Re: bsd.perl.mk (Was: Re: _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE lang/perl5.12 Mk/bsd.perl.mk)

2010-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: On 07/20/10 04:52, Doug Barton wrote: So yeah, a pointyhat run is almost certainly a good idea before actually making the change, however 'make index' was the canary in Mark's original coal mine, and fortunately that bird is still singing. :) Exc

Re: bsd.perl.mk (Was: Re: _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE lang/perl5.12 Mk/bsd.perl.mk)

2010-07-19 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/10 04:52, Doug Barton wrote: > So yeah, a pointyhat run is almost certainly a good idea before actually > making the change, however 'make index' was the canary in Mark's > original coal mine, and fortunately that bird is still singing. :) Exc

Re: bsd.perl.mk (Was: Re: _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE lang/perl5.12 Mk/bsd.perl.mk)

2010-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: You didn't quite test everything. I didn't try. :) In talking to Mark his previous testing clearly demonstrated that with the knob set would cause the INDEX generation to fail spectacularly. So the fact that this did not happen, seems like a g

Re: bsd.perl.mk (Was: Re: _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE lang/perl5.12 Mk/bsd.perl.mk)

2010-07-19 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/20/10 03:57, Doug Barton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > >> I've long been interested in this. I must be using the wrong options or >> something. About 1 yr ago I was able to build the index after removing >> the appr

Re: bsd.perl.mk (Was: Re: _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE lang/perl5.12 Mk/bsd.perl.mk)

2010-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: I've long been interested in this. I must be using the wrong options or something. About 1 yr ago I was able to build the index after removing the appropriate things in Mk/. Well, seems like I have good news. :) I ran tests on both 9-current an

HEADS UP: Workspace Switcher broken in 8.1

2010-07-19 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
Many people are reporting the Workspace Switcher widget is broken when using FreeBSD 8.1. That is, they only see one workspace, and others cannot be added. The problem appears to only occur when GNOME is installed from the 8.1 package set, and when GDM is used to login to GNOME. The metacity pac

Re: USE_PERL5_BUILD on perl-less system/jail Q

2010-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Roger Marquis wrote: Is there an option somewhere to deinstall Perl after installing a port that specifies "USE_PERL5_BUILD=yes"? This is a PITA on jails and other systems with minimal software and strict disk limits. Applications using USE_PERL5_BUILD add non-trivial time

USE_PERL5_BUILD on perl-less system/jail Q

2010-07-19 Thread Roger Marquis
Is there an option somewhere to deinstall Perl after installing a port that specifies "USE_PERL5_BUILD=yes"? This is a PITA on jails and other systems with minimal software and strict disk limits. Applications using USE_PERL5_BUILD add non-trivial time and overhead to installations and upgrades,

Re: FreeBSD Port: sympa-5.4.7_1

2010-07-19 Thread Chris Rees
I'll have a look on Thursday for you. Chris Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do threading. On 19 Jul 2010 17:29, "Olivier Girard" wrote: Le 19/07/2010 17:47, Oliver Schonrock a écrit : > > Hi Olivier > > It seems there is a new stable version of

Re: OPTIONS and dynamic PKGNAMPREFIX, e.g. {APACHE, PYTHON, ETC}_PKGNAMEPREFIX (Was: ports/148637 ...)

2010-07-19 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/19/10 20:05, Anonymous wrote: > Christopher Key writes: > >> A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below. >> There appear to be three different solutions used in other ports: >> explicitly setting OPTIONSFILE, explicitly

Re: bsd.perl.mk (Was: Re: _PERL_REFACTORING_COMPLETE lang/perl5.12 Mk/bsd.perl.mk)

2010-07-19 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've long been interested in this. I must be using the wrong options or something. About 1 yr ago I was able to build the index after removing the appropriate things in Mk/. On 07/19/10 02:12, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/18/10 15:38, Mark Linimon w

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Matthias Andree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 19.07.2010 23:30, schrieb Doug Barton: > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> What about removing the -A option from FETCH_ARGS to allow fetch to >> follow 302 code. > > I've always wondered why we have that in the default

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Anonymous
Baptiste Daroussin writes: > 2010/7/19 Doug Barton : >> >> We have already had the discussion about this issue and we're not going to >> be creating ports that download random files from VCS repos. So yes, the >> person/team who is responsible for the port will have to provide a tarball >> of a k

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 02:30:06PM -0700 I heard the voice of Doug Barton, and lo! it spake thus: > > I've always wondered why we have that in the defaults, perhaps > someone who knows can answer? If it served a valid purpose in the > past, but does not any longer, perhaps it's time to remove it?

FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.8

2010-07-19 Thread paul_hohberg
Is anyone else reporting an issue building Samba 3.4.8 with winbind on FreeBSD 8.0? This is the output of the error I am getting when compiling. The output of uname for this systems follows. Thanks in advance for your help. Compiling winbindd/idmap_ad.c winbindd/idmap_ad.c: In function 'idmap_a

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2010/7/19 Doug Barton : > > We have already had the discussion about this issue and we're not going to > be creating ports that download random files from VCS repos. So yes, the > person/team who is responsible for the port will have to provide a tarball > of a known-good version. But that's comple

Re: Allow folloing 302 codes in FETCH_ARGS in bsd.port.mk

2010-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, What about removing the -A option from FETCH_ARGS to allow fetch to follow 302 code. I've always wondered why we have that in the defaults, perhaps someone who knows can answer? If it served a valid purpose in the past, but does not any lon

Re: Tracking port updates

2010-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: 20.07.2010 00:12, Doug Barton пишет: It would be theoretically possible to add support for something more robust than that, but I don't anticipate having time for it any time soon, I currently have a bunch of stuff that I'm trying to wrap up, incl

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-19 Thread Anonymous
Doug Barton writes: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, RW wrote: > >> Am I the only one that thinks it's odd that in 2010 we're still using >> executable scripts to distribute text files? > > How would you do it differently? $ diff -upNr /nonexistent mynewport And if you have CVS checkout around $ cd

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, RW wrote: Am I the only one that thinks it's odd that in 2010 we're still using executable scripts to distribute text files? How would you do it differently? Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!htt

Re: Tracking port updates

2010-07-19 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
20.07.2010 00:12, Doug Barton пишет: It would be theoretically possible to add support for something more robust than that, but I don't anticipate having time for it any time soon, I currently have a bunch of stuff that I'm trying to wrap up, including some portmaster tweaks in other areas. I b

Re: Tracking port updates

2010-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/19/10 02:09, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to keep track of which ports were updated, when they were > updated and versions affected. > > I can't see anything in the ports tree, but before i rolled my own > thought i'd check to see how other people did this? Portmaster output

OPTIONS and dynamic PKGNAMPREFIX, e.g. {APACHE, PYTHON, ETC}_PKGNAMEPREFIX (Was: ports/148637 ...)

2010-07-19 Thread Anonymous
Christopher Key writes: > A crude survey shows several ports with this problem, listed below. > There appear to be three different solutions used in other ports: > explicitly setting OPTIONSFILE, explicitly setting UNIQUENAME, and > explicitly setting LATEST_LINK. If you can suggest which is th

Re: Using ">" sign in LIB_DEPENDS

2010-07-19 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
19.07.2010 20:55, Greg Larkin пишет: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: Hi. Using ">" sign in LIB_DEPENDS in port's Makefile triggers this error: Syntax error: redirection unexpected *** Error code 2 While defined in BUILD_DEPENDS and RUN_DEPENDS works fi

Re: Using ">" sign in LIB_DEPENDS

2010-07-19 Thread Sunpoet Hsieh
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Hi. > > Using ">" sign in LIB_DEPENDS in port's Makefile triggers this error: > Syntax error: redirection unexpected > *** Error code 2 > > While defined in BUILD_DEPENDS and RUN_DEPENDS works fine. > Is this expected behaviour? > > Te

Re: Using ">" sign in LIB_DEPENDS

2010-07-19 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Hi. > > Using ">" sign in LIB_DEPENDS in port's Makefile triggers this error: > Syntax error: redirection unexpected > *** Error code 2 > > While defined in BUILD_DEPENDS and RUN_DEPENDS works fine. > Is this expected beh

Re: FreeBSD Port: sympa-5.4.7_1

2010-07-19 Thread Olivier Girard
Le 19/07/2010 17:47, Oliver Schonrock a écrit : Hi Olivier It seems there is a new stable version of sympa 6.0.05 which has been out for a while and v6.1 is already in beta2. This is just a polite prompt to enquire if you will be updating the FreeBSD port. I tried myself for an hour but ran out

Re: sysytils/bacula-server link failures WITH_POSTGRESQL

2010-07-19 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Il 07/19/10 12:33, Matthew Seaman ha scritto: Dear port maintainer, Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select WITH_POSTGRESQL in the config dialogue for sysutils/bacula-server, it fails to link: This happened to me too... Workaround is to deinstall bacula-server, then

Using ">" sign in LIB_DEPENDS

2010-07-19 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Hi. Using ">" sign in LIB_DEPENDS in port's Makefile triggers this error: Syntax error: redirection unexpected *** Error code 2 While defined in BUILD_DEPENDS and RUN_DEPENDS works fine. Is this expected behaviour? Test sample: LIB_DEPENDS=rubygem-dnsruby>=1.47:${PORTSDIR}/dns/rubygem-dnsr

FreeBSD Port: sympa-5.4.7_1

2010-07-19 Thread Oliver Schonrock
Hi Olivier It seems there is a new stable version of sympa 6.0.05 which has been out for a while and v6.1 is already in beta2. This is just a polite prompt to enquire if you will be updating the FreeBSD port. I tried myself for an hour but ran out of skills (none of the old patches apply and i

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-19 Thread Anonymous
RW writes: > I don't think that's right. When I used shar to submit an update to an > unmaintained port, I was asked to use diff for updates and shar for > new ports. I was referring more to [new port] PRs. Besides, diffs are natural to any VCS unlike shars. > Incidently shar(1) suggests run

