Re: Porting Songbird - what does it depend on?

2009-12-08 Thread Jason Evans
Eitan Adler wrote: While attempting to port Songbird to firefox I get /usr/local/lib/linux-songbird/songbird-bin /usr/local/lib/linux-songbird/songbird-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libjemalloc.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory What dependency am I miss

Re: amd64 9-current packages

2009-12-08 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:58:30PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > In developing the package code for portmaster I used the 8-current > packages with good result (and in fact coded that into the script for > now). However as time goes on and more things change between 8-stable > and 9-current that work

Re: amd64 9-current packages

2009-12-08 Thread Doug Barton
AN wrote: > Is there an estimate for when packages will be available for amd64 > 9-current? In developing the package code for portmaster I used the 8-current packages with good result (and in fact coded that into the script for now). However as time goes on and more things change between 8-stable

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Mark Linimon wrote: [...] Two data points: one, it looks like Pav having marked www/p5-Gtk2-WebKit as broken had already been taken into account for the amd64 build, so it didn't have that problem. And two, some of our i386 machines are indeed underpowered. We've added several new, more moder

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Mark Linimon píše v út 08. 12. 2009 v 14:17 -0600: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:15:13AM -0300, oren.al...@gmail.com wrote: > > and some poinyhat build runs are never uploaded. > > Hmm, they should be. I'll forward this on to pav. (The way we have the > work divided up is that pav does amd64; er

Re: amd64 9-current packages

2009-12-08 Thread Pav Lucistnik
AN píše v út 08. 12. 2009 v 19:20 +: > Is there an estimate for when packages will be available for amd64 > 9-current? Hi, currently no estimate. Really, running on CURRENT you should be building your own packages from source. With the limited horsepower available on amd64 side of pointyha

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:15:13AM -0300, oren.al...@gmail.com wrote: >> For the last couple of days I have been following the pointyhat build >> statistics provided at >> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/packagestats.html > > Brave man :-) That's one I set up. > >>

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread oren . almog
On 12/8/2009 5:17 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: But now you know the contents of (part of) my todo list. mcl Good luck and thank you very much for a thorough and informative reply. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:15:13AM -0300, oren.al...@gmail.com wrote: > For the last couple of days I have been following the pointyhat build > statistics provided at > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/packagestats.html Brave man :-) That's one I set up. > As seen on that page, the build

amd64 9-current packages

2009-12-08 Thread AN
Is there an estimate for when packages will be available for amd64 9-current? TIA ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Porting Songbird - what does it depend on?

2009-12-08 Thread Eitan Adler
While attempting to port Songbird to firefox I get /usr/local/lib/linux-songbird/songbird-bin /usr/local/lib/linux-songbird/songbird-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libjemalloc.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory What dependency am I missing?

Pointyhat packages

2009-12-08 Thread oren . almog
Hello, I understand that there are many who are not really interested in binary packages and are much more happy compiling everything from source but for me this is not a viable option, especially with large ports such as kde, gnome, openoffice etc... For the last couple of days I have been

Re: sysutils/syslinux update

2009-12-08 Thread Luigi Rizzo
committed, thanks In general it would be good if, in the PR, people give more detail on the changes. E.g. in this case you wrote 'A new version is available' but you did a lot more work than changing two lines in the Makefile. Something like This updates the code to version 3.83 and splits th

FreeBSD Port: apache-2.2.13

2009-12-08 Thread Albert Gabàs | Astabis
Dear Apache maintainer, When you plan to upgrade the port to the 2.2.14 release?? Thank you, Regards -- Albert Gabàs - Astabis Information Risk Management ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-port