More fallout from the devel/libtool problem [...] but then libtool
attempts to link the shared libraries with the base system compiler
and toolchain.
Thanks for the explanation! Things start to make sense now...
Best,
Klaus
___
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 06:43:51 +0200 Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 05:02:14PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:33:00 +0200 Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:44:12 +0200 Alex Kozlov
Hi.
Ive have server with huge of RAM (32 GB) and after mounting tmpfs on
/tmp try use it for more faster port building. Most of the ports work
when set WRKDIRPREFIX=/tmp/ports in /etc/make.conf is magnificently.
But part of ports not, for example: /usr/ports/devel/ode
% make -V WRKDIRPREFIX
Hi,
I picked this up on Google Alerts. I am the maintainer for SDL Perl
and we have over the past year fixed a lot of bugs in SDL Perl. In
addition to
that we have also migrated Frozen Bubble over to 2.2.2beta which
should fix this problem. Please consider packaging the following
packages.
Hello!
I'm interested if anyone managed to build BURG loader
(http://code.google.com/p/burg/ https://launchpad.net/burg) under
FreeBSD?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
“In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are
all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu)
http://atmarama.net |
Hi Kartik,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:29:58 -0800 (PST) kthakore wrote:
I picked this up on Google Alerts. I am the maintainer for SDL Perl
and we have over the past year fixed a lot of bugs in SDL Perl. In
addition to
It was my first idea when I faced with the problem. However new
SDL versions
nvidia offers a new FreeBSD /amd64 ready 64Bit driver, 260.19.44. We are
about to equipt several boxes with newer nVidia Fermi based graphics
cards (570 and 560Ti). On Linux boxes (Suse 10.XX, I do not know, a
recent one) a GTX570 won't work with the older nvidia 256.53 driver, we
had to
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:12:38AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 06:43:51 +0200 Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 05:02:14PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:33:00 +0200 Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Boris
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
nvidia offers a new FreeBSD /amd64 ready 64Bit driver, 260.19.44. We
are about to equipt several boxes with newer nVidia Fermi based
graphics cards (570 and 560Ti). On Linux boxes (Suse 10.XX, I do not
know, a recent one) a GTX570 won't work
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:46 AM, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
Could you please change the SAMBA_PORT= directive in samba-libsmbclient to
SAMBA_PORT?= samba34 so it can be overridden by make.conf or command line ?
No, I believe it's a bad idea.
There is probably some bad magic that will
I compiled the intel driver with the following patch:
--- src/i830_video.c.orig 2011-03-12 18:00:01.0 +0200
+++ src/i830_video.c2011-03-12 17:59:08.0 +0200
@@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@
static void
i830_fill_colorkey (ScreenPtr pScreen, uint32_t key, RegionPtr clipboxes)
{
-
Just install frozen bubble with
cpan Games:: FrozenBubble
If you give me your details for freebsd I can try to get a portable
frozenbubble package made.
Kartik Thakore
On 2011-03-12, at 4:35 AM, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
Hi Kartik,
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:29:58 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Work is now underway to bring GNU make 3.82 into the tree. Sadly, there are
a number of rather unfortunate backwards incompatibility issues between this
and 3.81 which makes a simple replacement unworkable.
A new port,
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Jeremy Messenger
mezz.free...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Work is now underway to bring GNU make 3.82 into the tree. Sadly, there are
a number of rather unfortunate backwards incompatibility issues
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
I recent did a first-pass experimental ports run with gmake3.82. The
results from that were pretty bad: 38 confirmed errors (5 more possible),
with ~1100 ports as collateral damage, mostly from audio/portaudio and
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:25, timur@ wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:46 AM, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
Could you please change the SAMBA_PORT= directive in samba-libsmbclient to
SAMBA_PORT?= samba34 so it can be overridden by make.conf or command line ?
No, I believe it's a bad idea.
Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
I recent did a first-pass experimental ports run with gmake3.82. The
results from that were pretty bad: 38 confirmed errors (5 more possible),
FWIW, I expect a number of these will be trivial fixes where the
commands for a Makefile target are indented
Jeremy Messenger mezz.free...@gmail.com wrote:
You can remove devel/ORBit and irc/xchat-gnome from your patch. I have
fixed those ports to build with gmake 3.82.
