RE: Submitting a follow up to a port update

2011-07-17 Thread Gavin McDonald
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > po...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Rees > Sent: Saturday, 16 July 2011 11:33 AM > To: ga...@16degrees.com.au > Cc: skreu...@freebsd.org; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Submitting a follow up

Re: comms/umcs7840 doesn't compile under FreeBSD 8.2-stable

2011-07-17 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Torfinn. You wrote 17 июля 2011 г., 16:47:44: > I just upgraded my machine to FreeBSD 8.2-stable (it was running > 8.1-stable before): > tingo@kg-v2$ uname -a > FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Sat Jul 16 > 02:07:14 CEST 2011 r...@kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/

Xfce 4.8 updates synchronized with latest snapshot of marcuscom.com repository

2011-07-17 Thread Olivier Duchateau
Hi, I've just created tarball [1] with latest updates of Xfce 4.8 (core). Archive is synchronized with latest snapshot of marcuscom repository (GNOME). If you intend to test this: 1. Copy the Mk/bsd.xfce.mk (from mc_xfce-4.8.tar.bz2) 2. Upgrade Xfce components, following this order: - devel/xf

Re: audio/musicpd and libsndfile dependency

2011-07-17 Thread David Demelier
On 16/07/2011 15:13, Chris Rees wrote: On 16 Jul 2011 13:03, "David Demelier" mailto:demelier.da...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I've just realized that libsndfile is required for musicpd. see : > > $ ldd /usr/local/bin/musicpd >... >libFLAC.so.10 => /usr/local/lib/l

Re: ports/158179: some packages do not fully honor -P dir option in pkg_add(1)

2011-07-17 Thread Chris Rees
On 17 July 2011 11:55, Marco Bröder wrote: > On Sat July 16 2011 18:21:12 Chris Rees wrote: >> Bear in mind they should work fine if the port doesn't hardcode absolute >> paths. > > Yes, they actually do! Please do not remove them, because they are not as > buggy as it is claimed here. I often use

Re: ports/158179: some packages do not fully honor -P dir option in pkg_add(1)

2011-07-17 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
current -> ports On 07/16/2011 09:02 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: Unless say, you're doing package installation outside of a chroot/jail, to populate something inside a chroot/jail before you start said chroot/jail. I can see "-P" and "-p" working for those many ports which just put programs in p

comms/umcs7840 doesn't compile under FreeBSD 8.2-stable

2011-07-17 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hello, I just upgraded my machine to FreeBSD 8.2-stable (it was running 8.1-stable before): tingo@kg-v2$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Sat Jul 16 02:07:14 CEST 2011 r...@kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and now umcs7840-kmod doesn't compile: roo

Re: FreeBSD Port: spamcup-1.09_2

2011-07-17 Thread Ryan Steinmetz
Doug, Good catch, I'll take care of this shortly. -r On (07/17/11 01:11), Douglas Thrift wrote: > Hello, > > It looks like spamcup is missing a dependency on www/p5-HTML-Form. > Perhaps it was previously a dependency of p5-libwww and the recent > changes made it no longer a dependency. > > Tha

mail/py-spambayes - a patch to make it work with Python 2.7

2011-07-17 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hi, Time flies fast. WE now have Python 2.7 and 3.2 in our system, not Python 2.6. The following patch makes mail/py-spambayes use Python 2.7. root@kg-v2# diff -u Makefile.org Makefile --- Makefile.org2009-08-22 02:27:53.0 +0200 +++ Makefile2011-07-17 14:22:51.0 +0200 @

Re: ports/158179: some packages do not fully honor -P dir option in pkg_add(1)

2011-07-17 Thread Marco Bröder
On Sat July 16 2011 18:21:12 Chris Rees wrote: > Bear in mind they should work fine if the port doesn't hardcode absolute > paths. Yes, they actually do! Please do not remove them, because they are not as buggy as it is claimed here. I often use the -p option for testing of my tinderbox -exp pac

Re: RFC: change to bsd.perl.mk

2011-07-17 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/17/2011 03:07, Chris Rees wrote: > On 17 July 2011 01:47, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 07/16/2011 17:35, Mark Linimon wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: If it's unconditionally included, how does that exempt it from exp-runs? Surely it's equally

Re: RFC: change to bsd.perl.mk

2011-07-17 Thread Chris Rees
On 17 July 2011 01:47, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/16/2011 17:35, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: >>> If it's unconditionally included, how does that exempt it from exp-runs? >>> >>> Surely it's equally risky to commit to it as bsd.port.mk, or have

FreeBSD Port: spamcup-1.09_2

2011-07-17 Thread Douglas Thrift
Hello, It looks like spamcup is missing a dependency on www/p5-HTML-Form. Perhaps it was previously a dependency of p5-libwww and the recent changes made it no longer a dependency. Thanks! -- Douglas William Thrift ___ free