FreeBSD Port: openx-2.8.2

2010-09-20 Thread Alexandre LISSY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I think the FreeBSD port is currently having securities issues. We are using OpenX from the ports, and since September, 18th, it's been everyday that some script-kiddie-like injects stuff in our database which needs to be cleaned following http

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2010-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked forbidden

2010-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2010-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2010-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

2010-09-20 Thread jhell
On 09/20/2010 22:07, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Janne Snabb wrote: > >> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: >>> One issue with either Git or Mercurial is that they are GPL. >>> AFAIK FreeBSD prefers to avoid GPL in the base or in critical >>> widely-used infrastructure if a viab

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

2010-09-20 Thread perryh
Janne Snabb wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > One issue with either Git or Mercurial is that they are GPL. > > AFAIK FreeBSD prefers to avoid GPL in the base or in critical > > widely-used infrastructure if a viable non-GPL alternative > > exists. > > The project curr

Re: x11/kdelibs4 build fails, can't find docbook

2010-09-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:49:21PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:20:09PM -0400, Janos Dohanics wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:07:16 +0200 > > olli hauer wrote: > > > > > On 2010-09-20 07:37, Janos Dohanics wrote: > > > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:31:18 -0400 > > > > J

Re: x11/kdelibs4 build fails, can't find docbook

2010-09-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 06:20:09PM -0400, Janos Dohanics wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:07:16 +0200 > olli hauer wrote: > > > On 2010-09-20 07:37, Janos Dohanics wrote: > > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:31:18 -0400 > > > Janos Dohanics wrote: > > > > > >> While building kde4-4.5.1, I get this error

Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323

2010-09-20 Thread Steve Ames
My bad. I generally dont criticize people while asking for their help. Also you emailed me directly so freebsd mailing list rules are irrelevant. So. Yey you get to be right. Hope it solves your issues. On Sep 20, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi, Steve-- > > On Sep 20, 2010, at

Re: update bacula-server 5.0.2 -> 5.0.3, Undefined symbol "ASN1_INTEGER_it

2010-09-20 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 07:39:58PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: > On 2010-09-19 08:20, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #0: Tue Sep 7 22:46:59 CEST 2010 > > p...@candyman.i.inter-sonic.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > Portupgrade of bacula-server 5.0.2 -> 5.0.3 > > > >

autoconf problem ?

2010-09-20 Thread Rich Dunkle
Starting last weekend I am having problems with some ports compiling. I am seeing warnings and errors from automake - autoconf when I compile certain ports. Here is an example from compile of libX11: ===> libX11-1.3.3_1,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake-1.10 - found ===> libX11-1

Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323

2010-09-20 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Chuck Swiger on Monday, 20 September 2010: > Hi, Steve-- > > On Sep 20, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Steve Ames wrote: > >> PS Would you mind not top posting > > > > Seriously? Top posting is somehow worse than scrolling to the bottom of > > pages > > of compile output to see a tiny response? Welco

Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323

2010-09-20 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi, Steve-- On Sep 20, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Steve Ames wrote: >> PS Would you mind not top posting > > Seriously? Top posting is somehow worse than scrolling to the bottom of pages > of compile output to see a tiny response? Welcome to the 21st century. Welcome to the FreeBSD mailing lists. Plea

Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323

2010-09-20 Thread Steve Ames
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:29:00PM +0100, David Southwell wrote: >>> Does SSL from ports declare something that we can #ifdef around? I >don't > >> really use pwlib anymore. If you can produce a patch that fixes your >issue > >> without breaking the case of using system openss

Re: x11/kdelibs4 build fails, can't find docbook

2010-09-20 Thread Janos Dohanics
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:07:16 +0200 olli hauer wrote: > On 2010-09-20 07:37, Janos Dohanics wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:31:18 -0400 > > Janos Dohanics wrote: > > > >> While building kde4-4.5.1, I get this error: > >> > >> # make install clean > >> ===> kde4-4.5.1 depends on > >> file: /u

Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323

2010-09-20 Thread David Southwell
- Original Message - > From: David Southwell > To: st...@energistic.com > Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ; m...@aldan.algebra.com > Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 5:28 AM > Subject: Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - > opal - & openh323 > > > > On