I fixed net/xtraceroute and deskutils/contacts and sent a patch to
the maintainer of misc/gnustep-examples... since I had those
On Mar 11, 2011, at 23:14 , Doug Barton wrote:
What harm will come from publicizing this problem and asking for help from
the community?
Seems 'the community' has already awoken and started fixing stuff without the
second test -exp run even having finished. I rest my case.
-aDe
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 06:38:12PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
FWIW, I expect a number of these will be trivial fixes where the
commands for a Makefile target are indented with spaces instead of
tabs.
Yeah, it kind of looked that way on first glance.
mcl
On 03/12/2011 00:37, Subbsd wrote:
Hi.
Ive have server with huge of RAM (32 GB) and after mounting tmpfs on
/tmp try use it for more faster port building. Most of the ports work
when set WRKDIRPREFIX=/tmp/ports in /etc/make.conf is magnificently.
But part of ports not, for example:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening in private around here and
the only way to solve that problem is to open the doors.
Would you please offer examples of decisions that you feel that way about?
mcl
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/12/2011 00:37, Subbsd wrote:
Hi.
Ive have server with huge of RAM (32 GB) and after mounting tmpfs on
/tmp try use it for more faster port building. Most of the ports work
when set WRKDIRPREFIX=/tmp/ports in
On 03/12/2011 12:45, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening in private around here and
the only way to solve that problem is to open the doors.
Would you please offer examples of decisions that you feel that way
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 13:34 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/12/2011 12:45, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening in private around here and
the only way to solve that problem is to open the doors.
Would
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 01:34:58PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Would you please offer examples of decisions that you feel that way about?
Clearly it would be inappropriate for me to comment publicly on
things that were discussed in private, so no, I'm not going to do
that.
You just discussed
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 22:46 +0100, Michal Varga wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 13:34 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/12/2011 12:45, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening in private around here and
the only
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:28:40AM +0100, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
If anybody is interested I could consolidate my results and post a few
patches.
I would like to see them.
This is the kind of really-dull-but-necessary work that we need to have
people work on to fight the creeping dependencies
On 03/12/2011 13:47, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 01:34:58PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Would you please offer examples of decisions that you feel that way about?
Clearly it would be inappropriate for me to comment publicly on
things that were discussed in private, so no, I'm
On 03/12/2011 13:51, Michal Varga wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 22:46 +0100, Michal Varga wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 13:34 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/12/2011 12:45, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening
Howdy,
As many of you are no doubt already aware, much work has been undertaken
to make clang the default compiler for the src tree starting with
9.0-RELEASE. It is not 100% certain that this change will be made, but
it's looking more likely every day.
This raises an interesting question
On Sat 12 Mar 2011 at 13:53:07 PST Mark Linimon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:28:40AM +0100, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
If anybody is interested I could consolidate my results and post a few patches.
I would like to see them.
This is the kind of really-dull-but-necessary work that we need to
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 02:12:34PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
I'm not aware of any tool that will display a similar dependency tree
for a port *before* it is installed.
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portdependencytree.py
Note: it's running a live set of queries on the tree, so it's slow.
mcl
On Sat 12 Mar 2011 at 14:21:35 PST Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 02:12:34PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
I'm not aware of any tool that will display a similar dependency tree
for a port *before* it is installed.
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portdependencytree.py
Note: it's
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 02:35:23PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
Is the underlying sourcecode available somewhere?
The code is really gross :-(
Right now I don't have the cycles to 'productize' it, sorry. Feel
free to abuse that server in the meantime.
mcl
Mark Linimon said:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 02:12:34PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
I'm not aware of any tool that will display a similar dependency tree
for a port *before* it is installed.
http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portdependencytree.py
Note: it's running a live set of queries on
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening in private around here and
the only way to solve that problem is to open the doors.
Would you please offer examples of decisions that you feel that way about?
We need not look any farther than
On 03/12/2011 14:12, Charlie Kester wrote:
I'm not aware of any tool that will display a similar dependency tree
for a port *before* it is installed.
portmaster doesn't _quite_ do that, but it does walk you through all of
the config screens (and thus, the related dependencies) prior to
I'm sorry that I did not have a chance to run the gmake -exp sooner.
