
Thanks
Reinhard Haller
-
Dipl. Inform. Reinhard Haller
INTERACTIVE
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 01:28:05PM +0200, Verbeek, Maarten wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 1.0.8 version is currently out of date and contains a bug.
> could this be updated to the current version if you are still
> maintaining the code?
I was recently told that the current maintainers address bounces by
s
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 08:54:49PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Jeffrey Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > When some project includes a contrib/ directory with its source where
> > should those canonically be installed?
> >
> > /usr/local/share/$PORT
> >
> > or
> >
> >/usr/local/sh
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:43:36 +0200
"Reinhard Haller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've problems to get nntpcache working on amd64 architecture. Are
> there known issues or suggestions to get it working.
>
> The original domain (nntpcache.org/com) is no longer allocated, so
> where can I
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am
particularly interested in a comparison between old and new indexes
built locally: the only diff should be in audio/festvox-hvs [1].
The patches remove mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kris Kennaway wrote:
| Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
| for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
| faster to execute.
True, but the for is not even guaranteed to exist (WITHOUT_RES
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| Kris Kennaway wrote:
|
| | Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
| | for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
| | faster to execute.
|
| True, but the for is not eve
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:45:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
faster to execute.
I don't have INDEX in all of my systems, so I am only ta
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| Kris Kennaway wrote:
|
| | Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
| | for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
| | faster to execute.
|
| True,
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:45:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
faster to execute.
I don't have INDEX in all of my s
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
> builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am
> particularly interested in a comparison between old and new indexes
> built locally: th
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am
particularly interested in a comparison between old and new indexes
buil
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:52:01PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Alex Kozlov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >> Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
> >> builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:52:01PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversal
Kris Kennaway wrote:
The new 'make describe' target runs entirely using shell
builtins apart from the need to sed pkg-descr to extract the WWW [2]
[2] Actually I am not happy with this but couldn't think of a way to do
it better. Having to fork the subshell costs about 60 seconds of system
Hi all,
Two questions:
1) Is it possible to determine the date a port/package is installed?
2) How can I delete all the ports/packages installed after a certain date?
Thanks a lot :)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:09:33AM -0500, Novembre wrote:
> Two questions:
> 1) Is it possible to determine the date a port/package is installed?
ls -ld /var/db/pkg/, use the mtime of the directory.
> 2) How can I delete all the ports/packages installed after a certain date?
Use a combination of
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Novembre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Two questions:
> 1) Is it possible to determine the date a port/package is installed?
> 2) How can I delete all the ports/packages installed after a certain date?
>
> Thanks a lot :)
1. Please don't cross-post.
2.
24 matches
Mail list logo
