On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:11:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> FreeBSD **.vizion2000.net 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 16
>> 09:27:38 PDT 2008 @**.vizion2000.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, 11:23 -0600, Eric Zimmerman wrote:
> Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >--On Monday, July 21, 2008 09:55:07 -0600 Eric Zimmerman
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>any idea what command line options changed based on your experience? I
> >>didnt
> >>see mention of command line changes
Hey,
I'm running 7.0-RELEASE, i386, and KDE 3.5.8/Qt 3.3.8 from ports.
Trying to install /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/py-qt gives this error:
...
-- Creating pyqtconfig.py...
/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|mkspecs/freebsd-g++|
share/qt/mkspecs/freebsd-g++|' -e 's|CC = cc|CC = cc|' -e 's|CXX = c++|CXX =
c
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:25:52PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:06:02 -0500, Naram Qashat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I was trying to modify the VLC port to enable the Firefox plugin, but
> >when I added firefox3 to the list of USE_GECKO and tried to build the
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Monday, July 21, 2008 09:55:07 -0600 Eric Zimmerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thanks for the info. The main webalizer page states:
July 12, 2008 Version 2.20-01 has been released. This is a
drop in
replacement for sites running v2.01 with no additional chan
I'm not sure if it's porttools at fault here or my own system (or even where I
have my files), but it seems like every other time I run a 'port test' on a
port, the permissions on the files being extracted are coming out wrong. For
instance, configure scripts are lacking their +x, even though t
On Jul 21, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Eric Zimmerman wrote:
thanks for the info. The main webalizer page states:
July 12, 2008 Version 2.20-01 has been released. This is a drop
in replacement for sites running v2.01 with no additional changes
required, and all users are encouraged to upgrade when
On Monday 21 July 2008 04:27:58 Jonathan Weiss wrote:
> > The recompile produced the same result for ruby-gems.
> > Is a pr needed here or is someone on to it already?
> > David
>
> I'm the maintainer and I'm looking into it.
>
> Jonathan
OK just csup ports-all -- your new patch fixes the problem.
--On Monday, July 21, 2008 09:55:07 -0600 Eric Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
thanks for the info. The main webalizer page states:
July 12, 2008 Version 2.20-01 has been released. This is a drop in
replacement for sites running v2.01 with no additional changes required, and
all
John Marshall wrote:
I updated ports on one of our web servers today and discovered that
webalizer is suddenly a lot different.
A couple of days ago the port was upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.20.1.
- command line switches have changed
- configuration file options have changed
- defaults have changed
I updated ports on one of our web servers today and discovered that
webalizer is suddenly a lot different.
A couple of days ago the port was upgraded from 2.1.10 to 2.20.1.
- command line switches have changed
- configuration file options have changed
- defaults have changed
Nothing in /usr/ports
A fix was commited.
Jonathan
Jonathan Weiss wrote:
The recompile produced the same result for ruby-gems.
Is a pr needed here or is someone on to it already?
David
I'm the maintainer and I'm looking into it.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
http://twitter.com/jweiss
_
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:24:18PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> Kostik Belousov пишет:
> >Using the portupgrade 2.4.6 from stable port, I used the
> >WITH_GECKO="firefox"
> >in the MAKE_ARGS. And, below is the output of the portupgrade. Note
> >quoting.
> >
> >---> Installing the new version
Hi,
While building firefox the make process just stops and do not proceede.
The last process that does not exit (still running - after more than
30min) is actually shlibsign:
(I try to compile version 3.0.1)
---:<
[...]
cd mangle; /usr/local/bin/gm
The recompile produced the same result for ruby-gems.
Is a pr needed here or is someone on to it already?
David
I'm the maintainer and I'm looking into it.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
http://twitter.com/jweiss
___
freebsd-po
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:11:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FreeBSD **.vizion2000.net 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 16
> 09:27:38 PDT 2008 @**.vizion2000.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> # pkg_info |grep gcc
> gcc-4.1.3_20080630 GNU Compiler Collection 4.1
> gcc-4
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 July 2008 02:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Subject: Patch failure for Ruby18-gems-1.2.0 on amd64
>
> Following error message:
> ===>
FreeBSD **.vizion2000.net 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 16
09:27:38 PDT 2008 @**.vizion2000.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# pkg_info |grep gcc
gcc-4.1.3_20080630 GNU Compiler Collection 4.1
gcc-4.2.5_20080702 GNU Compiler Collection 4.2
gccmakedep-1.0.2Create depende
Following error message:
===> Patching for ruby18-gems-1.2.0
===> ruby18-gems-1.2.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby18 - found
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ruby18-gems-1.2.0
=> Patch patch-lib-rubygems-source_info_cache.rb failed to apply cleanly.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/
19 matches
Mail list logo