Up until recently, I haven't been doing any -exps myself, other than to
test the setup on pointyhat-west (on which I continue to find bugs in the
newer, generalized, codebase). I put the gmake -exp on there primarily as
a way
On Sat 12 Mar 2011 at 15:25:09 PST Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/12/2011 14:12, Charlie Kester wrote:
I'm not aware of any tool that will display a similar dependency tree
for a port *before* it is installed.
portmaster doesn't _quite_ do that, but it does walk you through all of
the config
On Mar 12, 2011, at 17:22 , b. f. wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening in private around here and
the only way to solve that problem is to open the doors.
Would you please offer examples of decisions that you feel that
On Sat 12 Mar 2011 at 15:57:09 PST Charlie Kester wrote:
What's really needed are better tools to help maintainers see what
their ports are installing, and for them to exercise more disciple in
asking Is this really necessary, or should I make it optional? Is it
really a run dependency, or is it
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening in private around here and
the only way to solve that problem is to open the doors.
Would you please offer examples
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 02:12:34PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
On Sat 12 Mar 2011 at 13:53:07 PST Mark Linimon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:28:40AM +0100, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
If anybody is interested I could consolidate my results and post a few
patches.
I would like to see
A greatly expanded version of my original message is now at:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/GmakeTODO
Note: the second run is currently paused while we are working on hardware.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Actually, not at random, it was the latest one that came across
the threshhold. Sorry.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 03/12/2011 17:14, Rob Farmer wrote:
Also, you suddenly getting involved probably didn't help, because it
just gave the appearance that you guys were trying to double-team
Rob,
I appreciate your thoughtful response to this topic. In fairness to
Mark, I am the one who expanded the scope of
replying to myself.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 05:51:44PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
Up until recently, I haven't been doing any -exps myself, other than to
test the setup on pointyhat-west (on which I continue to find bugs in the
newer, generalized, codebase).
Slightly untrue: the previous one
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 06:00:40PM -0600, Ade Lovett wrote:
Throwing out a PR with exp-run probably desirable is not particularly
useful, and shows a certain naivety when it comes to such wide-ranging
changes.
This seems a little harsh to me. OTOH, I think it's become much clearer
to me
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:07, subbsd@ wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/12/2011 00:37, Subbsd wrote:
Hi.
Ive have server with huge of RAM (32 GB) and after mounting tmpfs on
/tmp try use it for more faster port building. Most of the ports work
Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote:
A few minutes ago, I was answering a post on the forums, in which
a user expressed surprise (and outrage) that the phpmyadmin port
was installing libX11 and similar things on his server. By
installing it myself and then using pkg_tree -v to examine
On 03/12/2011 18:13, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Charlie Kestercorky1...@comcast.net wrote:
A few minutes ago, I was answering a post on the forums, in which
a user expressed surprise (and outrage) that the phpmyadmin port
was installing libX11 and similar things on his server. By
On 03/12/2011 16:00, Ade Lovett wrote:
On Mar 12, 2011, at 17:22 , b. f. wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening in private around
here and the only way to solve that problem is to open the
doors.
Would you please offer
On 3/13/11, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mar 12, 2011, at 17:22 , b. f. wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:14:50PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
There are way too many things happening in private around here and
the only way to solve that problem is to open the doors.
Would you please
On Sat 12 Mar 2011 at 18:28:42 PST Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/12/2011 18:13, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Charlie Kestercorky1...@comcast.net wrote:
A few minutes ago, I was answering a post on the forums, in which
a user expressed surprise (and outrage) that the phpmyadmin port
was installing
On Mar 12, 2011, at 20:30 , Doug Barton wrote:
The real problem here is that there is a very tiny subset of FreeBSD
developers who insist on taking on a disproportionate amount of behind the
scenes responsibilities, and are incredibly resistant to allowing anyone
else into the inner
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
... what is really needed is for the OPTIONS framework to take
environmental preferences into account when dealing with defaults
... if WITHOUT_X11 is defined in make.conf, then the defaults for
OPTIONS that are related to requiring X11 stuff should be off
On 03/10/11 11:28, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
By making a few trivial changes i can make xorg-7.5.1 fully
independent on run-time of Python, Perl and Bison. The same can be
done for kde-lite-3.5.10_8 when I also disable the Perl support in
net-snmp, which is a dependency of kdeutils-3.5.10_8.
If
58 matches
Mail list logo
