FreeBSD Port: dovecot-2.0.7

2010-12-05 Thread Rick
Hi, I was wondering why vpopmail support is disabled in this port. I just tested it on 8-STABLE. It compiles and runs just fine, although I did have to comment out the extra arguments in dovecot's example configuration file (auth-vpopmail.conf.ext) because I'm using neither Maildir++ nor quotas:

Re: [patch] Re: A few questions about bsd.port.mk

2010-12-05 Thread Eitan Adler
Eek - wrong link: https://isis.poly.edu/~eitan/files/remove-machine-arch.patch is the patch I meant. > Here is a completely untested patch that makes the changes above. > http://isis.poly.edu/~eitan/files/remove-2004-hack.patch > Comments on both the patch and my questions are appreciated. > > > -

[patch] Re: A few questions about bsd.port.mk

2010-12-05 Thread Eitan Adler
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > I noticed a line in bsd.port.mk "Kludge for pre-3.0 systems" > > # Kludge for pre-3.0 ystems > MACHINE_ARCH?=       i386 > > According to cvs blame asami@ added both lines in revision 1.306 in 1999 > > Furthermore in bsd.port.mk it says ports sh

Re: emacs and gconf troubles

2010-12-05 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Andrea Venturoli writes: > On 12/05/10 15:18, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: >> How're you starting X server ? > Through KDM. >> And with which version are you seeing this behaviour ? > You mean: > %pkg_info|grep emacs > emacs-23.2_4,2 GNU editing macros > ? I tried that version as well, but I wa

Re: FreeBSD Port: otrs-2.4.9

2010-12-05 Thread Sergey Skvortsov
On 30.11.2010 21:01, Piotr Byliński wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to know when will otrs-3 > be available in freebsd ports ? Committed. -- Sergey Skvortsov mailto: s...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o

Re: emacs and gconf troubles

2010-12-05 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 12/05/10 15:18, Ashish SHUKLA wrote: How're you starting X server ? Through KDM. And with which version are you seeing this behaviour ? You mean: %pkg_info|grep emacs emacs-23.2_4,2 GNU editing macros ? And are you running GNOME, KDE, or any desktop environment ? KDE. I

Re: FreeBSD Port: sql-ledger-2.8.23

2010-12-05 Thread Chris Rees
On 5 December 2010 17:05, L. Derksen wrote: > Dear FreeBSD ports administrator(s), > > > I recently installed the FreeBSD port 'sql-ledger-2.8.23' when i came across > this article: > > *http://tinyurl.com/2v6g94f* > > Can you please comment on the security flaws that where found in this port? > A

FreeBSD Port: sql-ledger-2.8.23

2010-12-05 Thread L. Derksen
Dear FreeBSD ports administrator(s), I recently installed the FreeBSD port 'sql-ledger-2.8.23' when i came across this article: *http://tinyurl.com/2v6g94f* Can you please comment on the security flaws that where found in this port? Are these vulnerabilities also relevant to version 2.8.23?

Re: emacs and gconf troubles

2010-12-05 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
Andrea Venturoli 쓰시길: > Hello. > I'm having a small, low priority, trouble; more an annoyance in fact. > > Since a while, if I start an X11 emacs from a terminal window, after I > close emacs, the terminal window won't close with Ctrl-D; I have to > close the terminal windows by hand. > > With th

Re: x264 & gcc44 on amd64 -- and "generic" question about gccXX ports

2010-12-05 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Chip. You wrote 5 декабря 2010 г., 20:58:23: > I built x264 fine on amd64, and I do not have gcc44 installed. My gcc -v > reports: It is optional, and installing gcc46 before (by hands) helps. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov ___ freebs

Re: x264 & gcc44 on amd64 -- and "generic" question about gccXX ports

2010-12-05 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Lev Serebryakov on Sunday, 05 December 2010: > Hello, Freebsd-ports. > > Does somebody success in building x264 on amd64 host? It needs > gcc44, which is marker "BROKEN", and doesn't build in Fortran part, > indeed, but maybe fix known? > > Also, why we have `lang/gcc4x' ports

