Mark Linimon wrote on 27.07.2011 06:44:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:46:17PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Add Mk/bsd.python.mk to description field
a good idea, but ...
so it will be assigned to portmgr@.
portmgr@ doesn't own all the bsd.*.mk files; bsd.python.mk is owned by
python@. W
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:46:17PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Add Mk/bsd.python.mk to description field
a good idea, but ...
> so it will be assigned to portmgr@.
portmgr@ doesn't own all the bsd.*.mk files; bsd.python.mk is owned by
python@. We're happy to put an -exp run in the queue
Hi,
I'm working on it.
Zhihao Yuan wrote:
It's updating to 3.1.1
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158798
I guess this will be committed soon. Or you can just patch and try
it earlier.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2011 20:47, "Bob Eager" wrote:
> >
> > Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to
> > change a distfile location.
> >
> > It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to
> > ch
On 7/26/2011 3:28 PM, RW wrote:
> It seems more reasonable than the idea that most people using FreeBSD
> are doing so despite being "very unhappy with FreeBSD ports". If that's
> really true then we should give Beastie nipple-clamps and a ball-gag to
> better appeal to our key demographic.
> _
Fixed -- attached msp430mcu to build.
Chris
On 26 July 2011 20:24, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> INDEX build failed with errors:
> Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
> make_index: msp430-libc-gcc4-1.0.20110612: no entry for
> /usr/ports/devel/msp430mcu
> make_index: msp430-libc-gcc4-1.0.20110612
On 26 Jul 2011 20:47, "Bob Eager" wrote:
>
> Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to
> change a distfile location.
>
> It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to
> change (if any).
>
No default package change, no portrevision bump. Leave i
On Jul 26, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Bob Eager wrote:
> Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to
> change a distfile location.
>
> It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to
> change (if any).
Probably nothing-- if someone already has a copy of th
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:13:20 -0700
Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Torfinn Ingolfsen on Tuesday, 26 July 2011:
>
> > > From what i hear, people are happy with the
> > > management of ports in OpenBSD, while most of people i hear are
> > > very unhappy with FreeBSD ports.
> >
> > I would say that "mos
Following a recent post to this list, I need to update a port, just to
change a distfile location.
It seems excessive to bump PORTREVISION, so what is the best thing to
change (if any).
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 26.07.2011 21:07:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:22:31PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 20.07.2011 17:44:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:55:59PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
As far i understand PYTHON_VERSION hold value like 'python2.7'
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
make_index: msp430-libc-gcc4-1.0.20110612: no entry for
/usr/ports/devel/msp430mcu
make_index: msp430-libc-gcc4-1.0.20110612: no entry for
/usr/ports/devel/msp430mcu
Committers on the hook:
lev
Most recent CVS update was:
Op 26-07-2011 20:09, Anton Shterenlikht schreef:
> I maintain these 2 ports:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/distilator/me...@bristol.ac.uk-bad.html
>
> Do I have to do something about it?
>
The 500s should be transient errors, if they persist you might try to
contact the server admins. T
I maintain these 2 ports:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/distilator/me...@bristol.ac.uk-bad.html
Do I have to do something about it?
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:22:31PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Anton Shterenlikht wrote on 20.07.2011 17:44:
> >On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:55:59PM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>
> >>As far i understand PYTHON_VERSION hold value like 'python2.7', so you
> >>should correct this in your
Quoth Torfinn Ingolfsen on Tuesday, 26 July 2011:
> > From what i hear, people are happy with the
> > management of ports in OpenBSD, while most of people i hear are very
> > unhappy with FreeBSD ports.
>
> I would say that "most people your hear" isn't a representative subset
> of all the people
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:56:14 +0200
Torfinn Ingolfsen articulated:
> I would say that "most people your hear" isn't a representative subset
> of all the people who use ports.
> In my experience anyway.
And that would be based on what, people you interact with which may or
may not be a fully repres
Am 25.07.2011 17:59, schrieb Roman Divacky:
> Hi!
>
>
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
> can be
> seen here:
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>
>
> Since the last run we've managed to fix
Am 26.07.2011 13:17, schrieb Alex Goncharov:
> ,--- You/Michel (Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:56 +0200) *
> | while most of people i hear are very unhappy with FreeBSD ports.
>
> Nuts.
People who are unhappy with FreeBSD ports can either help improve, or
use pkgsrc, or use Debian/kFreeBSD, or they c
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Michel Talon wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
>
>> While we are on the subject of port management tools, I still use
>> "portmanager" when a version bump on a port requires that a massive
>> number of dependencies be rebuild. I have had all too many instances
>> when bo
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:24:35PM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
> Le mardi 26 juillet 2011 12:38:35, vous avez ??crit :
>
>
> > Sure, why not kill one of the biggest strengths FreeBSD is known for
> > while we're at it...
>
> Or most obvious weakness ... The biggest strength was a good kernel, bet
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Marco Alberoni
> wrote:
> > Hello everybody, I usually use the applications Sylpheed, Gnash and
> > Seamonkey, and for all of them there the FreeBSD port is not
> > "synchronized" with the latest available version: are there
,--- You/Michel (Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:27:56 +0200) *
| while most of people i hear are very unhappy with FreeBSD ports.
Nuts.
-- Alex -- alex-goncha...@comcast.net --
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
Hi,
I was unhappy that the HandBrake port was outdated and didn't work on
amd64, so I updated it to the best of my ability. Hopefully it's
acceptable, or will at least give someone a head start.
http://desync.com/~bw/handbrake.tar.gz
Only tested on -CURRENT amd64 and RELENG_8 i386.
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/11 08:25, Tilman Keskinöz wrote:
>
> I shortly went through the list.
>
> There are currently 22 PRs filed against portupgrade
>
> Of these:
>
> 4 are general problems of the ports collection/pkg_tools.
> (architecture-specific INDEX,
Le mardi 26 juillet 2011 12:38:35, vous avez écrit :
> Sure, why not kill one of the biggest strengths FreeBSD is known for
> while we're at it...
Or most obvious weakness ... The biggest strength was a good kernel, better
than Linux, but this was years ago.
>
> Two questions:
>
> Who will p
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:27 +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
[ Stuff about how we should move to binary packages because Debian. ]
Sure, why not kill one of the biggest strengths FreeBSD is known for
while we're at it...
Two questions:
Who will provide the infrastructure to build me all of my package
Jerry wrote:
> While we are on the subject of port management tools, I still use
> "portmanager" when a version bump on a port requires that a massive
> number of dependencies be rebuild. I have had all too many instances
> when both "portupgrade" and "portmaster" simply bombed out and left me
> w
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:06 PM, George Liaskos wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I added some jquery for sorting / searching at the latest clang exp run.
> http://cybertron.gr/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/index.html
>
> I hope you 'll find it useful.
The table should be sortable already, j
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:00:33 +0200
Olivier Duchateau wrote:
Hello,
> In tarball, you can find also x11-fm/thunar-devel (v1.3.0 instead of
> v1.2.x), and patches for audio/thunar-media-tags-plugin [2].
Is there any solution on the horizon in regard to Thunar & auto-mounting?
I tried KDE 2 days
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on it.
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mai
32 matches
Mail list logo