Re: update bacula-server 5.0.2 -> 5.0.3, Undefined symbol "ASN1_INTEGER_it

2010-09-20 Thread olli hauer
On 2010-09-20 22:58, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > On 09/20/10 19:39, olli hauer wrote: >> On 2010-09-19 08:20, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #0: Tue Sep 7 22:46:59 CEST 2010 >>> p...@candyman.i.inter-sonic.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >>> >>> Portupgrade of bacula-serv

Re: update bacula-server 5.0.2 -> 5.0.3, Undefined symbol "ASN1_INTEGER_it

2010-09-20 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 09/20/10 19:39, olli hauer wrote: > On 2010-09-19 08:20, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >> FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #0: Tue Sep 7 22:46:59 CEST 2010 >> p...@candyman.i.inter-sonic.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >> >> Portupgrade of bacula-server 5.0.2 -> 5.0.3 >> >> Starting bacula_fd. >> /libexe

Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323

2010-09-20 Thread Steve Ames
Does SSL from ports declare something that we can #ifdef around? I don't really use pwlib anymore. If you can produce a patch that fixes your issue without breaking the case of using system openssl I'll happly give it the nod. ports/pwlib is very old. Everything should be moving to ports/ptlib (

Re: x11/kdelibs4 build fails, can't find docbook

2010-09-20 Thread olli hauer
On 2010-09-20 07:37, Janos Dohanics wrote: > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:31:18 -0400 > Janos Dohanics wrote: > >> While building kde4-4.5.1, I get this error: >> >> # make install clean >> ===> kde4-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/kde4/bin/kdebugdialog - >> not found ===>Verifying install >> [

Re: port for pcattcp

2010-09-20 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
20.09.2010 15:42, SOUHARE, Hamed пишет: Hi, I went to install PCATTCP on my computer and I need to kwon the port on FreeBSD. Thanks. If i understand correctly, you mean this: http://www.pcausa.com/Utilities/pcattcp.htm But pcattcp is a windows port of `ttcp` tool. You can install ttcp from

Re: squidclamav 5.4

2010-09-20 Thread C-S
The best thing you can do is to try to create an update of this port by yourself and then submit the respective patch as a PR. Creating a port update is usually not that hard. Why not give it a try? You'll find more documentations in the Porter's Handbook. _

Re: update bacula-server 5.0.2 -> 5.0.3, Undefined symbol "ASN1_INTEGER_it

2010-09-20 Thread olli hauer
On 2010-09-19 08:20, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #0: Tue Sep 7 22:46:59 CEST 2010 > p...@candyman.i.inter-sonic.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > Portupgrade of bacula-server 5.0.2 -> 5.0.3 > > Starting bacula_fd. > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libbac.so.5: U

Re: Double versions installed

2010-09-20 Thread Jos Chrispijn
On 19-9-2010 23:34, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: You've never worked with GNU autotools, have you? :-) Nope, that is correct :-) Therefore, if a piece of third-party software requires autoconf or automake to build its configure scripts or Makefiles, it's up to the port maintainer of said third-par

Re: [CFT] games/aquaria: Underwater 2D Fantasy Action-Adventure

2010-09-20 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
* Anonymous (swel...@gmail.com) wrote: > Are such PITA to install games desired in the ports tree, anyway? I think in this case -data port is not needed. Sources should be packaged and put somewhere, and the game should show a pkg-message with instructions on how to obtain and where to put the da

Re: squidclamav 5.4

2010-09-20 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
20.09.2010 10:28, Mag. Werner Cyrmon пишет: squidclamav 5.4 is out a while - when will it appear in the ports tree? Regards Werner Please try patch attached. If it's ok for you, i'll create PR to update the port. -- Regards, Ruslan diff -ruNa squidclamav/Makefile squidclamav/Makefile --- sq

Re: Q about perl 5.12 and included newer port modules.

2010-09-20 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:07:33AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > I noticed, while looking at the SpamAssassin Port > (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin) that there are at lease one set of pm > dependencies that would pull in obsolete (older) ports versions that > would overwrite newer, built in modules in

Q about perl 5.12 and included newer port modules.

