On 02/04/2011 06:53 AM, Steve Wills wrote:
> On 02/03/11 15:15, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> Hi there,
>
>> I only just noticed that you've added a port for xpra.
>> I wasn't aware of that and you're pointing to the source on my server,
>> so I guess that it means I have to be careful not to remove it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/11 15:15, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I only just noticed that you've added a port for xpra.
> I wasn't aware of that and you're pointing to the source on my server,
> so I guess that it means I have to be careful not to remove it f
2011/2/3 Sam Fourman Jr. :
>
>> Are you the installed libtextcat is the latest version ?
>>
>> regards,
>> Bapt
>
> no libtextcat was not installed, after installing this.. it built fine and
> everything works.
>
> should libtextcat not be a dependency so that it gets built even if I don't
> have i
> Are you the installed libtextcat is the latest version ?
>
> regards,
> Bapt
>
no libtextcat was not installed, after installing this.. it built fine and
everything works.
should libtextcat not be a dependency so that it gets built even if I don't
have it installed?
--
Sam Fourman Jr.
Fourm
Hi there,
I only just noticed that you've added a port for xpra.
I wasn't aware of that and you're pointing to the source on my server,
so I guess that it means I have to be careful not to remove it from now on?
In the future, a simple notification email could prevent me from
breaking stuff uninte
Chip Camden writes:
> Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap yet?
I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 yesterday.
Subjectively, building seemed tyo go quicker than OO.
After minimal testing, it appears to behave correctly.
Quoth Max Brazhnikov on Thursday, 03 February 2011:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:04:23 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except
> > > that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g
> > > counts 178 missing files.
>
2011/2/3 Max Brazhnikov :
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:04:23 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> > I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except
>> > that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g
>> > counts 178 missing files.
>> >
>> > 19 have "x86_64" in
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 20:04:23 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > I have no problem installing, reinstalling, or using LO on i386, except
> > that I get many warning messages on the uninstall. But pkg_info -g
> > counts 178 missing files.
> >
> > 19 have "x86_64" in their paths. These directories d
On 03.02.2011 15:11 (UTC+1), thie...@freebsd.org wrote:
Selon Rainer Hurling le jeu 3 fév 14:19:16 2011 :
Ok, so I usually have to take care to link libraries like libmpl,
libopa etc. in addition to libmpich (or using the wrappers if possible).
Yes, this is the idea. Note: libopa is rarely n
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Subbsd wrote:
> Hi,
>
Sorry all, i just have 2 version of .h:
pkg_which /usr/local/include/kdeversion.h
/usr/local/kde4/include/kdeversion.h
kdelibs-3.5.10_6
kdelibs-4.5.5
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Subbsd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ...
> ---
>
>
Ive try compile conftest.cpp by hands:
cat conftest.cpp
#define PACKAGE_NAME ""
#define PACKAGE_TARNAME ""
#define PACKAGE_VERSION ""
#define PACKAGE_STRING ""
#define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT ""
#define PACKAGE_URL ""
#define STDC_
2011/2/3 Sam Fourman Jr. :
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> 2011/2/3 :
>> > Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> >
>> >> your built is failing because you ran it twice.
>> >>
>> >> make can't be run twice you should make clean before
>> >
>> > Doesn't this point to a
Hi,
Ive got error in building libreoffice 3.3.0 process (WITH_KDE4 enabled)
(FreeBSD-9, amd64)
---
...
checking for Qt4 headers... /usr/local/include/qt4
checking for Qt4 libraries... /usr/local/lib/qt4
checking for moc-qt4... /usr/local/bin/moc-qt4
checking for KDE4 headers... /usr/local/kde4/inc
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 2011/2/3 :
> > Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >
> >> your built is failing because you ran it twice.
> >>
> >> make can't be run twice you should make clean before
> >
> > Doesn't this point to a bug in the Makefile, dependencies, etc?
>
Selon Rainer Hurling le jeu 3 fév 14:19:16 2011 :
Ok, so I usually have to take care to link libraries like libmpl,
libopa etc. in addition to libmpich (or using the wrappers if
possible).
Yes, this is the idea. Note: libopa is rarely needed.
Yet another solution could be to configure m
Am 03.02.2011 13:35 (UTC+1) schrieb thie...@freebsd.org:
Selon Rainer Hurling le jeu 3 fév 12:45:29 2011 :
These symbols belong to libmpl:
nm -A /usr/local/lib/libmpl.a | grep MPL_
So you have to link with -lmpl (and maybe with -lopa too).
I think I do understand this for software which us
Selon Rainer Hurling le jeu 3 fév 12:45:29 2011 :
These symbols belong to libmpl:
nm -A /usr/local/lib/libmpl.a | grep MPL_
So you have to link with -lmpl (and maybe with -lopa too).
I think I do understand this for software which uses MPICH2.
With your suggestion I am able to build math/
Thanks for answering.
Am 02.02.2011 22:29 (UTC+1) schrieb Thierry Thomas:
Le mer 2 fév 11 à 21:54:34 +0100, Rainer Hurling
écrivait :
Dear list,
Hello,
since there is no maintainer for net/mpich2 I am writing directly to the
list. Hope this is ok.
I need MPICH2 for math/R (package Rmpi)
On 02/02/11 10:25, Anonymous wrote:
"O. Hartmann" writes:
Hello.
I just upgraded openoffice-3.2.1 to openoffice-org-3.3.0 and found
myself in a serious issue. Opening openoffice works only sporadically,
in most cases I get the error:
XDM authorization key matches an existing
client!/usr/local
2011/2/3 :
> Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
>> your built is failing because you ran it twice.
>>
>> make can't be run twice you should make clean before
>
> Doesn't this point to a bug in the Makefile, dependencies, etc?
> Last I knew the whole point of make was to build what needs to
> be built, s
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> your built is failing because you ran it twice.
>
> make can't be run twice you should make clean before
Doesn't this point to a bug in the Makefile, dependencies, etc?
Last I knew the whole point of make was to build what needs to
be built, skipping any parts which a
22 matches
Mail list logo
