There is no firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk. This seems to keep
plugins and add-ons that would work in Firefox 3 as well from being
ported.
Regards
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To uns
Hello,
I have noted that the dependency in the subject has been added to the
rrdtool port.
This has the unfortunate effect of sucking in a libX11 dependency(others
too...) which was not before.
Maybe I'm an extremist, but I don't like having X11 pieces on headless
server machines, I really don't
Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Frank Shute wrote
> in <20081206083250.ga54...@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk>:
>
> fr> Hi,
> fr>
> fr> I just had a problem when building print/cm-super.
> fr>
> fr> cm-super.zip doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
> fr> => Attempting to fetch from
> ftp://ftp.f
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 05:36:08PM +0100, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:38:31AM +1100, Some Dude wrote:
> # do a google search for the exact name of the first file, then click on
> # the cached page that'll show the sources and links
>
> Thanks, dude ;-)
>
> That was exa
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
There is no firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk. This seems to keep
plugins and add-ons that would work in Firefox 3 as well from being
ported.
As far as I understand, plugins for any Mozilla products are made using
xulrunner now.
Naram Qashat
Regards
__
Guido Falsi 2008-12-15:
> I have noted that the dependency in the subject has been added
> to the rrdtool port.
>
> This has the unfortunate effect of sucking in a libX11
> dependency(others too...) which was not before.
>
> Maybe I'm an extremist, but I don't like having X11 pieces on
> headles
Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Hiroki Sato wrote:
Frank Shute wrote
in <20081206083250.ga54...@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk>:
fr> Hi,
fr>
fr> I just had a problem when building print/cm-super.
This was because the distfile was updated. The port was also updated
just now, so please try the lates
Anyone out there working on a port of RT 3.8?
The latest version in the tree is rt-3.6.7_1.
There was some promising work a few months ago but everything seems to
have stopped and there is nothing new in the ports tree...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org m
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:11:51AM -0800, Chris Meyer wrote:
> Anyone out there working on a port of RT 3.8?
>
> The latest version in the tree is rt-3.6.7_1.
>
> There was some promising work a few months ago but everything seems to
> have stopped and there is nothing new in the ports tree...
P
On Thu 2008-12-11 05:27:40 UTC-0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > For what it's worth, I did not encounter this.
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:59:08 +1100 andrew clarke wrote:
> Me neither.
> > > /usr/obj/home/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.7-5/tests/.libs/co
> > > nstitute -storagetype
>
Wesley Shields wrote:
I've also added him as CC to this reply so he can speak up if he has any
more information to add.
I've gotten several comments (esp recently). My first thought is to
commit it as is and let the PRs come it. Several people have been using
the prototype in production for a
Wesley Shields wrote:
There was some promising work a few months ago but everything seems to
have stopped and there is nothing new in the ports tree...
Philip (pgollucci@) was working on it. I know he has been very busy
with other commitments lately so he has not been able to polish the
edges.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:46:04PM -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Wesley Shields wrote:
> >> There was some promising work a few months ago but everything seems to
> >> have stopped and there is nothing new in the ports tree...
> >
> > Philip (pgollucci@) was working on it. I know he has been
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Unfortunately, the RT ports in the tree (esp p5-) will need to change to
use this instead since RT36 isn't packagable. Which is why they were
still there, but they seem to have got comitted today by someone else.
I'm the maintainer of the half dozen or so RT extensi
I tried the questions list, but I can't seem to get an answer apart from
a workaround (which I already implemented anyway).
Any ideas on how to fix this?
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:29 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Da Rock writes:
>
> > I'm trying to install php5-extensions (
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works
> > pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable
> > using the
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Naram Qashat wrote:
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
>> There is no firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk. This seems to keep
>> plugins and add-ons that would work in Firefox 3 as well from being
>> ported.
>>
>
> As far as I understand, plugins for any Mozilla products are
I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the
following configure error:
checking jpeglib.h usability... yes
checking jpeglib.h presence... yes
On Monday 15 December 2008 15:25:34 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the
> > following configure error:
> >
> > checking jpeglib.h usability... yes
> > checking jpeglib.h presence... yes
>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Monday 15 December 2008 15:25:34 Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> On Dec 15, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
>> > I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the
>> > following configure error:
>> >
>> > checking jpegli
On Dec 15, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the
following configure error:
checking jpeglib.h usability... yes
checking jpeglib.h presence... yes
checking for jpeglib.h... yes
checking for jpeg_CreateCompress in -ljpeg... n
On Monday 15 December 2008 15:35:22 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Beech Rintoul
wrote:
> > On Monday 15 December 2008 15:25:34 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >> On Dec 15, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> >> > I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm ge
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:56 -0600, Coleman Kane
wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it
works
> pretty well, btw). I was playin
Hi,
The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on
7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly"
and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the
following vars set:
NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_
Am working with Exim, started a few months ago. I have 4.69 port.
This evening I wanted to see if there was a newer version available.
Still at 4.69, but changes say Makefile was updated 3 days ago to 1.240.
I downloaded from webpage and examined files, specifically Makefile.
It is still the ol
On Monday 15 December 2008 21:44:14 Dave Stegner wrote:
> Am working with Exim, started a few months ago. I have 4.69 port.
>
> This evening I wanted to see if there was a newer version available.
>
> Still at 4.69, but changes say Makefile was updated 3 days ago to 1.240.
>
> I downloaded from we
27 matches
Mail list logo