2010-09-20 Thread Michael Scheidell
I noticed, while looking at the SpamAssassin Port (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin) that there are at lease one set of pm dependencies that would pull in obsolete (older) ports versions that would overwrite newer, built in modules in perl 5.12. (Thanks Martin for this list below: As I said, its not just

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

2010-09-20 Thread Janne Snabb
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > One issue with either Git or Mercurial is that they are GPL. > AFAIK FreeBSD prefers to avoid GPL in the base or in critical > widely-used infrastructure if a viable non-GPL alternative > exists. The project currently uses Perforce for many sub-

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

2010-09-20 Thread Romain Tartière
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:20:39AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > SVN [...] is GPL; nope, it's under Apache License 2.0, see: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/LICENSE -- Romain Tartière http://romain.blogreen.org/ pgp: 8234 9A78 E7C0 B807 0B59 80FF BA4D 1D95 5112 3

Re: squidclamav 5.4

2010-09-20 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:28:27 +0200 Mag. Werner Cyrmon articulated: > squidclamav 5.4 is out a while - when will it appear in the ports > tree? Have you considered contacting the port maintainer: llev...@argosnet.com Perhaps he could assist you. -- Jerry ✌ freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

2010-09-20 Thread perryh
Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > Why not Git? One issue with either Git or Mercurial is that they are GPL. AFAIK FreeBSD prefers to avoid GPL in the base or in critical widely-used infrastructure if a viable non-GPL alternative exists. Granted SVN, currently used to manage src, is GPL; but its criti

port for pcattcp

2010-09-20 Thread SOUHARE, Hamed
Hi, I went to install PCATTCP on my computer and I need to kwon the port on FreeBSD. Thanks. -- Les donnees et renseignements contenus dans ce message sont personnels, confidentiels et secrets. Toute publication, utilisation ou diffusion, meme partielle, doit etre autorisee. Si vous n'etes pas

squidclamav 5.4

2010-09-20 Thread Mag. Werner Cyrmon
squidclamav 5.4 is out a while - when will it appear in the ports tree? Regards Werner ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...

squidclamav 5.4

2010-09-20 Thread Mag. Werner Cyrmon
squidclamav5.4 is out a while - when will it appear in the ports tree ... * Mag. Werner Cyrmon HTBLuVA Wr. Neustadt, Abt. EDVO Change is Life!(Remi, Ratatouille)

[CFT] games/aquaria: Underwater 2D Fantasy Action-Adventure

2010-09-20 Thread Anonymous
Anyone wants to play this proprietary game with GPLv2+ engine? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquaria_(video_game) To test: 1. obtain aquaria-lnx-humble-bundle.mojo.run and put into DISTDIR 2. install devel/mercurial 3. run `make maint-gen-distfile makesum' 4. run `make install' and selec

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2010-09-20 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsol

Re: editors/vim installs to /

2010-09-20 Thread Rob Farmer
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:34, Lars Engels wrote: > editors/vim-lite is console only. > That seems to disable a lot of other stuff too. .if !defined(LITE) MAKE_ARGS+= CONF_OPT_FEAT="--with-features=big" However, I will definitely take a look at it. Thank you for suggesting it. -- Rob Farm

Re: ptlib build failure - breaks pwlib - hence also asterisk - opal - & openh323

2010-09-20 Thread David Southwell
> > On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, David Southwell wrote: > > > /usr/ports/devel/pwlib/work/ptlib_v1_12_0/lib/obj_d/pssl.o > > > ../../ptclib/pssl.cxx: In constructor 'PSSLContext::PSSLContext(const > >> void*, PINDEX)': >> > ../../ptclib/pssl.cxx:917: error: invalid conversion from 'const > > SSL_METHOD*' t

Re: editors/vim installs to /

2010-09-20 Thread Lars Engels
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 05:38:21PM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 16:24, Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:51:42PM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 13:54, Wesley Shields wrote: > >> > While I agree that editors/vim could use the changes

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

2010-09-20 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 20/09/2010 03:01, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Is this just my impression or are we trying to build a bikeshed here? I think we all agree, that the stage is not set for a VCS change. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

2010-09-20 Thread jhell
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:17, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: In Message-Id: <174981284967...@web24.yandex.ru> 1). http://bit.ly/d5UrtN 2). http://www.keltia.net/BSDCan/paper.pdf 3). http://bit.ly/97Y8Xi 4). Because CVS just does not do any of this. Make your final comparison here: http://bit.ly/

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

2010-09-20 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
> > 1). http://bit.ly/d5UrtN > > 2). http://www.keltia.net/BSDCan/paper.pdf > > 3). http://bit.ly/97Y8Xi > > 4). Because CVS just does not do any of this. > > Make your final comparison here: > http://bit.ly/cyQBn8 > > For the sake of argument can you think of any reason to not switch ? Why not