Re: Skype with sound and video support :)

2011-05-18 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:46:14 +0200 Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote: On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:01:41 -0700 Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote: Please put the information in this message (or at least most of it) into ports/UPDATING so a few less people running old kernels

Re: editors/libreoffice: can not compile, crash on FreeBSD 9.0-CUR/amd64

2011-05-18 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 18/05/2011 12:10 O. Hartmann said the following: --- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in:

Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-18 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: I am proposing a new one: x - expired    This report is over 2 years old. If no one has bothered to fix it    by now, then in all probability no one will. Not gonna happen, for reasons that have been mentioned previously. If

Issue with apr1 on up to date freebsd stable

2011-05-18 Thread eculp
For a couple of days I have not been able to upgrade apr1. It dies with libtool that I've also rebuilt. checking for minix/config.h... no checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes checking for library containing strerror... none required checking whether system uses

devel/apr1 1.4.4 regression (was: 1.4.4 breaks apache22)

2011-05-18 Thread Mike Jakubik
Hi, While troubleshooting my problem with apr 1.4.4 and mod_jk i discovered from upstream (devs on apr maillist) that there is a regression in this version, reverting the port to a previous version might be a good idea while a fix is created.

libdispatch-174 is marked as broken: does not link on 9.X.

2011-05-18 Thread Ivan Klymenko
I have the system FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r222032 amd64 Port devel/libdispatch well constructed and works, why he: libdispatch-174 is marked as broken: does not link on 9.X. ? .if ${OSVERSION} = 90 ${ARCH} == amd64 BROKEN= does not link on 9.X .endif Thanks!

Re: Issue with apr1 on up to date freebsd stable

2011-05-18 Thread Olli Hauer
On 2011-05-18 20:57, eculp wrote: Quoting eculp ec...@encontacto.net: For a couple of days I have not been able to upgrade apr1. It dies with libtool that I've also rebuilt. checking for minix/config.h... no checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes checking for library

FreeBSD Port: p5-DBD-mysql-4.018

2011-05-18 Thread Joseph Mingrone
Hello, I see the following error during the build: dbdimp.c: In function 'mysql_db_FETCH_attrib': dbdimp.c:2447: error: 'sv_undef' undeclared (first use in this function) % uname -a FreeBSD awarnach.mathstat.dal.ca 8.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jul 12 20:55:11 UTC 2010

Re: Optional Patches

2011-05-18 Thread Matthew Pounsett
Following up my own post. Bleargh. On 2011/05/18, at 17:29, Matthew Pounsett wrote: .if defined(FOO) PATCH_SITES= http://location.site.com/path/ PATCHFILES= port-${PORTVERSION}.patch PATCH_DIST_STRIP= -p1 .endif I should note that I have actually been doing this using '.if

Re: Optional Patches

2011-05-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 18/05/2011 22:29, Matthew Pounsett wrote: I've added a new option (call it 'FOO') to the OPTIONS definition, and I'm attempting to add something like this directly below MASTER_SITES near the top of the Makefile: .if defined(FOO) PATCH_SITES= http://location.site.com/path/

Re: Optional Patches

2011-05-18 Thread Doug Barton
On 05/18/2011 15:10, Matthew Seaman wrote: # Testing both WITH_ and WITHOUT_ is a good idea... I'm not sure why you would need to test both, unless it's to catch wacky stuff coming in from the environment? The usual way is to test the opposite of the default. So for default on you would

Re: Optional Patches

2011-05-18 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 18/05/2011 23:17, Doug Barton wrote: On 05/18/2011 15:10, Matthew Seaman wrote: # Testing both WITH_ and WITHOUT_ is a good idea... I'm not sure why you would need to test both, unless it's to catch wacky stuff coming in from the environment? That's one reason. Another is that it makes

Re: Issue with apr1 on up to date freebsd stable

2011-05-18 Thread eculp
Quoting Olli Hauer oha...@freebsd.org: On 2011-05-18 20:57, eculp wrote: Quoting eculp ec...@encontacto.net: For a couple of days I have not been able to upgrade apr1. It dies with libtool that I've also rebuilt. checking for minix/config.h... no checking whether it is safe to define

Re: Optional Patches

2011-05-18 Thread Matthew Pounsett
Based on the responses here it sounds like I've been doing nothing wrong so I played around a bit more. I guess in my testing there must've been some combination of things I didn't get right... I did a bunch more testing and eventually I made it work doing exactly what I've been doing, except

Re: Issue with apr1 on up to date freebsd stable

2011-05-18 Thread Ade Lovett
On May 18, 2011, at 17:44 , eculp wrote: checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes checking for library containing strerror... none required checking whether system uses EBCDIC... no performing libtool configuration... ./configure: 9904: Syntax error: word unexpected