Maybe it is the problem of sun-wtk

I install sun-wtk with ports. After that I run the ktoolbar command. But I couldn't make new project with the ktoolbar,before I use command "chmod +w /usr/local/sun-wtk/apps" I think it is all end of the fault.But when I run the Demo of wtk.I get a message from ktoolbar like below: "Couldn't loa

Re: [patch] net/vnc: add support for ia64

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:06:40 -0700 Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > See diff here: > http://ns1.xcllnt.net/~marcel/vnc.diff > > This adds support for ia64 (with the caveat that VNC needs to > be compiled at -O0). > > Any objections if I commit this? > > Related: tightvnc compiles but segfaults

Re: vim ports broken.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:59 PM, matt donovan wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I think the vim ports is broken. >> >> When I try to compile I've got : >> >> [root@ vim]# make >> ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >> => 7.2.041

Re: vim ports broken.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all > > I think the vim ports is broken. > > When I try to compile I've got : > > [root@ vim]# make > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > => 7.2.041% doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/vim. > => Attempting to

Re: [patch] x11-servers/xorg-server: allow building on ia64

On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 14:12 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > See diff here: > http://ns1.xcllnt.net/~marcel/xorg-server.diff > > This allows building of xorg-server on ia64. It's not intended > to make it usable at this time. For one, there's no console on > ia64 that xorg supports :-) > >

[patch] x11-servers/xorg-server: allow building on ia64

See diff here: http://ns1.xcllnt.net/~marcel/xorg-server.diff This allows building of xorg-server on ia64. It's not intended to make it usable at this time. For one, there's no console on ia64 that xorg supports :-) Any objections if I commit this? -- Marcel Moolenaar xcl...@mac.com

[patch] net/vnc: add support for ia64

See diff here: http://ns1.xcllnt.net/~marcel/vnc.diff This adds support for ia64 (with the caveat that VNC needs to be compiled at -O0). Any objections if I commit this? Related: tightvnc compiles but segfaults at runtime due to some initialization issue. I may look into that as well...

net/forg: Doesn't work

Hi, I installed net/forg, but the port doesn't work. It seems to start successfully, but throws a TclError. Hitting the "go" button results in another exception that appears to be Tcl related, too. Trying to restart it results in another exception, and it returns 1. The exceptions follow. Regards

problem compiling audio/ardour

I have tried several times now to get ardour installed on a few different systems. The first was a station that already had hydrogen and a GUI installed- all audio was working OK (Jack, videos, etc.). The second was a fresh install with just Xorg, Blackbox, and qjackctl installed. The last w

cmexfonts-0.2

Hello, In attachment there is the version 0.2 of cmexfonts. This version covers the same charset (big5p). but re-encodes the font from big5p to unicode. Regards, Wei-Lun Chao ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 19, 2009 03:07:53 am Johan van Selst wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > > Should this new category come to being, the self identified ports in > > > misc would get relocated. All other ports would simply be extended with > > > the new virtual cate

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 19, 2009 02:50:12 am Doug Barton wrote: > Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > > I would like to propose a new ports category, i18n, it would become the > > new home, physical or virtual, for ports that are i18n or l10n based. > > > > While researching the

vim ports broken.

Hi all I think the vim ports is broken. When I try to compile I've got : [root@ vim]# make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found => 7.2.041% doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/vim. => Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/. fetch: http://ft

Re: FreeBSD Port: mod_auth_xradius-0.4.6

Cantu, Mike wrote: > Hello, > > I had an issue building the port with apr_memcache under the amd64 > 7.2-RELEASE. No matter what I tried, the configure phase would not > "find" libapr_memcache. One of the tests would say "yes" but it would > end up saying that the lib was not found. It didn't m

Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n

Doug Barton wrote: > > Should this new category come to being, the self identified ports in misc > > would get relocated. All other ports would simply be extended with the new > > virtual category name. > You've probably already covered this, but are you making a distinction > between ports that ar