Ignore my last message, just like I ignored the space between lang and /.
Sorry to bother the list.
Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already
obvious, my opinions are my own
and not those of my employer.
**
WARNING: Check the headers before replying
_
I'm preparing to upgrade two servers. I decided to upgrade perl to 5.10.0
before doing anything else (I've done this before on other systems), but I
ran into a problem.
Per /usr/ports/UPDATING
# portupgrade -o lang /perl5.10 -f perl-5.8.\*** There are errors in a
meta info for perl-5.8.9
**
Just as a note, if you upgrade multimedia/audacious and you run
into the following error:
$ audacious2
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libaudclient.so.1" not found,
required by "audacious2"
Deinstall and recompile audacious and it should work (at least it
did for me).
HTH,
-Garrett
_
On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:22:03 -0400
Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Marcin Rzepecki writes:
>
> > But why won't port do this automatically? Is there a way to force
> > it before installing updated port version?
>
> Revuilding a dependency (here, dovecot) does not always
> require rebuilding the
Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:22:03PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Revuilding a dependency (here, dovecot) does not always require
> rebuilding the dependant port. Sometimes, but not always.
Hello Robert,
first, thanks for the answer.
So, is there any dirty trick to make it happen? ;) For example
Marcin Rzepecki writes:
> But why won't port do this automatically? Is there a way to force
> it before installing updated port version?
Revuilding a dependency (here, dovecot) does not always require
rebuilding the dependant port. Sometimes, but not always.
Also: are you awar
Hello,
I have some questions about port dependencies. Let's take
for example following situation:
I have dovecot and dovecot-managesieve installed.
Today a new version of Dovecot showed up, so i'm upgrading it:
# make -C /usr/port/mail/dovecot
It builds ok, so i'm reinstalling port:
# make -C /usr
Hi I tested it yesterday,
1.
I need
> MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes
in the Makefile.
2. with above patch, ooo2 doesn't launch parallele jobs.
3. ooo3, 3-rc, 3-devel are okay with patch 1.
thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.org/
Nakata Maho's PGP public keys:
From: Bernhard Fröhlich
Subject: Re: Adding Guestadditions.iso Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for
FreeBSD! take 3
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 19:11:16 +0200 (CEST)
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 2:32 pm, Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> Hi miwi,
>>
>> Here is a patch adding "WITH_GUESTADDITIONS" knob.
>> With this k
According to http://forum.coppermine-gallery.net/index.php/topic,59551.0.html,
there's a SQL injection vulnerability in coppermine 1.4.22 and earlier.
Looks like the port hasn't caught up yet, and this probably deserves
a portaudit entry, too.
Regards,
--
Steve Watt KD6GGD PP-ASEL-IA I
On Sat, May 23, 2009 2:32 pm, Maho NAKATA wrote:
> Hi miwi,
>
> Here is a patch adding "WITH_GUESTADDITIONS" knob.
> With this knob we also installs
> Guest additions.iso. This driver makes Windows XP, Linux and Solaris
> faster.
> I'm a newbie to VirtualBox so it is not the correct patch.
> I don'
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:31:29AM +0200, cpghost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to use GnuPG with Webmail (e.g. with gmail or other
> webmails). AFAICS, the following Firefox add-on would help:
>
> http://www.getfiregpg.org/
>
> Unfortunately, according to http://www.getfiregpg.org/install.html
>
Hi miwi,
Here is a patch adding "WITH_GUESTADDITIONS" knob.
With this knob we also installs
Guest additions.iso. This driver makes Windows XP, Linux and Solaris faster.
I'm a newbie to VirtualBox so it is not the correct patch.
I don't check it thoroughly but ISO image itself is not a GPL one.
Be
On Saturday 23 May 2009 12:51:33 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 2009 18:24:26 +0900 (JST)
> Maho NAKATA wrote:
> > > Please see attached for the patch. The changes to bsd.port.mk:
> > > - MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER always defined
> > > - MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER forced to 1 if UNSAFE of DISABLE
>
> AFAIR
On Sat, 23 May 2009 18:24:26 +0900 (JST)
Maho NAKATA wrote:
> Hi David
>
> Many many thanks for your patch. I'll test it very soon.
>
> Just one comment
> > I believe openoffice-2* can me marked as SAFE while openoffice-3*
> > should not be marked at all (since it sometimes works..., very well
Hi David
Many many thanks for your patch. I'll test it very soon.
Just one comment
> I believe openoffice-2* can me marked as SAFE while openoffice-3* should not
> be marked at all (since it sometimes works..., very well for me :-).
you can mark as SAFE for all of our ports. If it's broken,
its O
On Friday 22 May 2009 15:41:38 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009 19:53:50 +0900 (JST)
>
> Maho NAKATA wrote:
> > In massive parallel build, OOo can be broken. We explicitly
> > fix them otherwise broken. I just test with MAXJOB = 4 or something
> > like that.
> >
> > > I had it compla
17 matches
Mail list logo
