* Albert Shih (albert.s...@obspm.fr) wrote:
Thanks for Dmitry for this ports. I'm going to keep this thing somewhere
No need to, if it works fine and there are no objections for it,
I'll commit it to the tree.
--
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
* Mark Linimon (lini...@lonesome.com) wrote:
As a reminder, the last time this software was in the ports tree, the
developer threatened us with a lawsuit. This repeats what he has
previously done to several other BSDs and several Linux distributions.
This is why ports for his software are no
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 03:14:17PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Mark Linimon (lini...@lonesome.com) wrote:
As a reminder, the last time this software was in the ports tree, the
developer threatened us with a lawsuit. This repeats what he has
previously done to several other BSDs and
Hi!
The ion3 window manager was previously removed from the ports tree
becase of license issues. However, the clauses that causes this
were removed (see [1]), so I think we should add it back. I've
prepared updated version of the port ([2]), but I wanted to check
with you, since azhe was who
* Erwin Lansing (er...@freebsd.org) wrote:
The license forbids this software to be in the tree, so with my portmgr
hat on I ask you not to add this to the tree again.
It no longer does:
http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/ion-general/2009-September/002520.html
Now it's LGPLv2.1 with the only
Hi
gnupg-2.0.13 depends on devel and installs it. This causes problems on a
7.2-p3 amd64 system. A number of ports fail to build due to conflicts
between pth and the standard system thread library.
For example x11-toolkits/py-qt4-gui build fails with pth-2.0.7 installed.
After deletion
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:25:49 +0400
Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru wrote:
Hi!
The ion3 window manager was previously removed from the ports tree
becase of license issues. However, the clauses that causes this
were removed (see [1]), so I think we should add it back. I've
prepared updated
Hi
If , when building libsvg2 on freebsd 7.2-p3 amd64, there is a compile
failure if the mozilla support option is selected. Without it the port
builds fine.
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thursday 01 October 2009 23:30:57 da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Hi
gnupg-2.0.13 depends on devel and installs it. This causes problems on a
7.2-p3 amd64 system. A number of ports fail to build due to conflicts
between pth and the standard system thread library.
For example
-Original Message-
From: Dima Panov [mailto:flu...@fluffy.khv.ru]
Sent: 01 October 2009 06:09
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc: da...@vizion2000.net; r...@gnu.org; kuriy...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: security/gnupg installing pth-2.0.7 causing problems
On Thursday 01 October
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
On 01.10.2009 04:32 Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
I am the maintainer of syck-library these days.
I noticed, that freebsd-port doesn't have maintainer, but this address
is mentioned instead.
I just released new version of library which
Ports at FreeBSD.org:
I should have sent this also to you - it seems like it bounced from
ntar...@cs.uoi.gr
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide...
John Stubblebine
js...@jstub.com
Original Message
Subject:portupgrade failure xcb-util failure
Date:
Thanks, Dmitry, but I'd rather not maintain any other ports at this
time. I think resurrecting ionwm is a great idea, btw.
# Adam
2009/10/1 Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru:
Hi!
The ion3 window manager was previously removed from the ports tree
becase of license issues. However, the
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:27:50PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:46:06 +0200
Alexey Shuvaev shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
Hello all!
After about one month of playing with ports-mgmt/tinderbox (thanks to
all for the tool!) I realized I've applied the
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 03:45:46PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Now it's LGPLv2.1 with the only restriction that this software may not
be significantly changed while being distributed as ion3.
I hate to replay this whole issue from the beginning, but apparently there
is no other way.
The
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 02:58:23PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
No need to, if it works fine and there are no objections for it,
I'll commit it to the tree.
I insist that you not to commit it to the tree. See my other post.
mcl
___
Please see my other post about this port. Thanks.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
17 matches
Mail list logo