On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:44:04PM +0100, Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
> Is there a reason why BUILD_DEPENDS aren't being removed after a port
> has been installed and if no other installed port depends on it?
How do you know that the user does not want that port installed?
And what if the user will i
Is there a reason why BUILD_DEPENDS aren't being removed after a port
has been installed and if no other installed port depends on it?
Sandra
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscrib
Hi m...@freebsd.org
cc: po...@freebsd.org
A hint would be welcome please with sysutils/libcdio, Paranoia stuff seems
broken, but I'm not clear what's intended, hence mail rather than a send-pr.
uname -a
FreeBSD laps.js.berklix.net 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #2: \
Wed Sep 9 1
On 2009-Nov-14 15:46:27 +, Thomas Sandford
wrote:
>Wesley Shields wrote:
>> Sure, but it doesn't belong in bsd.*.mk. Turn it into a script and
>> submit it as a regular port.
>
>If it were just one port and/or just a port maintainers tool I'd agree.
>But this is something that affects MULTIP
amd64, FreeBSD
7.2/i386 and with a QATty tinderbox so i'm quite sure it will not look
too bad. Runtime testing is about zero so we need feedback before we
get it into the tree.
Download:
- http://home.bluelife.at/ports/mythtv-0.22-20091115.tar.gz
Highlights:
- enabled ivtv with patch from usl
On Sun, November 15, 2009 6:27 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Bernhard Froehlich
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Looks like MAN1 in the Makefile should be updated too. If it installs
>> and
>> deinstalls fine please submit it as PR.
>>
>
> If anyone would test what I have
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>
> Looks like MAN1 in the Makefile should be updated too. If it installs and
> deinstalls fine please submit it as PR.
>
If anyone would test what I have so far (attached), it would help.
It is tested with porttools ("port test" to
On 15.11.2009 15:26 (UTC+1), B. Estrade wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:10:39AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 15.11.2009 09:35 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:41:58 +0100 Rainer Hurling
wrote:
I am working on a new port math/saga. It is my first port.
Now that I
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:10:39AM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 15.11.2009 09:35 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:41:58 +0100 Rainer Hurling
> >wrote:
> >>I am working on a new port math/saga. It is my first port.
> >>
> >>Now that I am able to directly download th
On Sun, November 15, 2009 12:24 am, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a reason why p5-xmltv haven't been updated? In ports we have
> version 0.5.52, but on the main web site version 0.5.56 have been
> available a while now.
>
> Simply chnaging the version in the Makefile, removing the
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:55:21 +0300 Eygene Ryabinkin
wrote:
>Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:19AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> Why are you putting saga into math? It should be in databases, like
>> grass and postgis are,
>
>Let's see. /usr/ports/databases/postgis/pkg-descr:
>-
>
>PostGIS ad
On 15.11.2009 09:35 (UTC+1), Scott Bennett wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:41:58 +0100 Rainer Hurling
wrote:
I am working on a new port math/saga. It is my first port.
Now that I am able to directly download the sources of SAGA GIS from
sourceforge (thanks to Eygene Ryabinkin and Sergey V.
Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 02:35:19AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
> Why are you putting saga into math? It should be in databases, like
> grass and postgis are,
Let's see. /usr/ports/databases/postgis/pkg-descr:
-
PostGIS adds support for geographic objects to the PostgreSQL
object-relational dat
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:41:58 +0100 Rainer Hurling
wrote:
>I am working on a new port math/saga. It is my first port.
>
>Now that I am able to directly download the sources of SAGA GIS from
>sourceforge (thanks to Eygene Ryabinkin and Sergey V. Dyatko), there is
>another problem with porting
14 matches
Mail list logo
