in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Gerard thusly...
>
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:40:38 -0700 David Southwell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just wondered when an upgrade to 5.10.0 could be expected.
>
> Perhaps they are planning on releasing it with, and hopefully
> including it in the FreeBSD
On Thursday 10 July 2008 14:16:02 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 10 J
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700
"Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote:
> >> On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:09:23 Wesley Shields wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jul
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:53:13PM +0200, Anders Trob??ck wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:34:39 -0700
> "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Anders Trob??ck
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:54:15 +0200
> > > Anders Troback <
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 07:14:26AM +0200, Helko Glathe wrote:
> Am Freitag 11 Juli 2008 03:05:18 schrieb Guido Falsi:
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> > > Guido Falsi wrote:
> > >> I just disabled the attack and forgery site checks
> > >
> > > Exactly which prefs are you referring to there?
> >
> > in the
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:58:26 +0300
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:53:13PM +0200, Anders Trob??ck wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:34:39 -0700
> > "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Anders Trob??ck
> > >
I updated my sytem lately and rrdtool is now at 1.3.0_1
But now mailgraph is showing me the graphs only without the text!
Do I need to change something?
Regards,
Johan Hendriks
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
Hello everyone,
I just take a quick look at the portmon report about my first port submit,
omegaT[1], a translation memory editor.
As I can see, portmon reports a 'failed to build' state for the amd64-8-latest
environment, but if I took a close look, the log file looks ok (the port and
the paka
On Friday 11 July 2008, Rodrigo OSORIO (ros) said:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I just take a quick look at the portmon report about my first port
> submit, omegaT[1], a translation memory editor. As I can see,
> portmon reports a 'failed to build' state for the amd64-8-latest
> environment, but if I took
>>On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Johan Hendriks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I updated my sytem lately and rrdtool is now at 1.3.0_1
>>
>> But now mailgraph is showing me the graphs only without the text!
>Since rrdtool 1.3.0, there is not bundle font anymore. Instead
>it uses pange/fontconfig.
Hi,
As usual my question can be answered by a meticulous read of the report, so
please ignore my post.
Regards
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:42:34AM +0200, Rodrigo OSORIO (ros) wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I just take a quick look at the portmon report about my first port submit,
> omegaT[1], a
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Johan Hendriks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I updated my sytem lately and rrdtool is now at 1.3.0_1
>
> But now mailgraph is showing me the graphs only without the text!
Since rrdtool 1.3.0, there is not bundle font anymore. Instead
it uses pange/fontconfig. Could
In response to "Rodrigo OSORIO (ros)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I just take a quick look at the portmon report about my first port submit,
> omegaT[1], a translation memory editor.
> As I can see, portmon reports a 'failed to build' state for the
> amd64-8-latest environment, b
Hi
games/warsow and games/warsow-data are out of date and the mouse isn't
working with the version in ports, however there is 0.42 available. Do
you have any plans on updating the port?
Sandra
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700
>
> "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > On Thursday 10 July 2008 11:43:20 David Southwell wrote:
> > >> On Thurs
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: openoffice.org-3.0.20080711
Committers on the hook:
ale maho sem skv
Most recent CVS update was:
U Mk/bsd.php.m
On Friday 11 July 2008 06:16:24 Florian Smeets wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > However I notice an oddity.
> >
> > Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config,
> > pkg_info reports that
> > cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4
> > is installed.
> >
> > It does not look right.
>
> Do
David Southwell wrote:
However I notice an oddity.
Despite having installed cvsup, turning X11 support on via config, pkg_info
reports that
cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4
is installed.
It does not look right.
Do you have WITHOUT_X11 set in /etc/make.conf? That would explain it,
see the Makefile.
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700
> >
> > "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Jul 11, 2008, at 4:01 AM, Parv wrote:
Perhaps they are planning on releasing it with, and hopefully
including it in the FreeBSD-7.1 release.
That would be darn too long not to install on my own (unless 7.1 is
coming out in a month)!
Not being one of the folks working on the port, I can'
On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote:
When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have
a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and
evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this.
on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following:
> David Southwell wrote:
>> Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)?
>> They may have some bearing on the problem.
>>
>> 20080701:
>> AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion*
>> AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROT
On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote:
When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have a
perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and
evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this.
As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleedi
Daniel Dvořák пишет:
Hi Sergey,
may the problem with "lock pid_file" messages be connected with running
watchquagga daemon ?