Re: packages compressed with xz

2010-12-05 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
05.12.2010 18:03, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: And those ones are all empty at start. So say, if you are compressing something really huge trying to use 4G of memory you end using that much memory between 2G - 3G of source data. And we will need 512MB to decompress that hunk of data. Are the packages

Re: packages compressed with xz

2010-12-05 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 11:41:29 -0500 Eitan Adler wrote: > >> > >>  Curious - which one? > > > >        OpenOffice(-3)? > > He told me on IRC - something in games/ > > $grep -R "NO_PACKAGE" /usr/ports/games :-) Hum, looks like either they got smaller or QAT doesn't have all the games packages buil

Re: packages compressed with xz

2010-12-05 Thread Eitan Adler
>> >>  Curious - which one? > >        OpenOffice(-3)? He told me on IRC - something in games/ $grep -R "NO_PACKAGE" /usr/ports/games :-) -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-port

Re: packages compressed with xz

2010-12-05 Thread Robert Huff
Eitan Adler writes: > > The biggest package that can be produced by a port it's a bit over 10G. > > Curious - which one? OpenOffice(-3)? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: packages compressed with xz

2010-12-05 Thread Eitan Adler
> The biggest package that can be produced by a port it's a bit over 10G. > Curious - which one? -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebs

Re: FreeBSD Port: davical-0.9.9.3

2010-12-05 Thread C-S
I don't think that you loose your data, as it is stored in the pgsql database which is not replaced by the package. Anyhow, it is always good to have a backup. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-

Re: packages compressed with xz

2010-12-05 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:07:51 +0200 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 30.11.2010 04:40, Julien Laffaye wrote: > > You can specify limits during compression, so the question is > > should we do that so that hosts with N MB of RAM can decompress > > packages? Do we retain the compression ratio over bzip2

Re: Proposal moving *spell dicts to ports/textproc/*spell/dicts

2010-12-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> > Hello, > > > >> As I said some weeks ago I personally don't like much the use of > >> ports/{french,chinese,whatever}/ directories. I saw that openbsd > >> created sub directories in the aspell port. I think this is a really > >> good idea, it's really easier to find. > >> > >> I don't think ge

Re: amd64/152823: Request for new port: projectM

2010-12-05 Thread Andriy Gapon
The following reply was made to PR ports/152823; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andriy Gapon To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, rank1see...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/152823: Request for new port: projectM Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:36:43 +0200 This is a ports PR, not for amd64 kernel arch

Re: ports/152823: Request for new port: projectM

2010-12-05 Thread avg
Synopsis: Request for new port: projectM Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: avg Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Dec 5 14:37:50 UTC 2010 Responsible-Changed-Why: Reclassify. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152823

x264 & gcc44 on amd64 -- and "generic" question about gccXX ports

2010-12-05 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-ports. Does somebody success in building x264 on amd64 host? It needs gcc44, which is marker "BROKEN", and doesn't build in Fortran part, indeed, but maybe fix known? Also, why we have `lang/gcc4x' ports without OPTIONS or subports for fortran, obj-c, java? -- // Bla

Re: emacs and gconf troubles

2010-12-05 Thread Ashish SHUKLA
Hi Andrea, Andrea Venturoli writes: > Hello. > I'm having a small, low priority, trouble; more an annoyance in fact. > Since a while, if I start an X11 emacs from a terminal window, after I > close emacs, the terminal window won't close with Ctrl-D; I have to > close the terminal windows by hand.

Re: packages compressed with xz

2010-12-05 Thread Lars Engels
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 11:19:21PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > > On 30 Nov 2010, at 03:16, jhell wrote: > > > Agreed. Soon can be quantified by actual need and of which there is not > > much need except for larger packages but adding this would just add > > unneeded complication to the sy

Re: Proposal moving *spell dicts to ports/textproc/*spell/dicts

2010-12-05 Thread David DEMELIER
2010/12/4 Thierry Thomas : > Le sam  4 déc 10 à 11:58:44 +0100, David DEMELIER >  écrivait : >> Hi, > > Hello, > >> As I said some weeks ago I personally don't like much the use of >> ports/{french,chinese,whatever}/ directories. I saw that openbsd >> created sub directories in the aspell port. I