After OS upgrade to 6.3, libtool15 configure hangs at f771 test

2008-07-14 Thread Peter Olsson
We are upgrading some servers from 6.2 to 6.3, and after reboot with 6.3 we upgrade ports with, among others, this command: portmaster -bdr gettext\* A couple of servers upgraded with no problems, but now I have a server hanging while trying to run configure for libtool. The hang always occurs aft

Re: firefox-3.0_2,1 no reactions

2008-07-14 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:01:57 -0500, Helko Glathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:40:10 +0200, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:49:27 -0500, Helko Glathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I've installed firefox-3.0_2,1 on FreeBSD 7.0 Rele

mail/nmh port ownership

2008-07-14 Thread Scott Blachowicz
Hi- My FreeBSD box is currently at 5.4 and I'm not sure when I'll be able to update it. The nmh package was "recently" updated from 1.2 to 1.3, so the port should probably should also be updated. It'll probably be a while before I'll be able to get to it, so if someone else wants to do it, th

need help with the amanda port

2008-07-14 Thread RMC PHX
I've tried to contact the port maintainer for /usr/ports/misc/amanda client and server, but he has failed to respond. Can someone please upgrade the amanda ports to the current version of amanda? Thanks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://

Re: FreeBSD Port: www/cherokee-devel build and run

2008-07-14 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Monday 14 July 2008, regisr said: > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:06:46 +1000 > > Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > > This implies that /usr/local/bin is not in your $PATH. > > But it is in the path! > I run "echo $PATH" and I > checked .login .profile .cshrc ... > > If it was not in the PATH

Re: MOVED has extra blank line, breaks portupdate-scan

2008-07-14 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Monday 14 July 2008, Doug Barton said: > Alex Stangl wrote: > > /usr/ports/MOVED picked up an extra blank line on the end, > > apparently in v1.1647. This breaks portupdate-scan, and maybe > > other things that process this file. > > > > Is there any definitive document describing this file form

Re: MOVED has extra blank line, breaks portupdate-scan

2008-07-14 Thread Doug Barton
Alex Stangl wrote: /usr/ports/MOVED picked up an extra blank line on the end, apparently in v1.1647. This breaks portupdate-scan, and maybe other things that process this file. Is there any definitive document describing this file format? Not that I'm aware of. If blank lines should be tre

MOVED has extra blank line, breaks portupdate-scan

2008-07-14 Thread Alex Stangl
/usr/ports/MOVED picked up an extra blank line on the end, apparently in v1.1647. This breaks portupdate-scan, and maybe other things that process this file. Is there any definitive document describing this file format? If blank lines should be treated as equivalent to comments, then I will issue

Re: I can't ge jdk16 on AMD64 Current to compile, nor jdk15 that I need to build OpenOffice.

2008-07-14 Thread Robert Noland
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 21:01 -0700, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 02:05:33PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:52 AM, eculp wrote: > > > > >I've not been able to get OpenOffice to compile on my AMD64-2 > > >Current8 because first it will not accept diablo-jdk15

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/07/2008 15:18 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: version 2.8 is alway > than 2.6. So you must use -f option here: portupgrade -fo www/neon26 neon28 portupgrade will no update ports on older version if you did not force it. yes, -f does the job, thanks! But, on t

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:46:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: > > > > This command works: > > # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26 > > > > I'll fix UPDATING entry. > > Is the reverse operation supposed to work? > > $ pkg_glob neon\* > ne

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/07/2008 15:18 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: > > version 2.8 is alway > than 2.6. So you must use -f option here: > > portupgrade -fo www/neon26 neon28 > > portupgrade will no update ports on older version if you did not force it. > yes, -f does the job, thanks! But, on the other

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/07/2008 14:57 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: This command works: # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26 I'll fix UPDATING entry. Is the reverse operation supposed to work? $ pkg_glob n

Re: firefox-3.0_2,1 no reactions

2008-07-14 Thread Helko Glathe
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:40:10 +0200, Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:49:27 -0500, Helko Glathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I've installed firefox-3.0_2,1 on FreeBSD 7.0 Release. Firefox3 starts without warnings. But entering URLs into the adress field th

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/07/2008 14:57 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: >>> This command works: >>> # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26 >>> >>> I'll fix UPDATING entry. >> >> Is the reverse operation supposed to work? >> >> $ pkg_g

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: This command works: # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26 I'll fix UPDATING entry. Is the reverse operation supposed to work? $ pkg_glob neon\* neon28-0.28.2_1 $ portupgrade -o www/neon26 neon28 $ portupgrade -o www/n

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/07/2008 14:32 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: > > This command works: > # portupgrade -o www/neon28 neon26 > > I'll fix UPDATING entry. Is the reverse operation supposed to work? $ pkg_glob neon\* neon28-0.28.2_1 $ portupgrade -o www/neon26 neon28 $ portupgrade -o www/neon26 www/neo

Re: portupgrade fails to upgrade the package because the older version is installed

2008-07-14 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/07/2008 01:01 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: Andriy Gapon wrote: on 10/07/2008 11:18 Yuri said the following: David Southwell wrote: Did you follow the instructions in UPDATING (see below)? They may have some bearing on the problem. 20

Re: FreeBSD Port: www/cherokee-devel build and run

2008-07-14 Thread regisr
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:06:46 +1000 Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > This implies that /usr/local/bin is not in your $PATH. But it is in the path! I run "echo $PATH" and I checked .login .profile .cshrc ... If it was not in the PATH I can't run a lot of commands ;-) I don't understand

Re: FreeBSD Port: www/cherokee-devel build and run

2008-07-14 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2008-Jul-14 12:16:20 +0200, regisr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It return a code status 503 with the message on output: >> env: python: No such file or directory > >If I replace the first line "#!/usr/bin/env python" >by "#!/usr/local/bin/python" it works ... This implies that /usr/local/bin

Re: FreeBSD Port: www/cherokee-devel build and run

2008-07-14 Thread regisr
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:00:10 +0200 regisr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > 3) about cherokee-admin: > It return a code status 503 with the message on output: > env: python: No such file or directory > is there something wrong with my configuration? > My python package installed is python25-2.5.2_

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2008-07-14 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2008-07-14 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the li

Re: Ports procedure when upgrading (e.g 6.1 >6.3)

2008-07-14 Thread David Southwell
On Sunday 13 July 2008 14:40:33 David Southwell wrote: > On Sunday 13 July 2008 11:34:34 RW wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:28:03 -0700 > > > > David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I have just upgraded a system from 6.1 to 6.3 on an amd64 system and > > > ran across som

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2008-07-14 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: squid-2.6.21 Committers on the hook: ale amdmi3 beech edwin lawrance lippe maho miwi pav rafan vanilla wxs Most