On Tuesday 11 August 2009 19:13:44 Gabriele Cecchetti wrote:
> Probably there is an error in the Makefile of omnetpp:
>
> When I do portupgrade at the install phase the following output is shown:
>
> ---> Installing the new version via the port
> ===> Installing for omnetpp-3.3_3
> ===> omnetpp
Probably there is an error in the Makefile of omnetpp:
When I do portupgrade at the install phase the following output is shown:
---> Installing the new version via the port
===> Installing for omnetpp-3.3_3
===> omnetpp-3.3_3 depends on executable: convert - found
===> omnetpp-3.3_3 depen
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
>
>> I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
>
> So, what do we do? May I commit the patch (+portmgr)? I believe this to
> be the best solution (even if a tempora
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
> I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
So, what do we do? May I commit the patch (+portmgr)? I believe this to
be the best solution (even if a temporary one if we'll be able to
resolve things with SF) as it will be c
Greetings
A simple question from a simple mind. Or, at least a forgetful one.
I am slowly moving the computers in my SOHO to FreeBSD 8 from 7-stable.
In order to be more efficient, I am using a faster server as a source
and ports server.
The source portion is working as designed with the slower
bastion# uname -a
FreeBSD bastion.mordvap.net 7.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p3 #1: Tue
Aug 11 19:19:21 CEST 2009
u...@bastion.host.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BASTION i386
checking whether ln -s works... (cached)
Hello Mr. Sato,
Any update about these ?
Didn't you find my symptom on your box ?
Rgds,
--
Lasta Yani
- "Lasta Yani" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any update about this ?
>
>
> - "Lasta Yani" wrote:
>
> > - "Hiroki Sato" wrote:
> > >
> > > I think there is no problem with the configu
* Alexander Kriventsov (a...@vl.ru) wrote:
> I would like to write port for ReposStyle. This is open source
> stylesheet for the Subversion index web page.
> Please give me advise how I can get distfiles of this project.
> These files are available by this link
> http://groups.google.com/group/r
Can you please
email me lines 9750-9759
from your file:
/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/configure
I want to see what error is being reported.
The reported error does not seem to reflect the content of my libtdl/configure
at that line number
> ./configure: 9753: Syntax error: word unexpected (
In message <21544.1250015...@critter.freebsd.dk>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>
>I just installed my new laptop with -current doing a complete build,
>in the end, firefox3 does not start:
>
>/usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin
>/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libxul.so" not found, required by
>
Hello,
I've made some minor modifications to the emacs-devel port to update
it to emacs version 23.1. Should I submit a PR or maybe you are
waiting for some reason?
Cheers,
Joey Mingrone
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
I just installed my new laptop with -current doing a complete build,
in the end, firefox3 does not start:
/usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libxul.so" not found, required by
"firefox-bin"
it is not entirely clear to me how it managed to compile against thi
cc'ing the maintainer since this is an issue that needs to be addressed.
Doug
Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
> graphics/netpbm & netpbm-devel:
>
> These two ports dont list and CONFLICTS for either one of them. They do on
> the other hand list a conflict with "mgetty ???". Why don't these list
>
graphics/netpbm & netpbm-devel:
These two ports dont list and CONFLICTS for either one of them. They do on the
other hand list a conflict with "mgetty ???". Why don't these list conflicts
with each other?. As of now I am doing cleanup once again for two versions of
netpbm that have somehow been
Hello.
Sorry for my English.
I would like to write port for ReposStyle. This is open source
stylesheet for the Subversion index web page.
Please give me advise how I can get distfiles of this project.
These files are available by this link
http://groups.google.com/group/reposstyle/files, but th
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:04:44AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Erwin Lansing wrote:
> > Below is the tentative schedule for the ports freeze in preparation for
> > 8.0-RELEASE. If any major delays occur in the overall release schedule,
> > the dates may be postponed, but please start preparing to
Erwin Lansing wrote:
> Below is the tentative schedule for the ports freeze in preparation for
> 8.0-RELEASE. If any major delays occur in the overall release schedule,
> the dates may be postponed, but please start preparing to have your
> changed committed to the tree before August 17 to ensure
* Erwin Lansing [2009-08-11]:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:41:03PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> > * Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
> >
> > Here's the patch I propose.
