Re: security/gorilla

2009-10-16 Thread Artyom Bisyarin
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:11:27 +0300, Bisyarin Artyom wrote: Or should I write a PR? -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-

Re: Firefox FORBIDDEN for a while now....

2009-10-16 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Lowell Gilbert writes: > Chris Rees writes: > >> Since firefox 2.* has so many vulnerabilities, isn't it about time to >> upgrade completely to firefox 3? The software's been out for over a >> year now (AFAICR), so why are we so reluctant to change it? > > Gecko support. We have most of the inf

Re: Re: Firefox FORBIDDEN for a while now....

2009-10-16 Thread utisoft
On 16 Oct 2009 18:48, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com> writes: > Since firefox 2.* has so many vulnerabilities, isn't it about time to > upgrade completely to firefox 3? The software's been out for over a > year now (AFAICR), so why are we so reluctant to chan

Re: Miro 2.5.2 has a forbidden dependence

2009-10-16 Thread Rainer Hurling
On 16.10.2009 19:40 (UTC+2), Lowell Gilbert wrote: utis...@googlemail.com writes: On 16 Oct 2009 12:03, Michele Monti wrote: Hello, Miro 2.5.2 has as a dependence firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=%5Efirefox-2.0.0.20_9,1&stype=name>,which is forbidden. ===

Re: proftpd problems (ldap, quota, tds) and a patch

2009-10-16 Thread Wesley Shields
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:21:56PM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote: > 2009-10-15 04:30 keltez?ssel, Wesley Shields ?rta: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 09:42:49AM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I ran into a couple of problems with the proftpd port after the latest > >> update. > >>

Re: Firefox FORBIDDEN for a while now....

2009-10-16 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Chris Rees writes: > Since firefox 2.* has so many vulnerabilities, isn't it about time to > upgrade completely to firefox 3? The software's been out for over a > year now (AFAICR), so why are we so reluctant to change it? Gecko support. We have most of the infrastructure to switch to something

Re: Miro 2.5.2 has a forbidden dependence

2009-10-16 Thread Lowell Gilbert
utis...@googlemail.com writes: > On 16 Oct 2009 12:03, Michele Monti wrote: >> Hello, > > > >> Miro 2.5.2 has as a dependence > >> firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=%5Efirefox-2.0.0.20_9,1&stype=name>,which > >> is forbidden. > > > >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports

Firefox FORBIDDEN for a while now....

2009-10-16 Thread Chris Rees
Dear all, Since firefox 2.* has so many vulnerabilities, isn't it about time to upgrade completely to firefox 3? The software's been out for over a year now (AFAICR), so why are we so reluctant to change it? I may be mistaken, but http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=123876 appears to be mo

Re: Miro 2.5.2 has a forbidden dependence

2009-10-16 Thread utisoft
On 16 Oct 2009 12:03, Michele Monti wrote: Hello, Miro 2.5.2 has as a dependence firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=%5Efirefox-2.0.0.20_9,1&stype=name>,which is forbidden. ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/www/firefox ===>>> This port is marked FORB

dvdauthor compile problems.

2009-10-16 Thread Jimmie James
Anyone able to point me in the right direction, I've reinstalled all of multimedia/dvdauthor depends, and I'm still hitting this build error, gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/dvdauthor/work/dvdauthor-0.6.14/src' if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DSYSCONFDIR="\"/usr/local/et

Re: proftpd problems (ldap, quota, tds) and a patch

2009-10-16 Thread Peter Czanik
2009-10-15 04:30 keltezéssel, Wesley Shields írta: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 09:42:49AM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I ran into a couple of problems with the proftpd port after the latest >> update. >> >> Until now I compiled LDAP without the additional quota support. Now, >> eve

Miro 2.5.2 has a forbidden dependence

2009-10-16 Thread Michele Monti
Hello, Miro 2.5.2 has as a dependence firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1,which is forbidden. ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/www/firefox ===>>> This port is marked FORBIDDEN ===>>> too many security issues http://www.vuxml

Re: Enforcing library version in a port Makefile?

2009-10-16 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 09:49:28AM -0500, Alex Stangl wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:15:58AM +, b. f. wrote: > > Alex Stangl wrote: > > >I am trying to create a new port. The software I am trying to port uses > > >scons which calls out to pkg-config to check for certain minimal library > >

problem with building /usr/ports/java/jdk16 in 'nohup' mode

2009-10-16 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, If you build the port /usr/ports/java/jdk16 in 'nohup' mode it loops later in the question about the license: ===> Extracting for jdk-1.6.0.3p4_12 => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-src-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar. => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-src-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar. => MD5 Che