Re: libvpx-0.9.1 doesn't seem to want to compile on current.

2010-08-05 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:03:34 +0400 Anonymous wrote: A>"Edwin L. Culp W." writes: A> A>> # uname -a A>> FreeBSD ec.encontacto.net 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #50: Sun A>> Jul 25 12:41:11 CDT 2010 A>> A>> /usr/ports/multimedia/libvpx # make clean A>> ===> Cleaning for libvpx-0.9.1 A>> ec.encon

FreeBSD Port: mysql-gui-tools-5.0r14_3

2010-08-05 Thread Tadeusz Raczkowski
mysql-gui-tools seems to have a dependency on mysql version 5.0. Just wondering if it is possible to build mysql-gui-tools for mysql version 5.1! Tadeusz Raczkowski raczkow...@shaw.ca ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/

Could anyone give ports/147828 some love?

2010-08-05 Thread Tobias Rehbein
Hi all. Could a committer with some spare time take a look at ports/147828? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/147828 It started as a small patch to add a slave port but now it contains a minor (0.6.1) and a major update (0.7.1) as the upstream maintainers are quite active. I woul

Re: libvpx-0.9.1 doesn't seem to want to compile on current.

2010-08-05 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Anonymous writes: > "Edwin L. Culp W." writes: >> # uname -a >> FreeBSD ec.encontacto.net 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #50: Sun Jul 25 >> 12:41:11 CDT 2010 >> >> /usr/ports/multimedia/libvpx # make clean >> ===> Cleaning for libvpx-0.9.1 >> ec.encontacto.net >> /usr/ports/multimedia/libvpx #

Re: libvpx-0.9.1 doesn't seem to want to compile on current.

2010-08-05 Thread Anonymous
"Edwin L. Culp W." writes: > # uname -a > FreeBSD ec.encontacto.net 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #50: Sun Jul 25 > 12:41:11 CDT 2010 > > /usr/ports/multimedia/libvpx # make clean > ===> Cleaning for libvpx-0.9.1 > ec.encontacto.net > /usr/ports/multimedia/libvpx # make > ===> Vulnerability che

Re: libvpx-0.9.1 doesn't seem to want to compile on current.

2010-08-05 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Edwin L Culp W writes: > # uname -a > FreeBSD ec.encontacto.net 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #50: Sun Jul 25 > 12:41:11 CDT 2010 > /usr/ports/multimedia/libvpx # make clean > ===> Cleaning for libvpx-0.9.1 > ec.encontacto.net > /usr/ports/multimedia/libvpx # make > ===> Vulnerability check disa

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-05 Thread Jimmie James
On 08/05/10 03:27, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 05.08.2010 05:53, Jimmie James wrote: On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the linux version is a sign

libvpx-0.9.1 doesn't seem to want to compile on current.

2010-08-05 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
# uname -a FreeBSD ec.encontacto.net 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #50: Sun Jul 25 12:41:11 CDT 2010 /usr/ports/multimedia/libvpx # make clean ===> Cleaning for libvpx-0.9.1 ec.encontacto.net /usr/ports/multimedia/libvpx # make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License a

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-05 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 08/05/10 02:27, jhell wrote: > > Just for the sheer sake of saying it since its the least I can do for > this, I would like to say thanks to the gecko team for all the nice work. > > Having email with a nice project integrated like lightning means a world > of difference for a lot of people if

Re: Whither Thunderbird 3.1(.1)?

2010-08-05 Thread Beat Gaetzi
On 05.08.2010 05:53, Jimmie James wrote: > On 03.08.2010 18:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> On 8/3/10 3:05 AM, Beat Gaetzi wrote: >>> On 03.08.2010 02:59, Doug Barton wrote: > Just curious about the status of native Thunderbird 3.1.x. IMO the > linux > version is a significant improveme