adding users in ports

2009-04-03 Thread subbsd
Hello maillist, I've planned porting some software to FreeBSD and currently generate Makefile for ports. My application required presence of some account in system. I've see many sample from current ports like squid, cacti, avahi, mysql, pgsql, cups, distcc... and many-many-many, they are

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-04-03 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Pav Lucistnik wrote: Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200: Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of INDEX file. I don't see how this is connected to my question. I want people

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-04-03 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Dominic Fandrey píše v pá 03. 04. 2009 v 11:46 +0200: Pav Lucistnik wrote: Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200: Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of INDEX file. I

Re: adding users in ports

2009-04-03 Thread RW
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:12:18 +0400 subbsd sub...@gmail.com wrote: My question - why do not make this facility by generic (for example create add/del/check-existence procedure in some /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.users.mk file) ? Presumably because the same functionality has to go into package files, and

Ports freeze to start April 13

2009-04-03 Thread Erwin Lansing
The ports freeze for the upcoming release of 7.2 will start in one week time on April 13. Release packages will be built immediately and have to be ready for RC2 which is scheduled for March 20. To keep the freeze as short as possible, the date might be moved depending on any delays in the src

Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade

2009-04-03 Thread Alexander Churanov
2009/4/3 Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru: Not sure if splitting it into many small libraries is a good idea. How many are there, btw? Is it a port per libboost_*so, or per include/boost/* ? Neither. Per the list of libraries: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_38_0 There are 95 libraries in

Re: adding users in ports

2009-04-03 Thread Julien Laffaye
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:40 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:12:18 +0400 subbsd sub...@gmail.com wrote: My question - why do not make this facility by generic (for example create add/del/check-existence procedure in some /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.users.mk file) ?

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

2009-04-03 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Pav Lucistnik wrote: Dominic Fandrey píše v pá 03. 04. 2009 v 11:46 +0200: Pav Lucistnik wrote: Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200: Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of

USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk vs OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7

2009-04-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk. bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this to dependency on libscim-1.0.so.8.1.0. But I have: $ pkg_which /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/libscim-1.0.so.8.1.1 linux-scim-libs-fc7-1.4.5_2 And yes, I have OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7. So acroread8 can't detect

Re: USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk vs OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7

2009-04-03 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk. bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this to dependency on libscim-1.0.so.8.1.0. But I have: $ pkg_which /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib/libscim-1.0.so.8.1.1 linux-scim-libs-fc7-1.4.5_2 And yes, I

Re: USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk vs OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7

2009-04-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk. bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this to dependency on libscim-1.0.so.8.1.0. But I have: $ pkg_which

failed with pkg_add

2009-04-03 Thread Sylvio César Teixeira Amorim
Hi I want to know if there is not more the tarball gnome2, gnome2-lite, KDE4, etc via pkg_add -r for version current i386 Whenever I try, return package not found. Just getting through ports, but rather takes to compile. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Live free or die - UNIX* -=-=-=-=-=-=-= --

Re: USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk vs OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7

2009-04-03 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk. bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this to dependency on

Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade

2009-04-03 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchura...@gmail.com) wrote: There are 95 libraries in boost. Woo, that's sure too many. Let me explain that: Boost has source-only libraries and separately-compiled libraries. Source-only libraries consist of header files only and do not require any

Re: pulseaudio - main.c: Daemon startup failed

2009-04-03 Thread Parv
in message 20090403154943.ga51...@holstein.holy.cow, wrote p...@pair.com thusly... I am finally annoyed enough the message produced by pulseaudio ... ^ ^ by Apr 3 05:15:12 holstein pulseaudio[91444]:

Re: USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk vs OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7

2009-04-03 Thread Richard Kuhns
Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: For instance: acroread8 has USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk. bsd.linux-apps.mk translates this to dependency on

pulseaudio - main.c: Daemon startup failed

2009-04-03 Thread parv
I am finally annoyed enough the message produced by pulseaudio ... Apr 3 05:15:12 holstein pulseaudio[91444]: main.c: Daemon startup failed. ... whenever flash plugin (graphics/swfdec, www/swfdec-plugin) is invoked in Firefox. I tried building the port with default options selected, and no

Re: USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk vs OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7

2009-04-03 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:10:13 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote: Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: For instance: acroread8 has

Re: USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk vs OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7

2009-04-03 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:48:04 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:10:13 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote: Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:07:11 +0300

Re: USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk vs OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7

2009-04-03 Thread Richard Kuhns
Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:48:04 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:10:13 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote: Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: on 03/04/2009 17:19 Boris Samorodov said the following: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009

Re: USE_LINUX_APPS=scimgtk vs OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f7

2009-04-03 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:09:26 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote: Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:48:04 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:10:13 -0400 Richard Kuhns wrote: Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:26:22 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: on 03/04/2009

postfix-policyd-spf

2009-04-03 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
I have been having a terrible time trying to compile postfix-policyd- spf. Before I go into details, I'd like to ask whether there is an alternative way to get a postfix SPF milter running. If I can skip this package, I think I'll be much happier. postfix-policyd-spf specifically depends