Patch failure for Ruby18-gems-1.2.0 on amd64

Following error message: === Patching for ruby18-gems-1.2.0 === ruby18-gems-1.2.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby18 - found === Applying FreeBSD patches for ruby18-gems-1.2.0 = Patch patch-lib-rubygems-source_info_cache.rb failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in

gcc versions following upgrade 6.3 7.0

FreeBSD **.vizion2000.net 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 16 09:27:38 PDT 2008 @**.vizion2000.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # pkg_info |grep gcc gcc-4.1.3_20080630 GNU Compiler Collection 4.1 gcc-4.2.5_20080702 GNU Compiler Collection 4.2 gccmakedep-1.0.2Create

RE: Patch failure for Ruby18-gems-1.2.0 on amd64

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 July 2008 02:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Patch failure for Ruby18-gems-1.2.0 on amd64 Following error message: === Patching

Re: gcc versions following upgrade 6.3 7.0

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:11:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FreeBSD **.vizion2000.net 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 16 09:27:38 PDT 2008 @**.vizion2000.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # pkg_info |grep gcc gcc-4.1.3_20080630 GNU Compiler Collection 4.1

Re: Patch failure for Ruby18-gems-1.2.0 on amd64

The recompile produced the same result for ruby-gems. Is a pr needed here or is someone on to it already? David I'm the maintainer and I'm looking into it. Jonathan -- Jonathan Weiss http://blog.innerewut.de http://twitter.com/jweiss ___

BUG: firefox3 hangs while make

Hi, While building firefox the make process just stops and do not proceede. The last process that does not exit (still running - after more than 30min) is actually shlibsign: (I try to compile version 3.0.1) ---: [...] cd mangle;

Re: portupgrade 2.4.6 -- quoting still broken

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:24:18PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Kostik Belousov пишет: Using the portupgrade 2.4.6 from stable port, I used the WITH_GECKO=firefox in the MAKE_ARGS. And, below is the output of the portupgrade. Note quoting. --- Installing the new version via the port

Re: Patch failure for Ruby18-gems-1.2.0 on amd64

A fix was commited. Jonathan Jonathan Weiss wrote: The recompile produced the same result for ruby-gems. Is a pr needed here or is someone on to it already? David I'm the maintainer and I'm looking into it. Jonathan -- Jonathan Weiss http://blog.innerewut.de http://twitter.com/jweiss

BIG Update for www/webalizer

I updated ports on one of our web servers today and discovered that webalizer is suddenly a lot different. A couple of days ago the port was upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.20.1. - command line switches have changed - configuration file options have changed - defaults have changed Nothing in

Re: BIG Update for www/webalizer

John Marshall wrote: I updated ports on one of our web servers today and discovered that webalizer is suddenly a lot different. A couple of days ago the port was upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.20.1. - command line switches have changed - configuration file options have changed - defaults have

Re: BIG Update for www/webalizer

--On Monday, July 21, 2008 09:55:07 -0600 Eric Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks for the info. The main webalizer page states: July 12, 2008 Version 2.20-01 has been released. This is a drop in replacement for sites running v2.01 with no additional changes required, and all

Re: Patch failure for Ruby18-gems-1.2.0 on amd64

On Monday 21 July 2008 04:27:58 Jonathan Weiss wrote: The recompile produced the same result for ruby-gems. Is a pr needed here or is someone on to it already? David I'm the maintainer and I'm looking into it. Jonathan OK just csup ports-all -- your new patch fixes the problem. Thank

Re: BIG Update for www/webalizer

On Jul 21, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Eric Zimmerman wrote: thanks for the info. The main webalizer page states: July 12, 2008 Version 2.20-01 has been released. This is a drop in replacement for sites running v2.01 with no additional changes required, and all users are encouraged to upgrade

Porttools and running 'port test'

I'm not sure if it's porttools at fault here or my own system (or even where I have my files), but it seems like every other time I run a 'port test' on a port, the permissions on the files being extracted are coming out wrong. For instance, configure scripts are lacking their +x, even though

Re: BIG Update for www/webalizer

Paul Schmehl wrote: --On Monday, July 21, 2008 09:55:07 -0600 Eric Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks for the info. The main webalizer page states: July 12, 2008 Version 2.20-01 has been released. This is a drop in replacement for sites running v2.01 with no additional

Re: firefox3 port missing firefox-config or firefox3-config

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:25:52PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:06:02 -0500, Naram Qashat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was trying to modify the VLC port to enable the Firefox plugin, but when I added firefox3 to the list of USE_GECKO and tried to build the port,

FreeBSD Port: py25-qt-3.17.4_1,2

Hey, I'm running 7.0-RELEASE, i386, and KDE 3.5.8/Qt 3.3.8 from ports. Trying to install /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt gives this error: ... -- Creating pyqtconfig.py... /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++| share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX =

Re: BIG Update for www/webalizer

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, 11:23 -0600, Eric Zimmerman wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: --On Monday, July 21, 2008 09:55:07 -0600 Eric Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: any idea what command line options changed based on your experience? I didnt see mention of command line changes at: i did a