The PYEASYINSTALL_ARCHDEP=YES port option makes packages [1] that can
only be installed on the same specific patch level of FreeBSD.
For example if you build net/py-ldap2 as a package on FreeBSD
7.1-RELEASE-p3 then it won't install on a FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p4 system.
PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cg
Your email client cannot read this email.
To view it online, please go here:
http://www.pubsecjobs.co.uk/sendstudionx/display.php?M=1935&C=7630a0f09a35a98f0e465717a5a4d1e0&S=4&L=1&N=1
To stop receiving these
emails:http://www.pubsecjobs.co.uk/sendstudionx/unsubscribe.php?M=1935&C=7630a0f09a35a98
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:37:51PM +0100, dan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for the offer. But I don't think I am able to maintain it :
>> deluge talks "python" and I dont know it. Maybe I should start from any
>> "C port". Is there a list of orphan ports ?
>
> Yes, there
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: p5-Authen-DecHpwd-2.004: no entry for
/usr/ports/devel/p5-Data-Integer
make_index: p5-Authen-DecHpwd-2.004: no entry for
/usr/ports/
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:37:51PM +0100, dan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the offer. But I don't think I am able to maintain it :
> deluge talks "python" and I dont know it. Maybe I should start from any
> "C port". Is there a list of orphan ports ?
Yes, there was a rather long thread on thi
Hi,
Thank you for the offer. But I don't think I am able to maintain it :
deluge talks "python" and I dont know it. Maybe I should start from any
"C port". Is there a list of orphan ports ?
dan
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:11:02PM +0100, dan wrote:
Hi,
Today I trie
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:54:14 -0700
"Cory R. King" wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Anybody working on upgrading devel/subversion to 1.6.0? If not, I might
> take a stab at it. Since it touches so many things, like say the entire
> repository, I'd be nervous doing it--I'd probably break things (neon?
> liba
David Schultz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I am trying to compile gimp on -current right now and x11/babl and
>> graphics/gegl both have this problem. Take a look at
>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-failure.html for more
>> examples (click on the link on the
Hi Douglas,
I wanted to introduce you to Hire a Hero. Hire a Hero is a non profit
agency that was created as a way to bring military job seekers and
military friendly employers together. We think this is the best way to
say thank you to these brave men and women who have served our country.
Hi
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 19:30 +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote:
>
> > > > This would break very fast -- it's passing -j3 to port Makefile instead
> > > > of vendor Makefile.
> > >
> > > This has worked fine for me for countless years, except where the
> > >
* dan (mesli...@yahoo.fr) wrote:
> Today I tried to compile "deluge" . I had a stop in the make process .
> The error I discovered is the same as :
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=353897 . I applied the same
> suggested temporary fix .
That must have been my boost 1.37 compatibi
Dmitry Marakasov píše v st 25. 03. 2009 v 19:36 +0300:
> * Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote:
>
> Great, that was just about time.
>
> My question is whenther that would be enabled on pointyhat. I fear
> that error logs may become far less readable with output from
> multiple commands mixed
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote:
Great, that was just about time.
My question is whenther that would be enabled on pointyhat. I fear
that error logs may become far less readable with output from
multiple commands mixed together.
We may also consider using -P option for BSD make for that
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> > > This would break very fast -- it's passing -j3 to port Makefile instead
> > > of vendor Makefile.
> >
> > This has worked fine for me for countless years, except where the
> > vendor's Makefiles were not parallel-safe. This has been my trick to get
Howdy,
Anybody working on upgrading devel/subversion to 1.6.0? If not, I might
take a stab at it. Since it touches so many things, like say the entire
repository, I'd be nervous doing it--I'd probably break things (neon?
libapr? All the bindings?)
Thoughts?
--
Cory R. King
Mozi Media Group, L
Tilman Linneweh wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 2009, at 20:43, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I'm testing my ports for MAKE_JOBS_SAFE-ness, and came across this
>> message when building xscreensaver (which uses gmake):
>>
>> gmake[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to
>> parent make rule.
>>
>>
Is the Mailscanner port still being maintained? The last version in
ports is 4.67.6_3 while version 4.74 has been available from the
Mailscanner site since the beginning of January. I tried contacting the
maintainer, "j.koopm...@seceidos.de" without success.
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
guru, n: A
On Mar 24, 2009, at 20:43, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm testing my ports for MAKE_JOBS_SAFE-ness, and came across this
message when building xscreensaver (which uses gmake):
gmake[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to
parent make rule.
I have zero gmake fu, can anyone help me ma
Anonymous píše v st 25. 03. 2009 v 12:51 +0300:
> FYI, that example went to ports/133054.
Cool. Just a side note -- boost is having a major overhaul, so you might
want to coordinate with the folks who currently do the work, too.
--
Pav Lucistnik
Like 'Do Notte Buye Betamacks.'
Pav Lucistnik writes:
> Anonymous pí¹e v st 25. 03. 2009 v 09:26 +0300:
>> Pav Lucistnik writes:
>>
>> > If you are FreeBSD port maintainer:
>>
>> I'm not one.
>>
>> >
>> > Nothing changes for you, if you don't want. If you want to enable the
>> > use of multiple cores in your port, add MAKE_
Dear sir,
On the 10th of March 2009 FFmpeg 0.5 was released. Can you tell me if
this version will be ported to FreeBSD, and if so, do you have an idea
about a release date of this port?
Thanks in advance.
With kind regards,
Laurens Kistenkas
___
per...@pluto.rain.com píše v st 25. 03. 2009 v 00:23 -0700:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Brian Whalen p??e v ?t 24. 03. 2009 v 12:08 -0700:
> > > On a related topic, I wonder what the cost would be of acquiring
> > > enough hardware so that the probability of actually getting a
> > > package with po
Anonymous píše v st 25. 03. 2009 v 09:26 +0300:
> Pav Lucistnik writes:
>
> > If you are FreeBSD port maintainer:
>
> I'm not one.
>
> >
> > Nothing changes for you, if you don't want. If you want to enable the
> > use of multiple cores in your port, add MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes to a block
> > somewh
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Brian Whalen p??e v ?t 24. 03. 2009 v 12:08 -0700:
> > On a related topic, I wonder what the cost would be of acquiring
> > enough hardware so that the probability of actually getting a
> > package with portupgrade -aP would go up substantially ...
>
> It's more a question o
25 matches
Mail list logo
