Re: RFC: change to bsd.perl.mk

On 07/15/2011 22:07, Mark Linimon wrote: > Per Doug Barton's suggestion, I have reworked the long-standing patch > to bsd.perl.mk to be an exact copy of the logic in bsd.port.mk, and > done an -exp run. Does anyone have any objection if I commit this > patch? This is actually the exact opposite o

RFC: change to bsd.perl.mk

Per Doug Barton's suggestion, I have reworked the long-standing patch to bsd.perl.mk to be an exact copy of the logic in bsd.port.mk, and done an -exp run. Does anyone have any objection if I commit this patch? Notes: - some code in bsd.perl.mk, which had been intended as part of gabor's SoC

Re: ports/144597: security/openssh-portable fails to compile with KERBEROS enabled

On 07/15/2011 06:28 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 07/15/2011 06:23 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:39:01PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Hey people, I was looking over old unresolved PR's. I came across this one: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.

Re: Submitting a follow up to a port update

On 12 July 2011 23:38, Gavin McDonald wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm the current maintainer for the scons port. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=158205 > > As you can see, on the 24th June an update/patch was requested. > I also received 2 emails, one from skreuzer via FreeBSD-gnats-submit

Submitting a follow up to a port update

Hi All, I'm the current maintainer for the scons port. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=158205 As you can see, on the 24th June an update/patch was requested. I also received 2 emails, one from skreuzer via FreeBSD-gnats-submit and then also one from Edwin via bug-followup. So I chec

Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2)

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: On 07/15/2011 04:57 PM, Warren Block wrote: FWIW, I think the original code with a better regex like Jung-uk Kim has in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-July/068737.html is still the way to go. If the port requires a sp

Re: ports/144597: security/openssh-portable fails to compile with KERBEROS enabled

On 07/15/2011 06:23 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:39:01PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Hey people, I was looking over old unresolved PR's. I came across this one: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144597 When I sent a message to the submitt

Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2)

On 07/15/2011 04:57 PM, Warren Block wrote: FWIW, I think the original code with a better regex like Jung-uk Kim has in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-July/068737.html is still the way to go. If the port requires a special desktop entry filename, that seems beyond the sco

Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2)

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Warren Block píše v pá 15. 07. 2011 v 07:15 -0600: It could also be made polymorphic, basing what it does on the number of fields rather than a new DESKTOP_ENTRIESv2 define. I believe that's impossible because you can create several desktop entries b

Re: What about creating an office team

On 15 July 2011 16:35, Philipp Ost wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > [...] >> >> maybe many more? (you can propose your candidate here :)) > > What about math/gnumeric? It's a nice, lightweight spreadsheet if one > doesn't want the `bloat' that is open-/libreoffice. > > Good luck with your proj

Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2)

Warren Block píše v pá 15. 07. 2011 v 07:15 -0600: > It could also be made polymorphic, basing what it does on the > number of fields rather than a new DESKTOP_ENTRIESv2 define. I believe that's impossible because you can create several desktop entries by repeating the quadruple of values in thi

Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2)

On 15 Jul 2011 03:16, "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" wrote: > > On 07/14/2011 02:29 PM, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> >> On 14 Jul 2011 17:58, "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" > > wrote: >> >Joe Average user who doesn't actually install the ports shouldn't be >> expected to read UPDA

Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2)

> But then we would still need to add a check to check-desktop-entries > for DESKTOP_ENTRIESv2 that would detect illegal characters in the > filename. Since this is not user settable IMHO the check should really be done in portlint, not in b.p.m. -- Eitan Adler __

Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2)

2011/7/15 Warren Block : >> How about something like this: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=158936 > > Wouldn't the point of using a separate filename argument be to let the user > specify exactly what the name is?  Here you end up with the same > system-processed filename.  Possibl

Re: What about creating an office team

Baptiste Daroussin wrote: [...] maybe many more? (you can propose your candidate here :)) What about math/gnumeric? It's a nice, lightweight spreadsheet if one doesn't want the `bloat' that is open-/libreoffice. Good luck with your project! Regards, Philipp

Re: What about creating an office team

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, > > Is there anyone interested here to be part of an office team? the goal of > that team will be to take care of the office components of the ports. > > Those are quite important for the desktop experience and having relying on > on

Re: What about creating an office team

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:22:52 +0200, Olivier Duchateau wrote: And about editors/abiword ? even if this port is outdated, it can be added I think. I use development release (v2.9.1), everything works fine except collaboration (telepathy and xmpp) plugin. 2011/7/15 Baptiste Daroussin : Hi, Is th

Re: What about creating an office team

And about editors/abiword ? even if this port is outdated, it can be added I think. I use development release (v2.9.1), everything works fine except collaboration (telepathy and xmpp) plugin. 2011/7/15 Baptiste Daroussin : > Hi, > > Is there anyone interested here to be part of an office team? th

What about creating an office team

Hi, Is there anyone interested here to be part of an office team? the goal of that team will be to take care of the office components of the ports. Those are quite important for the desktop experience and having relying on one person being able through a team to potentially have multiple per

Re: [RFC] A trivial change for DESKTOP_ENTRIES (take 2)

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Scot Hetzel wrote: 2011/7/14 Pav Lucistnik : Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v čt 14. 07. 2011 v 11:57 -0500: entry.  I assume that the filename of the desktop entry is unimportant, The filename of desktop entry should be 100% inconsequential, and our only care should be

Re: p5-XML-LibXML 1.80,1

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:40:27 -0500 ajtiM articulated: > Thank you very much. There was one other p5* port and looks like that > portmaster is not usable more for update. I would suggest using either portupdate or portmanager. Both can handle this installation/update for you without incident. --

Re: p5-XML-LibXML 1.80,1

On Friday 15 July 2011 04:51:43 Oliver Heesakkers wrote: > /p5-XML-LibXML Thank you very much. There was one other p5* port and looks like that portmaster is not usable more for update. Mitja http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa ___ freebsd-ports@f

Re: p5-XML-LibXML 1.80,1

Op donderdag 14 juli 2011 19:25:59 schreef ajtiM: > Problem to update p5-XML-LibXML 1.80,1 on FreebSD 8.2: > I used portmaster but I did try wit "make install" too: > (...) > Can't locate XML/SAX.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.12.4 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.4/BSDPAN >