> >
> > Unfortunately, there's no way to guess MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR (examples:
> >
> > http://sunet.dl.sourceforge
* Erwin Lansing (er...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> Writing SF might actually our best option here.
I've written them through feedback form. Not sure it'll reach them, so
I'll also submit a proper support request when I get home (~in 6hrs). I
don't have my SF password with me currently :(
--
Dmitry Ma
* Erwin Lansing (er...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> > I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
> > and I guess that will affect many ports and maybe infrastructure.
>
> I fear the same, unfortunately. However, I haven't as yet been able to
> identify a consistency in the
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:41:03PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
>
> Here's the patch I propose.
>
> Unfortunately, there's no way to guess MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR (examples:
>
> http://sunet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/maxima/Maxima-source/5.19.0-source
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
[...]
> As you can see, the distfile now redirects to another path and also
> another mirror. As fetch doesn't follow redirects by default, this won't
> work.
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
Here's the patch I propose.
Unfortunately, there's no way to guess MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR (examples:
http://sunet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/maxima/Maxima-source/5.19.0-source/maxima-5.19.0.tar.gz
http://sunet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/lam/LAM/2.7.0/ldap
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:20:54PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>> Hi!
>
> hi Dmitry,
>>
>> I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
>> and I guess that will affect many ports and maybe infrastructure.
>
> I
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 07:20:54PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
hi Dmitry,
>
> I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
> and I guess that will affect many ports and maybe infrastructure.
I fear the same, unfortunately. However, I haven't as yet been able
Hi!
I've noticed that SF is changing file distribution scheme significantly,
and I guess that will affect many ports and maybe infrastructure.
Hopefully, the change only seem to affect new distfiles, so for now we
should just do extra checks for updates of ports hosted on sourceforge.
Here's what
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:00:56PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:52:31 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> >
> >> The portmgr team has enhanced the pointyhead scripts to publish MOVED
> >> and UPDATING files together with the INDEX files that kports
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:40:16 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Sourceforge seems to have gone re-direct happy. Downloading anything
> from there seems to require following at least two 302 redirects --
> eg:
> Notice how it's forced me to go to the Kent mirror? (Not that I'm
> complaining -- UKC
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:52:31 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
>> The portmgr team has enhanced the pointyhead scripts to publish MOVED
>> and UPDATING files together with the INDEX files that kports and
>> pkg_upgrade use for binary package updating.
>>
>> http://www.freebs
Troy wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
Troy wrote:
Updated all ports to python 26 and the problem still exists:
pkg_info|grep py
boost-python-libs-1.39.0 Framework for interfacing Python and C++
p5-Clone-0.31 Clone - recursively copy Perl datatypes
py26-dbus-0.83.0_1 Python bindings for
David Southwell wrote:
Troy wrote:
Updated all ports to python 26 and the problem still exists:
pkg_info|grep py
boost-python-libs-1.39.0 Framework for interfacing Python and C++
p5-Clone-0.31 Clone - recursively copy Perl datatypes
py26-dbus-0.83.0_1 Python bindings for the D-BUS m
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:52:31 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> The portmgr team has enhanced the pointyhead scripts to publish MOVED
> and UPDATING files together with the INDEX files that kports and
> pkg_upgrade use for binary package updating.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13502
The portmgr team has enhanced the pointyhead scripts to
publish MOVED and UPDATING files together with the INDEX
files that kports and pkg_upgrade use for binary package
updating.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135024
Many thanks to the portmgr team!
I hope I will find the time to up
> Troy wrote:
> > Updated all ports to python 26 and the problem still exists:
> >
> > pkg_info|grep py
> > boost-python-libs-1.39.0 Framework for interfacing Python and C++
> > p5-Clone-0.31 Clone - recursively copy Perl datatypes
> > py26-dbus-0.83.0_1 Python bindings for the D-BUS messagi
34 matches
Mail list logo
