On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
According to PR 141131 I see exactly the same error messages when I try
to upgrade from libxul-1.9.0.15 to libxul-1.9.0.16:
---
[..snip..]
cc -o FreeBSD9.0_OPT.OBJ/FreeBSD_SINGLE_SHLIB/dsa.o -c
David Southwell wrote:
Hi just curious about:
- print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
- textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE)
Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a.
$ cd /usr/ports/print/cups-pdf
$ make
=== cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken:
On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
According to PR 141131 I see exactly the same error messages when I try
to upgrade from libxul-1.9.0.15 to libxul-1.9.0.16:
---
[..snip..]
cc
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:26:38AM -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 04:58 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:34:22 +0900
Norikatsu Shigemura n...@ninth-nine.com wrote:
I'm ready to update ports related Mesa3D to 7.6 base,
graphics/dri,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 22.12.2009 10:38 (UTC+1), Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:47:33PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
According to PR 141131 I see exactly the same error messages when I try
to upgrade from libxul-1.9.0.15 to
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
Hi just curious about:
- print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
- textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE)
Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a.
$ cd
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 11:23 +, David Southwell wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
Hi just curious about:
- print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
- textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE)
Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade -a.
$ cd
Selon David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net le Mar 22 déc 12:23:58 2009 :
[Cc: trimmed]
I am wondering what changes have taken place to change this from a
functioning
port to one that justifies it being labelled as broken. It must have compiled
OK for me as I already have cups-pdf-2.5.0
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
Hi just curious about:
- print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
- textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE)
Anyone know what is happening with these? Get IGNORE with portupgrade
-a.
Thierry added his wisdom on 22nd Dec:
Selon David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net le Mar 22 déc 12:23:58 2009 :
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
Hi just curious about:
- print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE)
-
David Southwell wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
Strange, but you can try to figure out what happening at pointyhat:
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/si...@olofsson.de-date.html
Maybe it was failing for pointhat - but certainly did not fail
David Southwell wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:23:58AM +, David Southwell wrote:
Strange, but you can try to figure out what happening at pointyhat:
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/si...@olofsson.de-date.html
Maybe it was failing for pointhat - but certainly did not
Hi,
I've just discovered that the port mail/x-face-e21 depends upon
both gtk12 and gtk20:
-
% make -C /usr/ports/mail/x-face-e21 all-depends-list | grep 'gtk[12]'
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk12
-
Gtk12 is an inherited dependency of mail/faces.
Is this OK? Or
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:02:02 +0300
Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru said:
bsam I've just discovered that the port mail/x-face-e21 depends upon
bsam both gtk12 and gtk20:
bsam -
bsam % make -C /usr/ports/mail/x-face-e21 all-depends-list | grep 'gtk[12]'
bsam /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20
Hi rnoland.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600
Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote:
As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were added
just after 2.4.12 and the bits that broke nouveau were just
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 02:03 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
Hi rnoland.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600
Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote:
As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were
Hello,
unfortunately, I don't use FreeBSD anymore and I can no longer
maintain the port security/amavis-stats.
So I want to drop the maintainership, thanks.
---
Mantas
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
David Southwell wrote:
=== cups-pdf-2.5.0 is marked as broken: does not install.
I have removed the Broke line from Makefile. It compiles without compalining
Why do you think the fact that it compiles is relevant? :)
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence
Looks like all the PR's were not in place before the test was run on
pointyhat.
pointyhat doesn't have anything to do with PRs. It runs based on what
is checked into CVS when its runs start. How would it be able to do
otherwise? The ports PR count is currently 998. How is a computer
I am looking at updating a port that now lives on launchpad.net, but
I don't see anything for launchpad.net in bsd.sites.mk
Does anyone know anything about how launchpad.net and its mirrors (if
any) support downloads? Or can suggest a way to support that site
in bsd.sites.mk.
Here are some
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote:
As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
order to keep nouveau working... The bits needed for r600 were added
just
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 07:31 +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org
wrote:
As much as I don't want to, I need to request a repo copy of libdrm in
order to keep
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:38:50PM -0600, Robert Noland wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 07:31 +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:03:15AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:26:38 -0600 Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org
wrote:
As much as I don't
23 matches
Mail list logo