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-19 Thread RW
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:07:14 +0400 Anonymous wrote: > RW writes: > > > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:17:38 -0700 > > Doug Barton wrote: > >> In any case, thanks for expressing your confusion, it's actually > >> really helpful to get information from the perspective of a new > >> user. > > > > I wonde

Re: MAKE_JOBS and openjdk6

2010-07-19 Thread Anonymous
David Naylor writes: >> %% >> Index: java/openjdk6/Makefile >> @@ -266,3 +267,6 @@ post-install: >> @${CAT} ${PKGMESSAGE} >> >> .include >> + >> +# XXX: use `?=' in bsd.port.mk >> +_MAKE_JOBS= >> %% > > Yes, I prefer this approach. See attached for the patch that does this. I > will fil

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-19 Thread Anonymous
RW writes: > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:17:38 -0700 > Doug Barton wrote: >> In any case, thanks for expressing your confusion, it's actually >> really helpful to get information from the perspective of a new user. > > I wonder how many new users have read the bugs section of the shar man > page, and

Re: MAKE_JOBS and openjdk6

2010-07-19 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday 26 June 2010 00:15:16 Anonymous wrote: > David Naylor writes: > > On Friday 25 June 2010 18:08:22 David Naylor wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> java/openjdk6 breaks with FORCE_MAKE_JOBS (it implements its own think). > >> The attached patch fixes openjdk6, marks it as MAKE_JOBS_SAFE and make

Re: [new port] usage of shar command

2010-07-19 Thread RW
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:17:38 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > In any case, thanks for expressing your confusion, it's actually > really helpful to get information from the perspective of a new user. I wonder how many new users have read the bugs section of the shar man page, and know how to check suc

Re: Fwd: Wordpress outputs an empty page after ports upgrade

2010-07-19 Thread Helmut Schneider
Yuri wrote: > After one of the recent upgrades I only get an empty page from > wordpress. While _a_bit_more_ information would be helpdul check the order of the php modules in your extensions.ini -- No Swen today, my love has gone away My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn _

Re: sysytils/bacula-server link failures WITH_POSTGRESQL

2010-07-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 7/19/2010 6:33 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: Dear port maintainer, Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select WITH_POSTGRESQL in the config dialogue for sysutils/bacula-server, it fails to link: That's not very nice, considering PostgreSQL is my preferred database. Lin

Re: sysytils/bacula-server link failures WITH_POSTGRESQL

2010-07-19 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Dear port maintainer, > > Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select > WITH_POSTGRESQL in the config dialogue for sysutils/bacula-server, it > fails to link: > > Linking bacula-dir ... > /usr/ports/sysutil

Updating 'eiciel' port

2010-07-19 Thread Jerry
If possible, could someone please commit this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/148364 -- Jerry ✌ freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. ___

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2010-07-19 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

sysytils/bacula-server link failures WITH_POSTGRESQL

2010-07-19 Thread Matthew Seaman
Dear port maintainer, Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select WITH_POSTGRESQL in the config dialogue for sysutils/bacula-server, it fails to link: Linking bacula-dir ... /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula-server/work/bacula-5.0.2/libtool --silent --tag=CXX --mode=link /usr/bin/

graphics/gdal version 1.7.2

2010-07-19 Thread Rainer Hurling
gdal version 1.7.2 was released on April, 23th. There are many improvements against version 1.6.0 (from December 2008) which we found in the ports. Are there any plans to update graphics/gdal in the next time? If I could help (like testing) in some way please let me know. Thanks in advance fo

Fwd: Wordpress outputs an empty page after ports upgrade

2010-07-19 Thread Yuri
My e-mail to the maintainer of www/wordpress bounced. Please make sure there is the valid maintainer e-email specified for wordpress. Yuri Original Message Subject:Wordpress outputs an empty page after ports upgrade Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:06:09 -0700 From: Yur

Re: Tracking port updates

2010-07-19 Thread Paul Macdonald
On 19/07/2010 10:13, Sergey Nikolenko wrote: On 19.07.2010 15:09, Paul Macdonald wrote: I'd like to keep track of which ports were updated, when they were updated and versions affected. I can't see anything in the ports tree, but before i rolled my own thought i'd check to see how other peopl

Re: Tracking port updates

2010-07-19 Thread Sergey Nikolenko
On 19.07.2010 15:09, Paul Macdonald wrote: I'd like to keep track of which ports were updated, when they were updated and versions affected. I can't see anything in the ports tree, but before i rolled my own thought i'd check to see how other people did this? Subscribe to RSS feed on http://w

Tracking port updates

2010-07-19 Thread Paul Macdonald
Hi, I'd like to keep track of which ports were updated, when they were updated and versions affected. I can't see anything in the ports tree, but before i rolled my own thought i'd check to see how other people did this? thanks Paul. -- - Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd

Re: lang/perl5.12 segfault (amd64 - 8-STABLE)

2010-07-19 Thread Janne Snabb
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Christopher Key wrote: Simple solution, there was a missing -lpthread, patch available from: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/148648 Hehe... I completely overlooked this possibility. I sent a follow-up to perl5-porters quoting your message. For some reas