Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread andrew clarke
On Sun 2010-10-31 19:27:17 UTC+0100, Michal Varga (varga.mic...@gmail.com) wrote: > > UPDATING should probably be amended upstream to correct this... > > > > Regards > > Andrew > > While I'm certainly no authority on the issue, I think that's the wrong > approach and generally (really not speak

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread Rob Farmer
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 14:59, Freddie Cash wrote: > Which is why I mentioned the "more safe" alternative, which you > snipped out of your reply: >  pkg_delete -xif portmaster > > Note the extra "i" in the middle, which makes the pkg_delete call > interactive, showing the package name to be delete

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/31/10 09:57, Alexandre wrote: | Hi, | | I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade | PORTMASTER 3.1. | It is written to do : | | # pkg_delete -f portmaster* | But when I type the first one, I got the message : | pkg_d

Re: GCC Upgrade failure for gcc-4.4

2010-10-31 Thread David Southwell
> On 31.10.2010 19:53 (UTC+1), David Southwell wrote: > > on AMD64 Intel quad core Freebsd 7.2 p3 > > dns1# pkg_info |grep gcc > > gcc-3.4.6_3,1 GNU Compiler Collection 3.4 > > gcc-4.2.5.20090325_5 GNU Compiler Collection 4.2 > > gcc-4.4.6.20101012 GNU Compiler Collection 4.4 > > gcc-4.5.2.2

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 31/10/2010 17:56, Freddie Cash wrote: >> The correct command is:  pkg_delete -xf portmaster >> >> -x does name globbing internally to pkg_delete, and should be used >> over any shell globbing (like *). > > So dogmatic.  '-x' is one alter

Re: GCC Upgrade failure for gcc-4.4

2010-10-31 Thread Rainer Hurling
On 31.10.2010 19:53 (UTC+1), David Southwell wrote: on AMD64 Intel quad core Freebsd 7.2 p3 dns1# pkg_info |grep gcc gcc-3.4.6_3,1 GNU Compiler Collection 3.4 gcc-4.2.5.20090325_5 GNU Compiler Collection 4.2 gcc-4.4.6.20101012 GNU Compiler Collection 4.4 gcc-4.5.2.20101028 GNU Compiler C

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 31/10/2010 17:56, Freddie Cash wrote: > The correct command is: pkg_delete -xf portmaster > > -x does name globbing internally to pkg_delete, and should be used > over any shell globbing (like *). > So dogmatic. '-x' is one alternative. A globbing expression is another. Either can be usef

GCC Upgrade failure for gcc-4.4

2010-10-31 Thread David Southwell
on AMD64 Intel quad core Freebsd 7.2 p3 dns1# pkg_info |grep gcc gcc-3.4.6_3,1 GNU Compiler Collection 3.4 gcc-4.2.5.20090325_5 GNU Compiler Collection 4.2 gcc-4.4.6.20101012 GNU Compiler Collection 4.4 gcc-4.5.2.20101028 GNU Compiler Collection 4.5 gccmakedep-1.0.2Create dependencies

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread Michal Varga
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 04:18 +1100, andrew clarke wrote: > > UPDATING should probably be amended upstream to correct this... > > Regards > Andrew While I'm certainly no authority on the issue, I think that's the wrong approach and generally (really not speaking about any specific case) - people,

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Alexandre wrote: > I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade > PORTMASTER 3.1. > It is written to do : > > # pkg_delete -f portmaster* > > # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster && make clean && make install clean > > But when I type the fi

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread Rene Ladan
Op 31-10-2010 17:57, Alexandre schreef: > Hi, > > I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade > PORTMASTER 3.1. > It is written to do : > > # pkg_delete -f portmaster* > > # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster && make clean && make install clean > > But when I type the f

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 05:57:52PM +0100, Alexandre wrote: > Hi, > > I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade > PORTMASTER 3.1. > It is written to do : > > # pkg_delete -f portmaster* > > # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster && make clean && make install clean > > Bu

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread Michal Varga
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:57 +0100, Alexandre wrote: > I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade > PORTMASTER 3.1. > It is written to do : > > # pkg_delete -f portmaster* The wildcard ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcard_character ) is interpreted by your shell and exp

Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread andrew clarke
On Sun 2010-10-31 17:57:52 UTC+0100, Alexandre (axel...@ymail.com) wrote: > I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade > PORTMASTER 3.1. > It is written to do : > > # pkg_delete -f portmaster* > > # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster && make clean && make install clean

Re: portmaster hangs waiting for grep

2010-10-31 Thread Peggy Wilkins
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Peggy Wilkins wrote: > I am doing my weekly run of portmaster to upgrade ports on my server: > > FreeBSD quarto.lib.uchicago.edu 7.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p3 > #0: Sat Sep 25 15:46:29 CDT 2010 > r...@quarto.lib.uchicago.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  a

Portmaster 3.1 upgrade

2010-10-31 Thread Alexandre
Hi, I read in /usr/ports/UPGRADING the instructions to properly upgrade PORTMASTER 3.1. It is written to do : # pkg_delete -f portmaster* # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster && make clean && make install clean But when I type the first one, I got the message : pkg_delete: No match. Portmaste

portmaster hangs waiting for grep

2010-10-31 Thread Peggy Wilkins
I am doing my weekly run of portmaster to upgrade ports on my server: FreeBSD quarto.lib.uchicago.edu 7.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p3 #0: Sat Sep 25 15:46:29 CDT 2010 r...@quarto.lib.uchicago.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I updated my ports tree two days ago (Friday, Oct 29) via c