On 12/4/09, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi Radeon HD 2xxx, 3xxx and 4xxx users!
>
> I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base, graphics/dri,
> graphics/libGL*, graphics/libglut, graphics/mesa-demos and
> graphics/libdrm. Please see also my attached patch file.
Sandra Kachelmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Version 1.18 of perdition is available.
>
> Could you please update the port?
You might want to take a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html
and have a go yourself. :)
Good luck,
Doug
--
Improve the ef
Dirk Meyer wrote:
eculp schrieb:,
would seem that I'm going to have to upgrade all my 7.2-STABLE servers
to either 8.0 or 9.0 that all have usb printers that are being shared
by others through cups.
Please update the ports and try again.
I would like to know if using libusb solves
Hi Radeon HD 2xxx, 3xxx and 4xxx users!
I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base, graphics/dri,
graphics/libGL*, graphics/libglut, graphics/mesa-demos and
graphics/libdrm. Please see also my attached patch file. I'll
update these as soon as tomorrow.
On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Kyle McKinley wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was just wondering when the 3.8.6 would be available? Thanks!
>
> I am currently running 3.8.6 through tinderbox so the answer is in the very
> near
> future..
>
>
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:49:10 -0600
eculp wrote:
> At the end of this email I'm referencing a previous email that I sent
> about this before checking if the problem was the new BSD stack and it
> appears that it is. I just checked with my FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT laptop
> and it finds the USB pr
Hello,
I don't know if this issue concern port maintainer or php ffmpeg extension team
directly, but after "make extract" in FreeBSD ports there's an error in
config.m4, this line use PHP == operator that is of course not available in a
.m4 file :
if test "$enable_ffmpeg_swscale" == yes; the
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Robert Noland wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:18 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
>> > the new beta state nvidia
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:20:10AM -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
> I've never actually used the blob, but is the new driver only amd64? I
> presume that it does need at least 8.0-RELEASE to work, but I can't
> imagine that the underlying code would be different for i386/amd64.
Driver we talk about
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Robert Noland wrote:
*snip*
I've never actually used the blob, but is the new driver only amd64?
I presume that it does need at least 8.0-RELEASE to work, but I can't
imagine that the underlying code would be different for i386/amd64.
i.e. the new driver *should* be better
At the end of this email I'm referencing a previous email that I sent
about this before checking if the problem was the new BSD stack and it
appears that it is. I just checked with my FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT laptop
and it finds the USB printer perfectly and prints as expected. It
would seem th
Setting up a Asterisk box on Freebsd 7.2 i386
Need to install the wct4xxp driver for our TE212P card.
Extracted the sources from the ports tarball to do a manual config of the
make file.
When doing a make it stops in the wct4xxp directory with this :
awk -f @/tools/makeobjops.awk
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:18 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
> > the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
>
> Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm consideri
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:25:22PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 04.12.2009 16:18 (UTC+1), Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Right now I believe our bpm is capable of the task, and
> > my pmake/bpm-fu is strong enough, we'll see.
>
> I tried it with patching your Makefile and distinfo. In Makefile I
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:32:11PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
> > > the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
> >
> > Yup, thanks for the point
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
> > the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
>
> Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm considering options right now.
>
> >
> > Since it's a completely d
On 04.12.2009 16:18 (UTC+1), Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
Hi
I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm considering options right now.
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:47:24PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
> the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
Yup, thanks for the pointer. I'm considering options right now.
>
> Since it's a completely different version it
Hi
I was wondering if you're working on a port for the 64bit version of
the new beta state nvidia driver [1].
Since it's a completely different version it should IMO be seperate from
x11/nvidia-driver. Maybe x11/nvidia-driver-amd64 and x11/nvidia-driver
could be renamed to x11/nvidia-driver-i386.
,--- You/Arjan (Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:19:58 +0100) *
| Unfortunately, our bug system is not open for reading by the public, but I
| can tell you that this bug report has been received and is being looked at
| by our build system maintainers
`---
Op Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:49:23 +0100 schreef Doug Barton :
Claude Buisson wrote:
2) Today, I installed Opera 10.10 on a FreeBSD 7.2 system, and now the
IPv6
connectivity is lost !!
On the same system:
Opera show me the "Network problem" screen, saying that
http://ipv6.google.com/
in unavailab
Op Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:09:58 +0100 schreef Claude Buisson
:
Hello,
1) On November 2, I submitted a bug report (DSK-269766) to Opera
concerning
Opera 10.01 for FreeBSD 6.4, namely that the binary was linked with
libstdc++.so.6
libgcc_s.so.1
which do not exist in FreeBSD 6.4,
and also wit
on 04/12/2009 10:58 Dirk Meyer said the following:
> Andriy Gapon schrieb:,
>
>> What is the purpose of installing libobjc.so from gnustep-objc in the case
>> when
>> GNUSTEP_WITH_BASE_GCC is defined?
>> Is /usr/lib/libobjc.so somehow not suitable?
>> Esp. given that all stable and "old-stable" v
Here is a straightforward change to resolve name conflict between fexecve(2) and
same named function in smake sources:
.if ${OSVERSION} >= 800032
post-patch:
@${FIND} ${WRKSRC} -name "*.[ch]" | ${XARGS} ${REINPLACE_CMD} \
-e 's/fexecve/fexecve_bsd/'
.endif
OSVERSION con
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:53:52 +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> Err... Delete that. setenv PACKAGESITE /usr/ports/packages is the
> correct one. IMHO PACKAGESITE should be set to that by default.
I also see that I need to run 'portmaster --check-depends' manually after
doing a 'portmaster -a -P
25 matches
Mail list logo