Here is what I have got in rc.conf file:
quagga_enable="YES"
quagga_flags="-d"
quagga_daemons="zebra ospfd ospf6d bgpd" Is this order okay ?
It's a co
Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
ch> This time I'm copying Hiroki Sato, who is the fellow who did the last few
ch> ghostscript commits ... why? Because I just tried to compile
ch> ghostscript-8.62.tar.bz2 directly from the version that was downloaded by
the
ch> por
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: openoffice.org-3.0.20080711
Committers on the hook:
acm ale knu lth maho miwi sem skv
Most recent CVS update wa
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH thusly...
>
>
> On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
>> When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't
>> have a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out
>> and evangelize FreeBSD when there are d
On Friday 11 July 2008 07:57:11 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have a
> > perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and
> > evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like t
On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700
>
> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700
> > >
> > > "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
David Southwell writes:
> > As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge
> > Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.)
>
> That sounds a bit complacent to me. I hope others are not likely
> to be so dismissive of the needs of others.
And sometimes,
On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700
>
> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -0700
> > >
> > > "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Friday 11 July 2008 10:05:10 David Southwell wrote:
> On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700
> >
> > David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 July 2008 01:57:37 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:14:42 -
On Friday 11 July 2008 09:13:21 Robert Huff wrote:
> David Southwell writes:
> > > As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge
> > > Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.)
> >
> > That sounds a bit complacent to me. I hope others are not likely
> > to be s
Plees commit port sysutils/ldap-account-manager
ports/125452
--
---
Vasiliy P. Melnik VPM-RIPE, VPM-UANIC
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.or
David Southwell wrote:
But this may be a clue
Here is what happened.. in the past it seemed to core dump immediately - but
now it transpires the dumping takes place only once the connection is made. I
incorrectly assumed all was OK when I got the "Rejected by Server" message
but jumped too qui
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Jul 11, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Remko Lodder wrote:
So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all
dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand
that we want to have this as soon as possible, but also do keep in
mind that we would like to make sure as much a
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:16:48PM +0300, Vasiliy P. Melnik wrote:
> Plees commit port sysutils/ldap-account-manager
>
> ports/125452
The PR was submitted on Wed, 9 Jul 2008. Please give lippe time to test
it out and get it committed. Given that this is a volunteer effort and
he may have other
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:12:12 -0700
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 11 July 2008 10:05:10 David Southwell wrote:
> > On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700
> > >
> > > David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > O
David Southwell wrote:
If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend their
time arguing and we would have none atall.
It is not as though Perl is an obscure bit of buggy code that none uses.
If there is a request then simply a response to your last question is neede
On Friday 11 July 2008 12:26:52 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:12:12 -0700
>
> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 11 July 2008 10:05:10 David Southwell wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 July 2008 07:24:39 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:23:54 -0700
On Friday 11 July 2008 12:06:57 Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Remko Lodder wrote:
> > So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all
> > dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand
> > that we want to have this as soon as possible, but also d
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:05 PM, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 11 July 2008 12:26:52 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:12:12 -0700
>>
>> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Friday 11 July 2008 10:05:10 David Southwell wrote:
>> > > On Friday 11
On Friday 11 July 2008 14:02:09 Remko Lodder wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > On Friday 11 July 2008 11:53:50 you wrote:
> >> David Southwell wrote:
> >>> If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend
> >>> their time arguing and we would have none atall.
> >>>
> >>> It i
David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 11 July 2008 14:02:09 Remko Lodder wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 11 July 2008 11:53:50 you wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend
their time arguing and we would have none atall.
It is not
Yuri wrote:
I got the error below during portupgrade -aP.
Why wouldn't portupgrade just upgrade neon?
'pkgdb -F' doesn;t find any problems.
Yuri
===> Installing for neon28-0.28.2_1
===> neon28-0.28.2_1 conflicts with installed package(s):
neon26-0.26.4_1
They install files into
Yves Guérin wrote:
Hello,
I redo the rc.d script
#!/bin/sh
# PatrioteBSD - Yves Guerin - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2008-07-10
#
# JAMAIS TESTE AVEC upsd_enable="yes"
# NEVER TESTED WITH upsd_enable="YES"
#
# mettre dan
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following:
David Southwell wrote:
Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)?
They may have some bearing on the problem.
20080701:
AFFECTS: users of devel/subversion*
AUTHOR: Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:06:57PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> Seriously, though... is someone actively working on a perl 5.10 port and
> can we find out what is holding it up for over 6 months now? Around
> February I started wondering about it, bu
49 matches
Mail list logo